Time-Efficient Path Planner in 3D Obstacle-Rich Environments Considering the Maximum Turn Rate of a Fixed-Wing Aerial Vehicle
Source abstract
Abstract
A time-efficient path plan algorithm is important for the real-time navigation of a fixed-wing autonomous aerial vehicle in unknown 3D obstacle-rich environments. Note that a fixed-wing aerial vehicle can freely move in 3D environments, not in 2D environments. This research addresses a 3D path planner, which is time-efficient in generating a safe and short path to the destination. In practice, a fixed-wing aerial vehicle has a limited turn rate due to its acceleration limits. The proposed path plan algorithm constructs a smooth 3D path by considering the maximum turn rate of a fixed-wing aerial vehicle. It is proven that the planned 3D path avoids collision with obstacles, while satisfying the turn rate limit constraints. Through computer simulations, one proves the outperformance (low computational load, satisfying maneuverability constraints, and short path length) of the proposed 3D path plan algorithm by comparing it with the state-of-the-art 3D rapidly exploring random tree (RRT)-based path planners considering maneuverability constraints.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Robotic Path Planning Algorithms · Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization · Control and Dynamics of Mobile Robots
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
System Engineering Department, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea
Funding
Korean government (MSIT)
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Drones for automated parcel delivery: Use case identification and derivation of technical requirements
2. Ma, Z., and Chen, J. (2023). Multi-UAV Urban Logistics Task Allocation Method Based on MCTS. Drones, 7.10.3390/drones7110679 ↗
3. Altinses, D., Salazar Torres, D.O., Schwung, M., Lier, S., and Schwung, A. (2024). Optimizing Drone Logistics: A Scoring Algorithm for Enhanced Decision Making across Diverse Domains in Drone Airlines. Drones, 8.10.3390/drones8070307 ↗
4. Yang, L., Qi, J., Xiao, J., and Yong, X. (July, January 29). A literature review of UAV 3D path planning. Proceedings of the 11th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, Shenyang, China.
5. UAV photogrammetry in the post-earthquake scenario: Case studies in L’Aquila10.1080/19475705.2016.1176605 ↗
6. Three-dimensional multi-robot control to chase a target while not being observed10.1177/1729881419829667 ↗
7. Three dimensional tracking of a maneuvering emitter utilizing doppler-bearing measurements of a constant velocity observer10.1016/j.sigpro.2021.108246 ↗
8. Pereira, A.A., Binney, J., Jones, B.H., Ragan, M., and Sukhatme, G.S. (2011, January 25–30). Toward risk aware mission planning for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1109/IROS.2011.6048756 ↗
9. Integration of risk in hierarchical path planning of underwater vehicles10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.10.347 ↗
10. Path Planning for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles10.1109/TRO.2007.895057 ↗
11. Blasi, L., D’Amato, E., Notaro, I., and Raspaolo, G. (2023). Clothoid-Based Path Planning for a Formation of Fixed-Wing UAVs. Electronics, 12.10.3390/electronics12102204 ↗
12. Motion Planning for a Fixed-Wing UAV in Urban Environments10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.03.090 ↗
13. Zhang, H., Zhang, Y., Guo, C., Wang, T., Fan, L., Hu, J., Xu, Z., Dou, Z., Zhang, K., and Liang, J. (2022, January 27–30). Path planning for fixed-wing UAVs based on expert knowledge and improved VFH in cluttered environments. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 17th International Conference on Control & Automation (ICCA), Naples, Italy.10.1109/ICCA54724.2022.9831848 ↗
14. Fang, Y., Yao, Y., Zhu, F., and Chen, K. (2023). Piecewise-potential-field-based path planning method for fixed-wing UAV formation. Sci. Rep., 13.10.1038/s41598-023-28087-0 ↗
15. Time optimal path planning considering acceleration limits10.1016/j.robot.2003.09.007 ↗
16. Hauert, S., Leven, S., Varga, M., Ruini, F., Cangelosi, A., Zufferey, J.C., and Floreano, D. (2011, January 25–30). Reynolds flocking in reality with fixed-wing robots: Communication range vs. maximum turning rate. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1109/IROS.2011.6048729 ↗
17. Barghi Jond, H., Nabiyev, V.V., and Akbarimajd, A. (2014, January 23–25). Planning of mobile robots under limitted velocity and acceleration. Proceedings of the 2014 22nd Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU), Trabzon, Turkey.10.1109/SIU.2014.6830545 ↗
18. Jaillet, L., Hoffman, J., van den Berg, J., Abbeel, P., Porta, J.M., and Goldberg, K. (2011, January 25–30). EG-RRT: Environment-guided random trees for kinodynamic motion planning with uncertainty and obstacles. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1109/IROS.2011.6048409 ↗
19. Bassolillo, S.R., Raspaolo, G., Blasi, L., D’Amato, E., and Notaro, I. (2024). Path Planning for Fixed-Wing Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: An Integrated Approach with Theta* and Clothoids. Drones, 8.10.3390/drones8020062 ↗
20. Application of the Improved Grey Wolf Algorithm in Spacecraft Maneuvering Path Planning10.1155/2022/8857584 ↗
21. Spacecraft attitude maneuver planning with multi–sensor pointing constraints using improved RRT–star algorithm10.1016/j.asr.2023.04.024 ↗
22. Kroumov, V., and Yu, J. (2009, January 26–29). 3D path planning for mobile robots using annealing neural network. Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control, Hangzhou, China.10.1109/ICNSC.2009.4919259 ↗
23. ABA*–Adaptive Bidirectional A* Algorithm for Aerial Robot Path Planning10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3317918 ↗
24. Choset, H., Lynch, K.M., Hutchinson, S., Kantor, G.A., Burgard, W., Kavraki, L.E., and Thrun, S. (2005). Principles of Robot Motion, MIT Press.
25. Stealth Path Planning for a High Speed Torpedo-Shaped Autonomous Underwater Vehicle to Approach a Target Ship10.1080/23335777.2018.1431959 ↗
26. A new approach to all-pairs shortest paths on real-weighted graphs10.1016/S0304-3975(03)00402-X ↗
27. Muñoz, P., and Rodriguez-Moreno, M. (2012, January 6–8). Improving efficiency in any-angle path-planning algorithms. Proceedings of the 2012 6th IEEE International Conference Intelligent Systems, Sofia, Bulgaria.10.1109/IS.2012.6335138 ↗
28. Nash, A., Daniel, K., Koenig, S., and Felner, A. (2007, January 22–26). Theta*: Any-Angle Path Planning on Grids. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
29. Kuffner, J., and LaValle, S.M. (2011, January 25–30). Space-Filling Trees: A New Perspective on Incremental Search for Motion Planning. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1109/IROS.2011.6048346 ↗
30. Sampling-based algorithms for optimal motion planning10.1177/0278364911406761 ↗
31. Urmson, C., and Simmons, R. (2003, January 27–31). Approaches for heuristically biasing RRT growth. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Interlligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Las Vegas, NV, USA.
32. Fossen, T.I. (1994). Guidance and Control of Ocean Vehicles, John Wiley and Sons.
33. Robotics, A. (2025, February 19). Rotation. Website, 2024. Available online: https://articulatedrobotics.xyz/tutorials/coordinate-transforms/rotations-3d/.
34. NR-RRT: Neural Risk-Aware Near-Optimal Path Planning in Uncertain Nonconvex Environments10.1109/TASE.2022.3215562 ↗
35. HILS setup of dynamic flight path planning in 3D environment with flexible mission planning using Ground Station10.1016/j.jfranklin.2009.02.012 ↗
36. (2025, February 19). Python. Array Bisection Algorithm. Website, 2024. Available online: https://docs.python.org/3/library/bisect.html.