journal article·2025-03-13Open access

Modeling and Simulation of Standing Wave Configurations for Outflow Improvement and Minimizing Undesired Recirculation

Julien Schwalbe, Bogac Tur, Stefan Kniesburges, Nicolas Neuss, Michael Stingl, Thorsten Keck, Joachim Buff, Michael Döllinger

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 6

Abstract

River surfing has evolved from natural rivers to artificial standing waves, like the Fuchslochwelle in Nuremberg, where optimizing wave quality and safety remains a challenge. Key issues include recirculation zones that pose risks, particularly at higher inflows. This study addresses safety and performance improvements by introducing geometric modifications to reduce recirculation zones. Using STAR-CCM+ simulations, 16 configurations of baffles and inlays were analyzed. A 3D-CAD model of the Fuchslochwelle was developed to test symmetrical and asymmetrical configurations, focusing on reducing vorticity. Results showed that baffles placed 2 m from the inlay reduced recirculation zones by over 50%. Asymmetrical setups, combining wall and inlay baffles, also proved effective. Following simulations, a baffle was installed at 3 m, enhancing safety and quality. Previously, inflows above 7.5 m3/s caused dangerous backflow, requiring surfers to swim or dive to escape turbulence. With the baffle, safe operation increased to 9 m3/s, a 20% improvement, making the system suitable for surfers of all skill levels. These finding provide a novel approach to enhancing flow dynamics, applicable to a wide range of artificial standing waves. The valuable insights gained enable operators to optimize the dynamics and accessibility through geometric modifications while ensuring safety for users.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Coastal and Marine Dynamics · Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions · Hydraulic flow and structures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Aerodynamics and Flow Technology, German Aerospace Center, Bunsenstr. 10, 37073 Göttingen, Germany

Divison of Phoniatrics and Pediatric Audiology, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Medical School, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Waldstrasse 1, 91054 Erlangen, Germany

Chair of Applied Mathematics (Scientific Computing), Department of Mathematics, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Cauerstrasse 11, 91058 Erlangen, Germany

Chair of Applied Mathematics (Continuous Optimization), Department of Mathematics, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Cauerstrasse 11, 91058 Erlangen, Germany

Nürnberger Dauerwelle e.V., Heimerichstrasse 46, 90419 Nürnberg, Germany

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Leinewelle, e.V. (2025, February 12). Surfen mitten in Hannover. Available online: https://www.enercity-leinewelle.de/.
2. Nürnberger Dauerwelle e.V. (2025, February 12). Die FuchslochWelle-SURFEN IN DER STADT. Available online: https://www.nuernberger-dauerwelle.de/fuchslochwelle/.
3. Fuchs, H. (2017, January 13–18). Effect of adjustable flaps on river surf waves at abrupt drops. Proceedings of the 37th IAHR World Congress: Learning from the Past for the Future, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
4. A stationary oblique breaking wave for laboratory testing of surfboards10.1017/S0022112076002553 ↗
5. D’Ambrosio, D. (2020, January 22–25). Hydrodynamic Characterization of Planing Surfboards Using CFD. Proceedings of the 13th Conference of the International Sports Engineering Association, Tokyo, Japan.10.3390/proceedings2020049068 ↗
6. Oggiano, L. (2017, January 30–31). Numerical Comparison between a Modern Surfboard and an Alaia Board using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). Proceedings of the 5th International Congress on Sport Sciences Research and Technology Support, Funchal, Portugal.10.5220/0006488400750082 ↗
7. Oggiano, L., and Pierella, F. (2018, January 26–29). CFD for Surfboards: Comparison between Three Different Designs in Static and Maneuvering Conditions. Proceedings of the the 12th Conference of the International Sports Engineering Association, Brisbane, Australia.10.3390/proceedings2060309 ↗
8. Forsyth, J.R., Barnsley, G., Amirghasemi, M., Barthelemy, J., Elshahomi, A., Kosasih, B., Perez, P., Beirne, S., Steele, J.R., and In Het Panhuis, M. (2024). Understanding the relationship between surfing performance and fin design. Sci. Rep., 14.10.1038/s41598-024-58387-y ↗
9. Computational hydrodynamics of a typical 3-fin surfboard setup10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2019.07.006 ↗
10. Falk, S., Kniesburges, S., Janka, R., O’Keefe, T., Grosso, R., and Döllinger, M. (2020). Numerical Investigation of the Hydrodynamics of Changing Fin Positions within a 4-Fin Surfboard Configuration. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10030816 ↗
11. Scarfe, B.E., Elwany, M.H.S., Mead, S.T., and Black, K.P. (2003). The Science of Surfing Waves and Surfing Breaks—A Review, UC San Diego, Scripps Institution of Oceanography.
12. Designing a multifunctional artificial reef: Studies on the influence of parameters with most influence in the vertical plane10.1007/s11852-010-0124-1 ↗
13. Design of Surfing Reefs
14. Wave and Flow Response to an Artificial Surf Reef: Laboratory Measurements10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000177 ↗
15. Designing a Preliminary Multifunctional Artificial Reef to Protect the Portuguese Coast10.2112/07-0827.1 ↗
16. Hydraulic jumps at positive and negative steps10.1080/00221688609499303 ↗
17. Wave type flow at abrupt drops: I. Flow geometry10.1080/00221689009499088 ↗
18. Hydraulic Jump at An Abrupt Drop10.1061/TACEAT.0007723 ↗
19. Tailwater level effects on flow conditions at an abrupt drop10.1080/00221680309499927 ↗
20. Transition from supercritical to subcritical flow at an abrupt drop10.1080/00221689109498436 ↗
21. Hydraulic Jumps and Waves at Abrupt Drops10.1061/JYCEAJ.0004732 ↗
22. Artificial stationary breaking surf waves in a physical and numerical model10.1080/00221686.2012.672831 ↗
23. Borman, D.J., Sleigh, P.A., Coughtrie, A., and Horton, L. (2014, January 14–16). Hydraulic Free-Surface Modelling with a Novel Validation Approach. Proceedings of the 9th South African Conference on Computational and Applied Mechanics, Somerset West, South Africa.
24. Asiaban, P., Rennie, C.D., and Egsgard, N. (2021). Sensitivity Analysis of Adjustable River Surf Waves in the Absence of Channel Drop. Water, 13.10.3390/w13091287 ↗
25. Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5 ↗
26. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications10.2514/3.12149 ↗
27. Reassessment of the scale-determining equation for advanced turbulence models10.2514/3.10041 ↗