journal article·2025-03-06Open access

A Data-Driven Method for Determining DRASTIC Weights to Assess Groundwater Vulnerability to Nitrate: Application in the Lake Baiyangdian Watershed, North China Plain

Xianglong Hou, Liqin Peng, Yuan Zhang, Yan Zhang, Yunxia Wang, Wenzhao Feng, Hui Yang

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 5

Abstract

Nitrate pollution due to agricultural activities challenges the management of groundwater resources. The most popular technique used for groundwater vulnerability assessments is the DRASTIC. The subjectivity introduced by the DRASTIC has always been questioned. Therefore, the determination of rating scores and weights of parameters has become the main difficulty in DRASTIC applications. In this paper, a new data-driven weighting method based on Monte Carlo or genetic algorithm was developed. The new method considers both single factors and the relationship among factors, overcomes the subjectivity of weight determination, and is theoretically applicable to various hydrogeological environments and as a general weight determination method. In addition, a new method for the verification of the evaluation results on a temporal scale was established, which is based on changes in the nitrate concentration over the past 20 years. To verify and test these methods, they were used for the evaluation of groundwater vulnerability to nitrate in the plain area of the Baiyangdian watershed in the North China Plain and compared with other commonly used methods. The Pearson correlation coefficient increased by 15%. From a time perspective, the changes in nitrate concentration confirmed that the correctness of the assessment is 88%. In this study, the effect of the revision of the rating ranges on the improvement of the evaluation results is very obvious. Therefore, the focus of future work should be on determining the rating ranges and their rating scores, and whether the corresponding weights based on the data-driven method will yield more reliable results.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Geographical Sciences, Hebei Academy of Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050011, China

Hebei Technology Innovation Center for Geographic Information Application, Shijiazhuang 050011, China

Hebei Province Collaborative Innovation Center for Sustainable Utilization of Water Resources and Optimization of Industrial Structure, Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang 050031, China

Key Laboratory of Agricultural Water Resources, Hebei Key Laboratory of Agricultural Water-Saving, Center for Agricultural Resources Research, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050001, China

Funding

Pilot Project of Basic Research Operating Expenses System of Hebei Academy of Sciences, China

References (60)

Show source-provided references
1. Optimizing the DRASTIC method for nitrate pollution in groundwater vulnerability assessments: A case study in China10.15244/pjoes/75181 ↗
2. Classification of aquifer vulnerability using K-means cluster analysis10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.03.060 ↗
3. Assessing intrinsic and specific vulnerability models ability to indicate groundwater vulnerability to groups of similar pesticides: A comparative study
4. Modification to the DRASTIC framework to assess groundwater contaminant risk in rural mountainous catchments10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.09.013 ↗
5. A high-resolution nitrate vulnerability assessment of sandy aquifers (DRASTIC-N)10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111330 ↗
6. Development and testing of three hybrid methods for the assessment of aquifer vulnerability to nitrates, based on the DRASTIC model, an example from NE Korinthia, Greece10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.08.014 ↗
7. Assessment and validation of groundwater vulnerability to nitrate based on a modified DRASTIC model: A case study in Jilin City of northeast China10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.08.037 ↗
8. Barbulescu, A. (2020). Assessing groundwater vulnerability: DRASTIC and DRASTIC-like methods: A review. Water, 12.10.3390/w12051356 ↗
9. DRASTIC, God, and SI approaches for assessing groundwater vulnerability to pollution: A review10.1186/s12302-022-00646-8 ↗
10. Aller, L., Bennet, T., Leher, J.H., Petty, R.J., and National Water Well Association (1985). DRASTIC: A Standardized System for Evaluating Groundwater Pollution Potential Using Hydrogeologm Settings, United States Environmental Protection Agency. EPA/600/2 85/018_296.
11. Aller, L., Bennet, T., Leher, J.H., and Petty, R.J. (1987). DRASTIC: A Standardized System for Evaluating Ground Water Pollution Potential Using Hydrogeological Settings, US Environmental Protection Agency.10.17491/jgsi/1987/290112 ↗
12. Calibration of the DRASTIC ground water vulnerability mapping method10.1111/j.1745-6584.2001.tb02350.x ↗
13. Groundwater vulnerability assessment and feasibility mapping under reclaimed water irrigation by a modified DRASTIC model10.1007/s11269-014-0536-z ↗
14. An integrated approach for aquifer vulnerability mapping using GIS and rough sets: Study from an alluvial aquifer in north India10.1007/s10040-014-1147-8 ↗
15. Modified DRASTIC model for groundwater vulnerability to nitrate contamination in the Dagujia river basin, China10.2166/ws.2021.018 ↗
16. Evaluation of groundwater vulnerability to pollution using DRASTIC, composite DRASTIC, and nitrate vulnerability models10.34172/EHEM.2021.16 ↗
17. Designing dynamic groundwater management strategies through a composite groundwater vulnerability model: Integrating human-related parameters into the DRASTIC model using Lightgbm regression and SHAP analysis10.1016/j.envres.2023.116871 ↗
18. Assessment of groundwater nitrate vulnerability using DRASTIC and modified DRASTIC in upper catchment of Sabarmati basin10.1007/s12665-023-10880-9 ↗
19. Groundwater vulnerability assessment for nitrate pollution based on modified DRASTIC method: A case study in southwest China10.15666/aeer/2203_23392358 ↗
20. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I ↗
21. AHP-DRASTIC: Software for specific aquifer vulnerability assessment using DRASTIC model and GIS10.1016/S1364-8152(03)00051-3 ↗
22. Optimization of the DRASTIC method for groundwater vulnerability assessment via the use of simple statistical methods and GIS10.1007/s10040-005-0008-x ↗
23. Developing a probability-based model of aquifer vulnerability in an agricultural region10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.02.019 ↗
24. An approach to aquifer vulnerability including uncertainty in a spatial random function framework10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.06.016 ↗
25. Factor weighting in DRASTIC modeling10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.09.092 ↗
26. Optimization of DRASTIC method by supervised committee machine artificial intelligence to assess groundwater vulnerability for Maragheh-Bonab plain aquifer, Iran10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.08.038 ↗
27. Evaluation of an intrinsic and a specific vulnerability assessment method in comparison with groundwater salinisation and nitrate contamination levels in two agricultural regions in the south of Portugal10.1007/s10040-004-0396-3 ↗
28. Screening for long-term trends in groundwater nitrate monitoring data10.1144/1470-9236/07-040 ↗
29. Prediction of the arrival of peak nitrate concentrations at the water table at the regional scale in Great Britain10.1002/hyp.8164 ↗
30. Groundwater vulnerability maps derived from a time-dependent method using satellite scatterometer data10.1007/s10040-015-1236-3 ↗
31. The changing trend in nitrate concentrations in major aquifers due to historical nitrate loading from agricultural land across England and Wales from 1925 to 215010.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.127 ↗
32. A discussion of groundwater vulnerability assessment methods
33. Landform sedimentary contributed to groundwater nitrate vulnerability in multi-alluvial fan aquifer systems in a watershed10.1007/s12665-023-10932-0 ↗
34. Groundwater vulnerability and pollution risk assessment of porous aquifers to nitrate: Modifying the DRASTIC method using quantitative parameters10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.03.035 ↗
35. Use of logistic regression and GIS modeling to predict groundwater vulnerability to pesticides10.2134/jeq1996.00472425002500030007x ↗
36. Predicting the probability of elevated nitrate concentrations in the Puget Sound basin: Implications for aquifer susceptibility and vulnerability10.1111/j.1745-6584.1997.tb00175.x ↗
37. Gentle, J.E. (2003). Random Number Generation and Monte Carlo Methods, Springer.
38. Fishman, G.S. (2013). Monte Carlo: Concepts, Algorithms, and Applications, Springer.
39. John, H. (1992). Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence, The MIT Press.
40. Mitchell, M. (1999). An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms, MIT Press. [5th ed.].
41. A genetic algorithm tutorial10.1007/BF00175354 ↗
42. Eiben, A.E., and Smith, J.E. (2015). Introduction to Evolutionary Computing, Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-44874-8 ↗
43. Predicting groundwater nitrate concentrations in a region of mixed agricultural land use: A comparison of three approaches10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00111-7 ↗
44. Building factorial regression models to explain and predict nitrate concentrations in groundwater under agricultural land10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.05.009 ↗
45. Nitrogen fertilizer use in China—Contributions to food production, impacts on the environment and best management strategies10.1023/A:1021107026067 ↗
46. Resilience analysis for agricultural systems of North China Plain based on a dynamic system model10.1590/S0103-90162011000100002 ↗
47. Field scale interaction and nutrient exchange between surface water and shallow groundwater in the Baiyang lake region, North China Plain10.1016/j.jes.2015.11.021 ↗
48. Prediction of agriculture derived groundwater nitrate distribution in North China Plain with GIS-based BPNN10.1007/s00254-006-0237-x ↗
49. Using major ions and δ15N-NO3− to identify nitrate sources and fate in an alluvial aquifer of the Baiyangdian lake watershed, North China Plain10.1039/c3em00058c ↗
50. Wu, C. (2008). Landform Environment and Its Formation in North China, Science Press. (In Chinese).
51. Empirical Maximum Likelihood Kriging: The General Case10.1007/s11004-005-6665-4 ↗
52. The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission10.1029/2005RG000183 ↗
53. Hirt, C., Filmer, M.S., and Featherstone, W.E. (2009, July 28). Comparison and Validation of the Recent Freely Available ASTER-GDEM ver1, SRTM ver4.1 and GEODATA DEM-9S ver3 Digital Elevation Models over Australia. Available online: https://espace.curtin.edu.au/bitstream/20.500.11937/43846/2/137777_137777.pdf.10.1080/08120091003677553 ↗
54. Comparison of free high resolution digital elevation data sets (ASTER GDEM2, SRTM v2.1/v4.1) and validation against accurate heights from the Australian National Gravity Database
55. Zhang, Z., and Fei, Y. (2009). Atlas of Groundwater Sustainable Utilization in North China Plain, China Cartographic Publishing House.
56. Impacts of thickening unsaturated zone on groundwater recharge in the North China Plain10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.03.049 ↗
57. Using remote sensing to analyze spatiotemporal variations in crop planting in the North China Plain
58. Water movement and solute transport in deep vadose zone under four irrigated agricultural land-use types in the North China Plain10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.02.037 ↗
59. A study of the DRASTIC methodology with emphasis on Swedish conditions10.1111/j.1745-6584.1994.tb00642.x ↗
60. Recharge and nitrate transport through the deep vadose zone of the Loess Plateau: A regional-scale model investigation10.1029/2017WR022190 ↗