Development of inclusions in 3104 alloy melt during heating and holding treatments
Source abstract
Abstract
Developments in the contents of different typical inclusions in 3104 alloy melt were described during heating and holding processing. The settling process of inclusion particles was investigated by measuring the contents of inclusions in the surface, center, and bottom layers of the molten metal. In the results, main inclusions observed and determined by Prefil and PoDFA methods are MgO, Al2O3, spinel (MgAl2O4), and TiB2 particles or thin films. It is found that some small particles of Al2O3 and MgO are transformed into spinel particles, and the formation rate increases as the temperature and the holding period of melt increase. The content of inclusions increases from 3.37 mm2•kg-1 to 7.54 mm2•kg-1 and then decreases to 3.08 mm2•kg-1 after holding for 90 min. This is attributed to a settling phenomenon and a significant increase in settling velocity after holding for 60 min. The content of inclusion particles decreases by means of settlement and flotation in liquid aluminum with an increase in holding time. The theoretical analysis and experiment results are in essential agreement with those from industrial production.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics · Solidification and crystal growth phenomena
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. S. D. Kumar, A. Mandal, and M. Chakraborty, Solid fraction evolution characteristics of semi-solid A356 alloy and in-situ A356–TiB2 composites investigated by differential thermal analysis, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 22(2015), No. 4, p. 389.10.1007/s12613-015-1084-0 ↗
2. Z.W. Chen, Q.Y. Fan, and K. Zhao, Microstructure and microhardness of nanostructured Al-4.6Cu-Mn alloy ribbons, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 22(2015), No. 8, p. 860.10.1007/s12613-015-1143-6 ↗
3. L. Liu and F.H. Samuel, Assessment of melt cleanliness in A356.2 aluminum casting alloy using the porous disc filtration apparatus technique: Part I. Inclusion measurements, J. Mater. Sci., 32(1997), No. 22, p. 5901.10.1023/A:1018602725185 ↗
4. C.J. Simensen, The effect of melt refining upon inclusions in aluminum, Metall. Trans. B, 13(1982), No. 1, p. 31.10.1007/BF02666952 ↗
5. D. Apelian and R. Mutharasan, Filtration: a melt refining method, JOM, 32(1980), No. 9, p. 14.10.1007/BF03354512 ↗
6. M.M. Jaradeh and T. Carlberg, Method developed for quantitative analysis of inclusions in solidified aluminum ingots, Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 42(2011), No. 1, p. 121.10.1007/s11663-010-9463-4 ↗
7. B. Ren, Z. Li, and J.G. Morris, Correlation between the preferred grain orientation and the deep-drawing behavior of AA 3104 and AA 5052 aluminum alloy sheets, Scripta Mater., 31(1994), No. 4, p. 387.10.1016/0956-716X(94)90005-1 ↗
8. T.M. Yu, C.R. Brooks, and S. Goodrich, The effect of cold working and annealing practice on earing in 3104 Al alloy sheet, Mater. Charact., 30(1993), No. 4, p. 251.10.1016/1044-5803(93)90072-4 ↗
9. P.G. Enright, I.R. Hughes, J. Pickering, A. Simard, and J. Proulx, Characterisation of molten metal quality using the pressure filtration technique, [in] Annual Meeting of the American Foundry Society (AFS), 107th Casting Congress, Milwaukee, US, 2003.
10. C. Dupuis and R. Dumont, The impact of LIMCA technology on the optimization of metal cleanliness, [in] Light Metals, TMS Annual Meeting, Warrendale, 1993, p. 332.
11. O. Majidi, S.G. Shabestari, and M.R. Aboutalebi, Study of fluxing temperature in molten aluminum refining process, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 182(2007), No. 1-3, p. 450.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.09.003 ↗
12. L.N.W. Damoah and L. Zhang, Removal of inclusions from aluminum through filtration, Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 41(2010), No. 8, p. 886.10.1007/s11663-010-9367-3 ↗
13. T.A. Utigard and I.D. Sommerville, Cleanliness of aluminum and steel: a comparison of assessment methods, [in] Light Metal, TMS Annual Meeting, Warrendale, 2005, p. 951
14. T. Magnusson, Porosity and Feeding in Aluminum–Silicon Foundry Alloys [Dissertation], Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, 2000, p. 15.
15. B. Sarina, Filtration of Aluminium: Experiments, Wetting and Modeling [Dissertation], Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, 2011, p. 23.
16. C. Simensen and G. Berg, A survey of inclusions in aluminum, Aluminum, 56(1980), p. 335.
17. R. Raiszadeh and W.D. Griffiths, The effect of holding liquid aluminum alloys on oxide film content, Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 42(2011), No. 1, p. 133.10.1007/s11663-010-9439-4 ↗
18. Z.S. Ren, X.J. Hu, X.M. Hou, X.X. Xue, and K.C. Chou, Dissolution and diffusion of TiO2 in the CaO–Al2O3–SiO2 slag, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 21(2014), No. 4, p. 345.10.1007/s12613-014-0915-8 ↗