Investigation of a Driver’s Reaction Time and Reading Accuracy of Speedometers on Different Instrument Clusters of Passenger Cars
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents an experimental investigation of drivers’ reading reaction times and errors when reading a speedometer as a part of a complex instrument cluster. The laboratory-based experiment involved 32 participants and 7 instrument clusters from existing passenger cars. The objective of this study was to analyze the effects of different instrument cluster (IC) designs on the time and accuracy of information retrieval from the speedometer, including correlations with participants’ age and gender. Reaction times ranged from 451 ms to 11,116 ms. Reading accuracy was assessed based on the number of coarse errors, among other factors. The results indicated no influence of participants’ gender on performance, while a moderate positive correlation was observed between reaction time and participants’ age. Specific design features of both the speedometer and the IC that could be related to the results were identified. From the point of view of both reaction time and reading accuracy, centrally located speedometers (whether digital or analog) were found to be more effective. The highest number of coarse errors occurred when participants misread information, attributed to unfavorable layouts and designs of two instrument clusters.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Safety Warnings and Signage · Vehicle emissions and performance · Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanization and Design Engineering, Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
Department of Motor Vehicles and Motors, Faculty of Engineering, University of Kragujevac, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia
Funding
Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation · Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Bhise, V. (2012). Ergonomics in the Automotive Design Process, Taylor & Francis Group.
2. Bubb, H., Bengler, K., Grünen, R.E., and Vollrath, M. (2021). Automotive Ergonomics, Springer.10.1007/978-3-658-33941-8 ↗
3. Some pictures of the history of automotive instrumentation10.1002/jsid.536 ↗
4. Gartner, N.H., Messer, C.J., and Rathi, A.K. (2000). Human factors, Chapter 3, Traffic Flow Theory Transportation Research Board Monograph.
5. Campbell, J.L., Brown, J.L., Graving, J.S., Richard, C.M., Lichty, M.G., Sanquist, T., Bacon, P., Woods, R., Li, H., and Williams, D.N. (2016). Human Factors Design Guidance for Driver-Vehicle Interfaces, Report No. DOT HS 812 360.
6. Kroon, E.C.M., Martens, M.H., Brookhuis, K.A., Hagenzieker, M.P., Alferdinck, J.W.A.M., Harms, I.M., and Hof, T. (2016). Human Factor Guidelines for the Design of Safe In-Car Traffic Information Services. Smart Mobility Round Table Human Factors, Guideline, Delft University of Technology. [2nd ed.].
7. (2017). Road Vehicles—Ergonomic Aspects of Transport Information and Control Systems—Specifications and Test Procedures for In-Vehicle Visual Presentation (Standard No. Standard ISO 15008: 2017).
8. Drivers’ User-interface Information Prioritization in Manual and Autonomous Vehicles10.1007/s12239-020-0128-2 ↗
9. Gauges design for a digital instrument cluster: Efficiency, visual capture, and satisfaction assessment for truck driving10.1016/j.ergon.2019.06.004 ↗
10. (2012). Road Vehicles—Ergonomic Aspects of Transportation and Control Systems—Dialogue Management Principles and Compliance Procedures (Standard No. Standard ISO 15005: 2012).
11. Effect of a Head-Up Versus Head-Down Digital Speedometer on Visual Sampling Behavior and Speed Control Performance During Daytime Automobile Driving. SAE Trans
12. Effects of congestion on drivers’ speed choice: Assessing the mediating role of state aggressiveness based on taxi floating car data10.1016/j.aap.2018.04.030 ↗
13. Driver behavior and performances on in-vehicle display based speed compliance10.1016/j.aap.2021.106390 ↗
14. Ideation using the “Design with Intent” toolkit: A case study applying a design toolkit to support creativity in developing vehicle interfaces for fuel-efficient driving10.1016/j.apergo.2019.103026 ↗
15. Visualizing distances as a function of speed: Design and evaluation of a distance-speedometer10.1016/j.trf.2019.05.012 ↗
16. Quan, Y., Shenjun, T., Kaifeng, L., and Yibing, L. (2013, January 16–17). Investigation and Analysis of Drivers’ Speedometer Observation and Vehicle-speed Cognition. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation, Hong Kong, China.
17. The Effects of Distraction Type and Difficulty on Older Drivers’ Performance and Behaviour: Visual vs. Cognitive10.1007/s12239-021-0011-9 ↗
18. Effects of visual complexity of in-vehicle information display: Age-related differences in visual search task in the driving context10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102888 ↗
19. Weiss, B.P. (2017). Examining the Relationship Between Age and Instrument Cluster Design Preference. [Master Thesis, University of Michigan-Dearborn].
20. Digital, analogue, or redundant speedometers for truck driving: Impact on visual distraction and usability10.1016/j.apergo.2017.05.013 ↗
21. Olaverri-Monreal, C., Lehsing, C., Trubswetter, N., Schepp, C.A., and Bengler, K. (2013, January 23–26). In-Vehicle Displays: Driving Information Prioritization and Visualization. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), Gold Coast, Australia.10.1109/IVS.2013.6629542 ↗
22. Stromberg, H., Andersson, P., Almgren, S., Ericsson, J., Karlsson, M.A., and Nabo, A. (December, January 30). Driver Interfaces for Electric Vehicles. Proceedings of the Automotive UI 2011, Salzburg, Austria.10.1145/2381416.2381445 ↗
23. Sanders, M., and McCormick, E. (1993). Human Factors in Engineering and Design, McGraw-Hill.
24. (2009). Road Vehicles—Location of Hand Controls, Indicators and Tell-Tales in Motor Vehicles (Standard No. Standard ISO 4040: 2009).
25. Conventional vehicle display panels: The drivers’ operative images and directions for their redesign10.1016/j.apergo.2011.12.004 ↗
26. United Nations (2018). UN Regulation No. 39—Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Vehicles with Regard to the Speedometer and Odometer Equipment Including Its Installation, Revision 2, United Nations.
27. Kern, D., and Schmidt, A. (2009, January 21–22). Design Space for Driver-based Automotive User Interfaces. Proceedings of the Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI 2009), Essen, Germany.10.1145/1620509.1620511 ↗
28. Usability testing of three visual HMIs for assisted driving: How design impacts driver distraction and mental models10.1080/00140139.2022.2136766 ↗
29. Context adaptable driver information—Or, what do whom need and want when?10.1016/j.apergo.2013.12.004 ↗
30. (2020). Road Vehicles—Measurement of Driver Visual Behaviour with Respect to Transport Information and Control Systems (Standard No. Standard ISO 15007: 2020).
31. (2024, August 26). Human Factors: From Science to Application. Available online: https://www.visualexpert.com/.