journal article·2025-02-13Open access

Depositional History Reconstruction of the Miocene Formations in the Carpathian Foredeep Area Based on the Integration of Seismostratigraphic and Chemostratigraphic Interpretation

Anna Łaba-Biel, Andrzej Urbaniec, Benedykt Kubik, Anna Kwietniak, Robert Bartoń

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 4

Abstract

Detailed recognition of the paleoenvironment of sedimentation for the monotonous series of heterolithic sediments of the Machow Formation in the central part of the Carpathian Foredeep is still relatively poor. This study presents an unconventional approach of integrating results of seismostratigraphic interpretation with conclusions from analyses of chemostratigraphic profiles in boreholes. The results obtained from the studies allowed the resolution of the seismic data to be increased, enabling it to be accurately tied to the well data. The studies showed a high consistency between results obtained by the two methods mentioned above, and their combination provided a range of additional information and conclusions that could not be drawn from using a single method. The possibility of correlating interpreted sedimentary sequences with specific elements of the paleoenvironment and stages of the depositional history of the analyzed sedimentary basin was also demonstrated. An important benefit of the integrated interpretation methodology used is the possibility to recognize an apparently monotonous profile of heterolithic formations, which was previously not possible with standard interpretation methods.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geological Formations and Processes Exploration · Geological and Geochemical Analysis · Geological Studies and Exploration

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Oil and Gas Institute—National Research Institute, 25A Lubicz Str., 31-503 Cracow, Poland

Faculty of Geology, Geophysics and Environmental Protection, University of Science and Technology AGH, 30 Mickiewicz Av., 30-059 Kraków, Poland

Funding

Oil and Gas Institute-National Research Institute (OGI-NRI) commissioned by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education · AGH University of Krakow · Excellence initiative—research university for the AGH University of Krakow

References (91)

Show source-provided references
1. Tight gas exploration in the Pannonian Basin
2. Source rocks and petroleum systems in the Hungarian part of the Pannonian Basin: The potential for shale gas and shale oil plays10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2011.08.015 ↗
3. Low permeability Neogene lithofacies in Northern Croatia as potential unconventional hydrocarbon reservoirs
4. On the tectonostratigraphic evolution and hydrocarbon systems of extensional back-arc basins: Inferences from 2D basin modelling from the Pannonian basin10.1007/s40328-018-0225-0 ↗
5. Some Aspects of Neogene Biostratigraphic in the Pannonian Basin. The Pannonian Basin: A Study in Basin Evolution Basin Evolution
6. Towards a new time scale for the Upper Miocene continental series of the Pannonian basin (Central Paratethys)10.5194/smsps-3-79-2002 ↗
7. Review of Miocene shallow marine and lacustrine depositional environments in Northern Croatia
8. Sedimentology and stratigraphy of the Neogene rift-type North Croatian Basin (Pannonian Basin System, Croatia): A review10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2018.01.026 ↗
9. The development of the Carpathian Foredeep between Tarnow and Przemysl, Polish eastern Carpathians
10. The Western Carpathian Foredeep—Development of the foreland basin in front of the accretionary wedge and its burial history (Poland)
11. Contrasting tectonic and sedimentary history of the central and eastern parts of the Polish Carpathian foredeep basin—Results of seismic data interpretation)10.1016/S0264-8172(00)00037-4 ↗
12. Origin and sequential development of Badenian-Sarmatian clinoforms in the Carpathian Foreland Basin (SE Poland)
13. Hyperpycnal flows and deltaic clinoforms—Implications for sedimentological interpretations of late Middle Miocene fill in the Carpathian Foredeep Basin
14. Middle Miocene deposits in Carpathian foredeep: Facies analysis and implications for hydrocarbon reservoir prospecting
15. Łaba-Biel, A., Kwietniak, A., and Urbaniec, A. (2020). Seismic Identification of Unconventional Heterogenous Reservoirs Based on Depositional History—A Case Study of the Polish Carpathian Foredeep. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13226036 ↗
16. Mineralogical characteristics of the heterolithic formations from the Carpathian Foredeep Miocene sediments, south-eastern Poland10.7494/geol.2022.48.3.219 ↗
17. Rakuš, M. (1998). Palinspastic reconstruction of the Carpathian-Pannonian region during the Miocene. Geodynamic Development of the Western Carpathians, Geological Survey of Slovak Republic (GSSR).
18. Closson, D. (2011). Structure and plate tectonic evolution of the northern Outer Carpathians. Tectonics, NTECH.10.5772/567 ↗
19. Urbaniec, A., Łaba-Biel, A., Kwietniak, A., and Fashagba, I. (2021). Seismostratigraphic Interpretation of Upper Cretaceous Reservoir from the Carpathian Foreland, Southern Poland. Energies, 14.10.3390/en14227776 ↗
20. Example of seismostratigraphic and tectonostratigraphic interpretation of the Miocene sediments from the central part of the Carpathian Foredeep
21. Catuneanu, O. (2006). Principles of Sequence Similarity. Wyd, Elsevier.
22. Sequence Stratigraphy: Methodology and Nomenclature10.1127/0078-0421/2011/0011 ↗
23. Sequence stratigraphy in the context of the ‘modeling revolution’10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2020.104309 ↗
24. Diagenesis/anchimetamorphism boundary in rocks of the uppermost Proterozoic and Cambrian from the eastern part of the Malopolska block determined on the basis of clay minerals studies
25. Tectonic subdivision of Poland: Southern Poland (Upper Silesian Block and Małopolska Block)
26. More evidence on Neoproterozoic terranes in southern Poland and southeastern Romania
27. Organic microfossil assemblages from the late Ediacaran rocks of the Małopolska Block, southeastern Poland
28. Ordovician between Pilzno and Busko in the Carpathian Foreland (Southern Poland)
29. Precambrian and Palaeozoic basement of the Carpathian Foredeep and the adjacent outer Carpathians (SE Poland andWestern Ukraine)
30. Stratigraphy and facies development of the Devonian and Lower Carboniferous in southern part of the Carpathian Fordeep
31. Geological structure of Miocene Substratum in Kraków-Pilzno Region. Part I. Precambrian and palaeozoic period
32. Results of the structural interpretation of Triassic and Palaeozoic formations of the Carpathian Foreland based on new seismic data10.18668/NG.2020.09.01 ↗
33. Upper Jurassic and Lower Cretaceous of the middle Polish Carpathian Foreland
34. Development of the Mid-Polish Trough versus Late Jurassic evolution in the Carpathian Foredeep area
35. Lithostratigraphy and micropalaeontological characteristic of Lower Cretaceous strata in central part of the Carpathian Foreland
36. The Permian and Triassic of the Polish Carpathian Foreland10.5604/08676143.1113256 ↗
37. The Early–Middle Carpathian peripheral foreland basin (Western Carpathians, Poland)
38. Lithostratigraphy of the Miocen deposits in the easteen part of the Carpathian Foredeep
39. Biostratigraphy of Neogene in the Carpathian Foredeep in the light of new micropalaeontological data
40. Basic lithostratigraphic units of the Miocene of the Carpathian Foredeep
41. Miocene deposition in the eastern part of the Carpathian Foredeep inPoland
42. Sarmatian paleoecological environment of the Machow Formation based on the quantitative Nannofossil analysis—Case study from Sokołów area (Polish Carpathian Foredeep)10.2478/v10096-012-0022-6 ↗
43. Nannoplankton stratigraphy of the Miocene deposits in Tarnobrzeg area (northeastern part of the Carpathian Foredeep)
44. New biostratigraphic data and an attempt of correlation of Miocene formations in the basement of the Western Carpathians
45. Biostratigraphy of the Early Miocene of the Southern Poland based on planctic foraminifera and calcareous nannoplankton
46. Correlation of Late Badenian salts of the Wieliczka, Bochnia and Kalush areas (Polish and Ukrainian Carpathian Foredeep)
47. Development of research on Western Carpathian Miocene deposits in the Bielsko—Kraków area
48. Carpathian Foredeep Basin (Poland and Ukraine): Its Sedimentary, Structural, and Geodynamic Evolution
49. The Stebnyk Formation (Miocene) in the Boryslav–Pokuttya and Sambir nappes of the Ukrainian Carpathians: A record of environmental change in the Carpathian Foredeep
50. Ligtenberg, H., de Bruin, G., Hemstra, N., and Geel, C.R. (2006, January 12–15). Sequence Stratigraphic Interpretation in the Wheeler Transformed (Flattened) Seismic Domain. Proceedings of the 68th European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers Conference and Exhibition, incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2006, Vienna, Austria. EAGE 2006: Opportunities in Mature Areas.10.3997/2214-4609.201402337 ↗
51. Unravelling a Carbonate System: Technical Advances in Seismic Sequence Stratigraphy
52. Using 3D Wheeler Diagrams in Seismic Interpretation—The Horizon Cube Method10.3997/1365-2397.30.3.56681 ↗
53. Siliciclastic resevoir rocks; the petroleum system—From source to trap
54. Cretaceous Tectonostratigraphy and the Development of the Cauvery Basin, Southeast India10.1144/1354-079307-747 ↗
55. Determination of Potential Hydrocarbon and Tectonostatigraphy Analysis Based on 2D Seismic in Padamarang Sub-Basin, Bone Basin, South Part of Sulawesi
56. Tectonostratigraphy as a Basis for Paleotectonic Reconstructions. Moscow Univ
57. Mantilla, O., Castellanos, J., Ramirez, V., Hurtado, D., and Rubio, C. (2013, January 8–11). Tectono–stratigraphic events of the Northern Caribbean Offshore, Colombia. Proceedings of the AAPG International Conference and Exhibition, Cartagena, Colombia. AAPG Search and Discovery Article #30292.
58. Craigie, N. (2018). Principles of Elemental Chemostratigraphy, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-71216-1 ↗
59. Ramkumar, M. (2015). Chemostratigraphy: Concepts, Techniques and Applications, Elsevier.
60. Application of chemostratigraphy in multivariate statistical analysis to differentiating bounding stratigraphic surfaces
61. Geochemistry and palynology of the upper Albian at the Abu Gharadig Basin, southern Tethys: Constraints on the oceanic anoxic event 1d10.1002/gj.3810 ↗
62. Comparing natural and artificial thermal maturation of a Type II-S source rock, Late Cretaceous, Israel10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2020.104773 ↗
63. Multi-elemental chemostratigraphy of Triassic mudstones in eastern Svalbard: Implications for source rock formation in front of the World’s largest delta plain10.1002/dep2.182 ↗
64. Applications of chemostratigraphy in Middle Jurassic unconventional reservoirs in eastern Saudi Arabia10.2113/geoarabia200279 ↗
65. Kowalska, S., Kubik, B., Skupio, R., and Wolański, K. (2020). Downhole lithological profile reconstruction based on chemical composition of core samples and drill cuttings measured with portable X-ray fluorescences spectrometer. Minerals, 10.10.3390/min10121101 ↗
66. Reservoir characterization and multiscale heterogeneity modeling of inclined heterolithic strata for bitumen-production forecasting, McMurray Formation, Corner, Alberta, Canada10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.02.003 ↗
67. Corfield, S., Sharp, I., Häger, K.O., Dreyer, T., and Underhill, J. (2001). An Integrated Study of the Garn and Melke Formations (Middle to Upper Jurassic) of the Smorbukk Area, Halten Terrace, Mid-Norway, Elsevier. Norwegian Petroleum Society Special Publications.10.1016/S0928-8937(01)80014-X ↗
68. Evolution of the Miocene deposits of the Carpathian Foredeep in the vicinity of Rzeszów (the Sokołów–Smolarzyny 3D seismic survey area)
69. Seismogeologic documentation of prospects for new gas discoveries in Miocene sandstones under the Carpathian overthrust between Husów and Przemyśl
70. Application of multivariate sta tis ti cal methods for characterizing heterolithic reservoirs based on wire line logs—Example from the Carpathian Foredeep Basin (Middle Miocene, SE Poland)
71. Interpretation of a gas chimney in the Polish Carpathian Foredeep based on integrated seismic and geochemical data10.1111/bre.12216 ↗
72. Verification of bright spots in the presence of thin beds by AVO and spectral analysis in Miocene sediments of Carpathian Foredeep10.1007/s11600-019-00324-z ↗
73. Possibility of a more detailed seismic interpretation within the Miocene formations of the Carpathian Foredeep based on the well logs interpretation10.18668/NG.2019.09.02 ↗
74. A calcite crisis unravelling Early Miocene (Ottnangian) stratigraphy in the North Alpine–Carpathian Foreland Basin: A litho- and chemostratigraphic marker for the Rzehakia Lake System10.1515/geoca-2018-0019 ↗
75. Hülscher, J., Fischer, G., Grunert, P., Auer, G., and Bernhardt, A. (2019). Selective Recording of Tectonic Forcings in an Oligocene/Miocene Submarine Channel System: Insights from New Age Constraints and Sediment Volumes From the Austrian Northern Alpine Foreland Basin. Front. Earth Sci., 7.10.3389/feart.2019.00302 ↗
76. Badenian–Sarmatian boundary in geochemical record in the Carpathian Foredeep area: Stratigraphic implications
77. Geochemical features of the Badenian–Sarmatian boundary series of the Miocene evaporite overburden in the Busko (Młyny) PIG-1 and Kazimierza Wielka (Donosy) PIG-1 boreholes, northern part of the Carpathian Foredeep
78. Chemostratigraphy in Miocene heterozoan carbonate settings: Applications, limitations and perspectives10.1144/GSL.SP.2006.255.01.18 ↗
79. The use of chemostratigraphy to refine ambiguous sequence stratigraphic correlations in marine mudrocks. An example from the Woodford Shale, Oklahoma, USA10.1144/jgs2015-125 ↗
80. Stratigraphy, isotope geochemistry, seismic stratigraphy and paleogeography of the Lagoa do Jacaré Formation, Bambuí Foreland Basin (Ediacaran-Cambrian), Southeast Brazil10.1016/j.jsames.2022.104137 ↗
81. Mudrock sequence stratigraphy: A multi-proxy (sedimentological, paleobiological and geochemical) approach, Devonian Appalachian Basin10.1016/j.palaeo.2010.10.010 ↗
82. Haynesville and Bossier mudrocks: A facies and sequence stratigraphic investigation, East Texas and Louisiana, USA10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2011.10.001 ↗
83. Unconventional methods for unconventional plays: Using elemental data to understand shale resource plays
84. Chemostratigraphy of the Haynesville Shale
85. Organic matter accumulation in the Upper Devonian Duvernay Formation, Western Canada Sedimentary Basin, from sequence stratigraphic analysis and geochemical proxies10.1016/j.sedgeo.2018.09.004 ↗
86. The Cambrian-Ordovician boundary in the Tarim Basin, NW China: Geochemistry and geophysics data anomalies10.1016/j.petrol.2017.06.034 ↗
87. Tectonostratigraphy of the Nieuwerkerk Formation (Delfland subgroup), West Netherlands Basin
88. Depositional sequences in northern Peru: New insights on the palaeogeographic and palaeotectonic reconstruction of western Gondwana during late Permian and Triassic10.1144/jgs2020-186 ↗
89. Palinspastic reconstruction of the palaeogeography of the Badenian salinary basin in Poland
90. Badenian olisthostromes and turbidity fans near Tarnow (Middle Carpathian Foreland)
91. Characteristics of the conglomerate-olistostrome series in the Szczurowa–Wojnicz paleovalley based on an interpretation of seismic image10.18668/NG.2021.11.01 ↗