Evaluation of the Performance of Soil-Nailed Walls in Weathered Sandstones Utilizing Instrumental Data
Source abstract
Abstract
Used for soil and weathered rocks, soil nails are rigid reinforcements positioned at certain angles on the ground to provide slope stability. A rigid reinforcement element placed in a well filled with cement grout mix after completing drilling will generate adherence stress between the grout-mixed nail bar and soil. Due to this stress, load is transferred to the soil along the soil–grout interaction surface. In the case discussed herein, the slope at the parcel border needed to be made steeper in order to accommodate the construction of a facility in the Taşkısığı region of Sakarya province. Soil-nailed walls, which are inexpensive and suitable for weathered rocks, were needed as a support system because the slope was too steep to support itself. Support system performance was measured using two inclinometers and two soil nail pull-out tests conducted on different sections observed during and after construction. Contrary to the design-phase prediction, it was determined that the stresses started to dampen in the region closer to the slope-facing zone. Field measurement data and numerical analysis revealed that higher parameters than necessary were selected. In this context, sensitivity and parameter analyses were carried out using the Hoek–Brown constitutive model. The GSI value was re-evaluated and found to be compatible with the observation results obtained from the field performance. Since the retaining wall performance observed was higher than expected, geometric parametric analysis of the structural elements was performed; high safety coefficients were found across variations. The effects of the inclination of the slope, nail length, nail spacing, and nail slope design parameters on the safety coefficient and horizontal displacement were examined. The optimal design suggested nail lengths of 4.00 m, a spacing of 1.60 m, and slopes of 20°. It was discovered that the effect of the inclination degree of the slope on the safety coefficient was lower than expected. The results revealed that a more economical design with a similar safety factor can be obtained by shortening the lengths of the nails.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, Davutpasa Campus, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul 34230, Türkiye
Mining Faculty, Geological Engineering Department, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul 34469, Türkiye
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Nailed-soil retaining structures: Design and practice
2. Durgunoğlu, H.T. (2008, January 12–16). Performance of deep soil nailed walls. Proceedings of the International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering, Arlington, VA, USA.
3. Lazarte, C.A., Robinson, H., Gómez, J.E., Baxter, A., Cadden, A., and Berg, R. (2015). Soil Nail Walls Reference Manual, No. FHWA-NHI-14-007.
4. Schloser, F. (December, January 29). Behaviour and design of soil nailing. Proceedings of the International Symposium Held at Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok, Thailand.
5. Mohamed, M.H., Ahmed, M., and Mallick, J. (2021). Pullout Behavior of Nail Reinforcement in Nailed Soil Slope. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11146419 ↗
6. The pull-out resistance of model soil nails10.3208/sandf.38.2_179 ↗
7. Franzén, G. (1998). Soil Nailing—A Laboratory and Field Study of Pullout Capacity. [Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology].
8. Ruggeri, P., Fruzzetti, V.M.E., and Scarpelli, G. (2020). The Behavior of a Thread-Bar Grouted Anchor in Soils from Local Strain Monitoring. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10207194 ↗
9. Comparison of Interface Shear Strength of Soil Nails Measured by Both Direct Shear Box Tests and Pullout Tests10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:9(1097) ↗
10. Soil nails field pullout testing: Evaluation and applications10.3328/IJGE.2010.04.01.13-21 ↗
11. Field pullout testing and performance evaluation of GFRP soil nails10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000457 ↗
12. Laboratory and field evaluation of several types of soil nails for different geological conditions10.1139/cgj-2015-0267 ↗
13. Evaluation of interface shear behavior of GFRP soil nails with a strain-transfer model and distributed fiber-optic sensors10.1016/j.compgeo.2017.10.005 ↗
14. Liao, Y., Li, H., Gao, K., Ni, S., Li, Y., Chen, G., and Kong, Z. (2024). Study on Soil Stabilization and Slope Protection Effects of Different Plants on Fully Weathered Granite Backfill Slopes. Water, 16.10.3390/w16172548 ↗
15. Tian, H.J., and Kong, Z.G. (2023). Influence of Rainfall Intensity and Slope on the Slope Erosion of Longling Completely Weathered Granite. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13095295 ↗
16. He, B., Lin, M., Yu, X., Peng, G., Huang, G., and Dai, S. (2024). Bearing Behavior of Large-Diameter Monopile Foundations of Offshore Wind Turbines in Weathered Residual Soil Seabeds. J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 12.10.3390/jmse12101785 ↗
17. Wang, H., Cheng, J., Li, H., Dun, Z., and Cheng, B. (2021). Full-scale field test on construction mechanical behaviors of retaining structure enhanced with soil nails and prestressed anchors. Appl. Sci., 11.10.21203/rs.3.rs-322999/v1 ↗
18. Kim, H., Rehman, H., Ali, W., Naji, A.M., Kim, J.J., Kim, J., and Yoo, H. (2019). Classification of factors affecting the performance of fully grouted rock bolts with empirical classification systems. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9224781 ↗
19. Deformation behaviour, crack initiation and crack damage of weathered composite sandstone-shale by using the ultrasonic wave and the acoustic emission under uniaxial compressive stress10.1016/j.ijrmms.2023.105497 ↗
20. Hydro-mechanical coupling effect on water permeability of intensely weathered sandstone10.1139/cgj-2022-0113 ↗
21. ISRM (1981). Suggested Methods for the Rock Characterization, Testing and Monitoring, Pergamon Press.
22. Ulusay, R., and Hudson, J.A. (2007). The complete ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring: 1974–2006. Suggested Methods Prepared by the Commission on Testing Methods, Kozan Ofset. ISRM, Compilation Arranged by the ISRM Turkish National Group.
23. (2021). Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Determination of Density and Unit Weight of Soil Specimens (Standard No. ASTM D7263-21).
24. Bolton, M.D. (1990, January 10–12). Reinforced Soil Laboratory Testing and Modelling. Performance of Reinforced Soil Structures. Proceedings of the International Reinforced Soil Conference, Glasgow, UK.
25. Yin, J.H., Jin, W., Yeung, A.T., and Mak, L.M. (2007). Performance evaluation of electrical strain gauges and optical fiber sensors in field soil nail pullout tests. Proceedings of the HKIE Geotechnical Division Annual Seminar, Hong Kong Institution of Engineers.
26. Choi, H., Choi, S., and Cha, H. (2008, January 17–19). Structural health monitoring system based on strain gauge enabled wireless sensor nodes. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Networked Sensing Systems, Kanazawa, Japan.
27. Zhu, H.H., Yin, J.H., Jin, W., and Zhou, W.H. (2007, January 21–24). Soil nail monitoring using Fiber Bragg Grating sensors during pullout tests. Proceedings of the Joint 60th Canadian Geotechnical and 8th IAH-CNC Conferences, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
28. The Hoek–Brown failure criterion and GSI—2018 edition10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.08.001 ↗
29. Yamamuro, J.A., and Kaliakin, V.N. (2005). Selection of soil models and parameters for geotechnical engineering application. Soil Constitutive Models: Evaluation, Selection, and Calibration, Proceedings of the Geo-Frontiers Congress, Austin, TX, USA, 24–26 January 2005, American Society of Civil Engineers.
30. Brinkgreve, R.B.J., Kumarswamy, S., and Swolfs, W.M. (2017). Plaxis, Reference Manual, PLAXIS BV.
31. Saeidi, A., Cloutier, C., Kamalibandpey, A., and Shahbazi, A. (2022). Evaluation of the Effect of Geomechanical Parameters and In Situ Stress on Tunnel Response Using Equivalent Mohr-Coulomb and Generalized Hoek-Brown Criteria. Geosciences, 12.10.3390/geosciences12070262 ↗
32. Dunnicliff, J. (1993). Geotechnical Instrumentation for Monitoring Field Performance, John Wiley & Sons. [1st ed.].
33. FHWA (2015). Soil Nail Walls Reference Manual Developed Following: In AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications.
34. GeoSense (2022). VW Strain Gauge Manual: V. 1.8, GeoSense.
35. Byrne, R.J., Cotton, D., Porterfield, J., Wolschlag, C., and Ueblacker, G. (1998). Manual for Design and Construction Monitoring of Soil Nail Walls, Revised Edition; Report No. FHWA-SA-96R.
36. Gui, M.-W., and Rajak, R.P. (2023). Responses of Structural Components of a Full-Scale Nailed Retaining Structure under the Influence of Surcharge Loading and Nail Head Configuration: A Numerical Study. Buildings, 13.10.3390/buildings13020561 ↗
37. Li, C., Zhao, X., Xu, X., and Qu, X. (2024). Study on the differences between Hoek–Brown parameters and equivalent Mohr–Coulomb parameters in the calculation slope critical acceleration and permanent displacement. Sci. Rep., 14.10.1038/s41598-024-65494-3 ↗
38. Effect of nail spacing on the global stability of soil nailed walls using limit equilibrium and finite element methods10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100454 ↗
39. Sert, S., and Önalp, A. (2011, January 5–7). Derin Kazılarda Hassaslık ve Parametre Değişimi Analizi. Proceedings of the Geoteknik Sempozyumu, Çukurova Üniversitesi, Adana, Turkey.
40. Brinkgreve, R., Laera, A., and Burg, M. (2017, January 27–28). New Developments in PLAXIS: Material Point Method and Reliability Analysis. Proceedings of the Workshop on Numerical Methods in Geotechnics, Hamburg, Germany.
41. Narimani, S., Davarpanah, S.M., Bar, N., Török, Á., and Vásárhelyi, B. (2023). Geological Strength Index Relationships with the Q-System and Q-Slope. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su151411233 ↗
42. Bienawski, Z.T. (1989). Engineering Rock Mass Classifications, Wiley.
43. Study on the effect of some parameters of soil nails on the stability of vertical slopes
44. Three Dimensional Finite Difference Analysis of Key Parameters Affecting the Stability and the Performance of Nailed Walls10.1016/j.kscej.2024.100027 ↗
45. Mohamed, M.H., Ahmed, M., Mallick, J., and AlQadhi, S. (2023). Finite Element Modeling of the Soil-Nailing Process in Nailed-Soil Slopes. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13042139 ↗