Safety Analysis of Buried Corrosion-Defect Gas Pipeline in Ceramic Soil Layer Under Blasting Action
Source abstract
Abstract
Based on a comprehensive research method combining a field test and numerical simulation, the dynamic response characteristics of a buried corroded gas pipeline under blasting are deeply explored, the numerical model parameters are verified, and the stress distribution of the pipeline is analyzed. It was found that the stress change of the pipeline is significantly affected by the elastic modulus, thickness, and defect length under the same blasting parameters. Increased elastic modulus and thickness can decrease stress, while increasing defect length can increase stress. Therefore, it is suggested that high-elastic-modulus materials should be given priority in pipeline design and material selection, pipeline thickness should be strictly controlled, and regular inspection and maintenance should be carried out. Especially for pipe sections with long defect length, monitoring and maintenance should be strengthened, and safety assessment and protection measures should be formulated before blasting operation to ensure the safe operation of the corrosive gas pipeline under the action of blasting vibration.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Fujian University of Technology, Fuzhou 350000, China
College of Art, Kongju National University, Gongju 32588, Chungcheongnam-do, Republic of Korea
College of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. (2005). ABS Guide for Building and Classing Subsea Pipeline System, American Bureau of Shipping.
2. Analytical solution of the dynamic response of buried pipelines underblast wave10.1016/j.ijrmms.2016.07.014 ↗
3. Comparison of experimental and finite element analytical results for the strength and the deformation of pipes with local wall thinning subjected to bending moment10.1016/j.nucengdes.2005.07.010 ↗
4. Factors influencing the behavior of buried pipelines subjected to earthquakefaulting10.1016/j.soildyn.2008.04.006 ↗
5. Response of single piles and pipelines in liquefaction-induced lateral spreads using controlled blasting10.1007/s11803-002-0064-3 ↗
6. Large diameter pipe under combined loading10.1061/TPEJAN.0000346 ↗
7. Chen, M. (2013). MATLAB Neural Network Principle and Case Solution. [Ph.D. Thesis, Tsinghua University Press].
8. Blasting and construction vibrations near existing pipelines: What are the appropriate levels?
9. Response of pipelines to blast loading10.1080/13287982.2007.11464976 ↗
10. Blast response of composite pipeline structure using finite element techniques10.1177/0021998315618768 ↗
11. Centrifuge modeling of earthquake effects on buried high-density polyethylene (HDPE) pipelines crossing fault zones10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:10(1501) ↗
12. Bending moment capacity of pipes10.1115/1.1314866 ↗
13. Hauch, S., and Bai, Y. (June, January 27). Bending moment capacity of groovecorroded pipes. Proceeding of the Tenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Seattle, WA, USA.
14. Investigation of influence the pressure and stress on the water in buried concrete pipes in the different soil under blast loading10.21859/jces-01015 ↗
15. Huisman, O., Almandoz, R., Schuster, T., Caballero, A.A., and Forero, L.M. (October, January 29). Leveraging HCA results in an advanced pipeline risk assessment model. Proceedings of the Biennial International Pipeline Conference, IPC, Calgary, AB, Canada.
16. Developing a new inference system for pipeline risk assessment10.1016/j.jlp.2012.10.010 ↗
17. Effect of excavation blasting vibration on adjacent buried gas pipeline in a metro tunnel10.1016/j.tust.2018.08.022 ↗
18. Effect of length of thinning area on the failure behavior of carbon steel pipe containing a defect of wall thinning10.1016/S0029-5493(02)00386-2 ↗
19. Net-section limit load approach for failure strength estimates ofpipes with local wall thinning10.1016/j.ijpvp.2006.03.001 ↗
20. Analytical calculation of blast-induced strains to buried pipelines10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.08.008 ↗
21. Mechanical response of buried polyethylene pipelines under excavation load during pavement construction10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.03.027 ↗
22. Fracture behavior of carbon steel pipe with local wall thinning subjected to bending load10.1016/S0029-5493(99)00141-7 ↗
23. Reliability of pipelines with corrosion defects10.1016/j.ijpvp.2007.09.002 ↗
24. (2015). Code for Design of Gas Pipeline Engineering (Standard No. GB50251-2015).
25. (2008). Code on Ductile Iron Pipes, Fittings and Accessories for Water and Gas Pipelines (Standard No. GB-T 13295-2008).