journal article·2025-03-06Open access

Privacy Illusion: Subliminal Channels in Schnorr-like Blind-Signature Schemes

Mirosław Kutyłowski, Oliwer Sobolewski

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 5

Abstract

Blind signatures are one of the key techniques of Privacy-Enhancing Technologies (PETs). They appear as a component of many schemes, including, in particular, the Privacy Pass technology. Blind-signature schemes provide provable privacy: the signer cannot derive any information about a message signed at user’s request. Unfortunately, in practice, this might be just an illusion. We consider a novel but realistic threat model where the user does not participate in the protocol directly but instead uses a provided black-box device. We then show that the black-box device may be implemented in such a way that, despite a provably secure unblinding procedure, a malicious signer can link the signing protocol transcript with a resulting unblinded signature. Additionally, we show how to transmit any short covert message between the black-box device and the signer. We prove the stealthiness of these attacks in anamorphic cryptography model, where the attack cannot be detected even if all private keys are given to an auditor. At the same time, an auditor will not detect any irregular behavior even if the secret keys of the signer and the device are revealed for audit purposes (anamorphic cryptography model). We analyze the following schemes: (1) Schnorr blind signatures, (2) Tessaro–Zhu blind signatures, and their extensions. We provide a watchdog countermeasure and conclude that similar solutions are necessary in practical implementations to defer most of the threats.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cryptography and Data Security · Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting · Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

NASK—National Research Institute, 01-045 Warsaw, Poland

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Chaum, D., Rivest, R.L., and Sherman, A.T. (1982, January 23–25). Blind Signatures for Untraceable Payments. Proceedings of the Advances in Cryptology—CRYPTO’82, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
2. Sadeghi, A.-R., Gligor, V.D., and Yung, M. (2013, January 4–8). Anonymous credentials light. Proceedings of the 2013 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer & Communications Security, CCS ’13, Berlin, Germany.
3. Privacy Pass: Bypassing Internet Challenges Anonymously10.1515/popets-2018-0026 ↗
4. Google (2024, January 03). How the VPN by Google One Works | Google One. Available online: https://web.archive.org/web/20231226211122/https://one.google.com/about/vpn/howitworks.
5. Apple (2021). iCloud Private Relay Overview, Apple. Available online: https://www.apple.com/icloud/docs/iCloud_Private_Relay_Overview_Dec2021.pdf.
6. Michael, D., Bailey, M.D., and Greenstadt, R. (2021, January 11–13). Pretty Good Phone Privacy. Proceedings of the 30th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 21), Online. Available online: https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity21/presentation/schmitt.
7. European Parliament and the Council (2025, March 04). Regulation (EU) 2024/1183 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1183/oj.
8. Baum, C., Blazy, O., Camenisch, J., Hoepman, J.H., Lee, E., Lehmann, A., Lysyanskaya, A., Mayrhofer, R., Montgomery, H., and Nguyen, N.K. (2025, January 20). Cryptographers’ Feedback on the EU Digital Identity’s ARF. Available online: https://github.com/eu-digital-identity-wallet/eudi-doc-architecture-and-reference-framework/discussions/211.
9. European Parliament and the Council (2025, January 20). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the Protection of Natural Persons with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of Such Data, and Repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (Text with EEA Relevance). Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj/eng.
10. Apple, and Google (2025, January 20). Exposure Notification Privacy-Preserving Analytics (ENPA) White Paper. Available online: https://covid19-static.cdn-apple.com/applications/covid19/current/static/contact-tracing/pdf/ENPA_White_Paper.pdf.
11. Thuraisingham, B., Evans, D., Malkin, T., and Xu, D. (November, January 30). The Return of Coppersmith’s Attack: Practical Factorization of Widely Used RSA Moduli. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, CCS ’17, Dallas, TX, USA.
12. Chaum, D. (1983, January 21–24). The Prisoners’ Problem and the Subliminal Channel. Proceedings of the Advances in Cryptology, Proceedings of CRYPTO ’83, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
13. Young, A.L., and Yung, M. (2004). Malicious Cryptography—Exposing Cryptovirology, John Wiley & Sons.10.1016/S0267-3649(04)00079-2 ↗
14. Anamorphic Encryption: Private Communication Against a Dictator10.1007/978-3-031-07085-3_2 ↗
15. Kutyłowski, M., Lauks-Dutka, A., Kubiak, P., and Zawada, M. (2024). FIDO2 Facing Kleptographic Threats By-Design. Appl. Sci., 14.10.20944/preprints202410.2234.v1 ↗
16. Supervised Usage of Signature Creation Devices
17. Wallet Databases with Observers
18. Efficient Signature Generation by Smart Cards10.1007/BF00196725 ↗
19. Short Pairing-Free Blind Signatures with Exponential Security10.1007/978-3-031-07085-3_27 ↗
20. Pairing-Free Blind Signatures from CDH Assumptions10.1007/978-3-031-68376-3_6 ↗
21. Snowblind: A Threshold Blind Signature in Pairing-Free Groups10.1007/978-3-031-38557-5_23 ↗
22. Security of blind digital signatures10.1007/BFb0052233 ↗
23. Provably secure blind signature schemes10.1007/BFb0034852 ↗
24. Non-interactive Blind Signatures for Random Messages10.1007/978-3-031-30589-4_25 ↗
25. Non-Interactive Blind Signatures: Post-Quantum and Stronger Security10.1007/978-981-96-0888-1_3 ↗
26. The Abe-Okamoto Partially Blind Signature Scheme Revisited10.1007/978-3-031-22972-5_10 ↗
27. Anamorphic Signatures: Secrecy from a Dictator Who Only Permits Authentication!10.1007/978-3-031-38545-2_25 ↗
28. Thuraisingham, B., Evans, D., Malkin, T., and Xu, D. (November, January 30). Generic Semantic Security against a Kleptographic Adversary. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, CCS ’17, Dallas, TX, USA.
29. Subversion-Resilient Public Key Encryption with Practical Watchdogs10.1007/978-3-030-75245-3_23 ↗
30. Security of Blind Discrete Log Signatures against Interactive Attacks10.1007/3-540-45600-7_1 ↗
31. On the (in)Security of ROS10.1007/978-3-030-77870-5_2 ↗
32. Sadeghi, A.-R., Gligor, V.D., and Yung, M. (2013, January 4–8). Elligator: Elliptic-Curve Points Indistinguishable from Uniform Random Strings. Proceedings of the 2013 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer & Communications Security, CCS ’13, Berlin, Germany.
33. Correlated-Input Secure Hash Functions
34. Snowblind: A Threshold Blind Signature in Pairing-Free Groups
35. Pairing-Free Blind Signatures from CDH Assumptions