The TEDDY Framework: An Efficient Framework for Target Tracking Using Edge-Based Distributed Smart Cameras with Dynamic Camera Selection
Source abstract
Abstract
Multi-camera target tracking is a critical technology for continuous monitoring in large-scale environments, with applications in smart cities, security surveillance, and emergency response. However, existing tracking systems often suffer from high computational costs and energy inefficiencies, particularly in resource-constrained edge computing environments. Traditional methods typically rely on static or heuristic-based camera selection, leading to redundant computations and suboptimal resource allocation. This paper introduces a novel framework for efficient single-target tracking using edge-based distributed smart cameras with dynamic camera selection. The proposed framework employs context-aware dynamic camera selection, activating only the cameras most likely to detect the target based on its predicted trajectory. This approach is designed for resource-constrained environments and significantly reduces computational load and energy consumption while maintaining high tracking accuracy. The framework was evaluated through two experiments. In the first, single-person tracking was conducted across multiple routes with various target behaviors, demonstrating the framework’s effectiveness in optimizing resource utilization. In the second, the framework was applied to a simulated urban traffic light adjustment system for emergency vehicles, achieving significant reductions in computational load while maintaining equivalent tracking accuracy compared to an always-on camera system. These findings highlight the robustness, scalability, and energy efficiency of the framework in edge-based camera networks. Furthermore, the framework enables future advancements in dynamic resource management and scalable tracking technologies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods · Infrared Target Detection Methodologies · Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Robotics, Kwangwoon University, Seoul 01897, Republic of Korea
Funding
Research Grant of Kwangwoon University
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Reinforcement Learning Based Querying in Camera Networks for Efficient Target Tracking
2. Intelligent querying for target tracking in camera networks using deep Q-learning with n-step bootstrapping10.1016/j.imavis.2020.104022 ↗
3. Bewley, A., Ge, Z., Ott, L., Ramos, F., and Upcroft, B. (2016, January 25–28). Simple online and realtime tracking. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Phoenix, AZ, USA.10.1109/ICIP.2016.7533003 ↗
4. A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems10.1115/1.3662552 ↗
5. Wojke, N., Bewley, A., and Paulus, D. (2017). Simple Online and Realtime Tracking with a Deep Association Metric. arXiv.10.1109/ICIP.2017.8296962 ↗
6. Wang, Z., Zheng, L., Liu, Y., Li, Y., and Wang, S. (2020). Towards Real-Time Multi-Object Tracking. arXiv.10.1007/978-3-030-58621-8_7 ↗
7. FairMOT: On the Fairness of Detection and Re-identification in Multiple Object Tracking10.1007/s11263-021-01513-4 ↗
8. Yan, B., Jiang, Y., Sun, P., Wang, D., Yuan, Z., Luo, P., and Lu, H. (2022). Towards Grand Unification of Object Tracking. arXiv.10.1007/978-3-031-19803-8_43 ↗
9. Braso, G., and Leal-Taixe, L. (2020, January 13–19). Learning a Neural Solver for Multiple Object Tracking. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00628 ↗
10. He, J., Huang, Z., Wang, N., and Zhang, Z. (2021). Learnable Graph Matching: Incorporating Graph Partitioning with Deep Feature Learning for Multiple Object Tracking. arXiv.10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.00526 ↗
11. Kim, C., Li, F., Ciptadi, A., and Rehg, J.M. (2015, January 7–13). Multiple Hypothesis Tracking Revisited. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Santiago, Chile.10.1109/ICCV.2015.533 ↗
12. Multi-camera multi-object tracking: A review of current trends and future advances10.1016/j.neucom.2023.126558 ↗
13. Makris, D., Ellis, T., and Black, J. Bridging the gaps between cameras. Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Washington, DC, USA, 27 June–2 July 2004.10.1109/CVPR.2004.1315165 ↗
14. Cai, Y., and Medioni, G. (2014, January 24–26). Exploring context information for inter-camera multiple target tracking. Proceedings of the IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, Steamboat Springs, CO, USA.10.1109/WACV.2014.6836026 ↗
15. Styles, O., Guha, T., Sanchez, V., and Kot, A. (2020, January 14–19). Multi-Camera Trajectory Forecasting: Pedestrian Trajectory Prediction in a Network of Cameras. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/CVPRW50498.2020.00516 ↗
16. Sharma, A., and Buduru, A.B. (2018, January 10–15). Foresee: Attentive Future Projections of Chaotic Road Environments. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, AAMAS ’18, Stockholm, Sweden.
17. Deep Learning for Person Re-Identification: A Survey and Outlook10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3054775 ↗
18. Ristani, E., and Tomasi, C. (2018). Features for Multi-Target Multi-Camera Tracking and Re-Identification. arXiv.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00632 ↗
19. Jiang, N., Bai, S., Xu, Y., Xing, C., Zhou, Z., and Wu, W. (2018, January 22–26). Online Inter-Camera Trajectory Association Exploiting Person Re-Identification and Camera Topology. Proceedings of the 26th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, MM ’18, New York, NY, USA.10.1145/3240508.3240663 ↗
20. Zhang, S., Staudt, E., Faltemier, T.C., and Roy-Chowdhury, A.K. (2015, January 5–9). A Camera Network Tracking (CamNeT) Dataset and Performance Baseline. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, Waikoloa, HI, USA.10.1109/WACV.2015.55 ↗
21. Chen, W., Cao, L., Chen, X., and Huang, K. (2016). An equalised global graphical model-based approach for multi-camera object tracking. arXiv.
22. Adaptive Learning for Target Tracking and True Linking Discovering Across Multiple Non-Overlapping Cameras10.1109/TMM.2011.2131639 ↗
23. Multicamera People Tracking with a Probabilistic Occupancy Map10.1109/TPAMI.2007.1174 ↗
24. Tang, S., Andriluka, M., Andres, B., and Schiele, B. (2017, January 21–26). Multiple People Tracking by Lifted Multicut and Person Re-Identification. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2017.394 ↗
25. Wan, J., and Li, L. (November, January 29). Distributed optimization for global data association in non-overlapping camera networks. Proceedings of the 2013 Seventh International Conference on Distributed Smart Cameras (ICDSC), Palm Springs, CA, USA.10.1109/ICDSC.2013.6778229 ↗
26. Ristani, E., Solera, F., Zou, R.S., Cucchiara, R., and Tomasi, C. (2016). Performance Measures and a Data Set for Multi-Target, Multi-Camera Tracking. arXiv.10.1007/978-3-319-48881-3_2 ↗
27. Cremers, D., Reid, I., Saito, H., and Yang, M.H. (2014, January 1–5). Tracking Multiple People Online and in Real Time. Proceedings of the Computer Vision—ACCV 2014, Singapore.10.1007/978-3-319-16814-2 ↗
28. Sharma, A., Anand, S., and Kaul, S.K. (2022, January 3–8). Intelligent Camera Selection Decisions for Target Tracking in a Camera Network. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), Waikoloa, HI, USA.10.1109/WACV51458.2022.00314 ↗
29. Ganesh, S.V., Wu, Y., Liu, G., Kompella, R., and Liu, L. (2023, January 1–3). Amplifying Object Tracking Performance on Edge Devices. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 5th International Conference on Cognitive Machine Intelligence (CogMI), Atlanta, GA, USA.10.1109/CogMI58952.2023.00021 ↗
30. Oh, C., Lee, M., and Lim, C. (2023). Towards Real-Time On-Drone Pedestrian Tracking in 4K Inputs. Drones, 7.10.3390/drones7100623 ↗
31. Jocher, G., Chaurasia, A., and Qiu, J. (2025, January 26). Ultralytics YOLOv8. Available online: https://docs.ultralytics.com/.
32. Zhou, K., and Xiang, T. (2019). Torchreid: A Library for Deep Learning Person Re-Identification in Pytorch. arXiv.
33. Zhou, K., Yang, Y., Cavallaro, A., and Xiang, T. (November, January 27). Omni-Scale Feature Learning for Person Re-Identification. Proceedings of the ICCV, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
34. Learning Generalisable Omni-Scale Representations for Person Re-Identification
35. Dosovitskiy, A., Ros, G., Codevilla, F., Lopez, A., and Koltun, V. (2017, January 13–15). CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulator. Proceedings of the 1st Annual Conference on Robot Learning, Mountain View, CA, USA.