Internal Observation Method of Temporary Structures Covered with a Construction Safety Net Using Image Processing and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs)
Source abstract
Abstract
This study proposes a method for observing the inside of a temporary structure covered with a construction safety net using an image processing technique and 3D modeling. Images of the temporary structures were obtained using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Observing the inside of temporary structures is limited to using UAVs due to construction safety nets that act as obstacles. To solve this problem, the histogram equalization and grayscale stretching techniques were used to visualize the inside of a temporary structure covered by safety nets. After verifying the proposed method with small scale specimens, the proposed method was applied to climbing formwork installed at a construction site. Three-dimensional modeling technique was combined with improved images that were processed using the proposed method. The results indicated that the proposed method could identify internal objects that were not visible owing to safety nets. By comparing the original and improved images obtained through applying the proposed method, four target objects located inside the climbing formwork that were not visible owing to safety nets were sufficiently identified in the improved images. Thus, the proposed method can be effectively applied to identify the internal objects of temporary structures covered with safety nets.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage · BIM and Construction Integration · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Safety Engineering, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea
Department of Big Data, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea
Department of Disaster Prevention Engineering, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea
Funding
Ministry of Education and National Research Foundation of Korea · Korea government
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Wireless sensor technologies for monitoring civil structures
2. UAV-aided bridge inspection protocol through machine learning with improved visibility images10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116791 ↗
3. Expert system for color image retrieval10.1016/j.eswa.2004.10.018 ↗
4. Butkiewicz, T., Chang, R., Wartell, Z., and Ribarsky, W. (2008, January 15). Visual Analysis for Live LIDAR Battlefield Change Detection. Proceedings of the Defense and Security 2008: Special Sessions on Food Safety, Visual Analytics, Resource Restricted Embedded and Sensor Networks, and 3D Imaging and Display, Orlando, FL, USA.10.1117/12.777158 ↗
5. Comert, R., and Kaplan, O. (2018, January 7–10). Object Based Building Extraction and Building Period Estimation from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Data. Proceedings of the ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Beijing, China.10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-3-71-2018 ↗
6. Achievements and challenges in machine vision-based inspection of large concrete structures10.1260/1369-4332.17.3.303 ↗
7. Automatic crack detection and measurement based on image analysis10.1109/TIM.2015.2509278 ↗
8. A review of rotorcraft unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) developments and applications in civil engineering10.12989/sss.2014.13.6.1065 ↗
9. UAV integration in current construction safety planning and monitoring processes: Case study of a high-rise building construction project in Chile10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000761 ↗
10. Rudol, P., and Doherty, P. (2008, January 1–8). Human Body Detection and Geolocalization for UAV Search and Rescue Missions Using Color and Thermal Imagery. Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT, USA.10.1109/AERO.2008.4526559 ↗
11. Pepe, M., Alfio, V.S., and Costantino, D. (2022). UAV platforms and the SfM-MVS approach in the 3D surveys and modelling: A review in the cultural heritage field. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app122412886 ↗
12. Themistocleous, K. (2020). The Use of UAVs for Cultural Heritage and Archaeology. Remote Sensing for Archaeology and Cultural Landscapes, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-10979-0_14 ↗
13. Kantaros, A., Ganetsos, T., and Petrescu, F.I.T. (2023). Three-dimensional printing and 3D scanning: Emerging technologies exhibiting high potential in the field of cultural heritage. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13084777 ↗
14. Facility inspection using UAVs: A case study in the University of Georgia campus10.1080/01431161.2018.1515510 ↗
15. Safety challenges of UAV integration in construction: Conceptual analysis and future research roadmap10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105473 ↗
16. Concrete column recognition in images and videos10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000053 ↗
17. Using colors to detect structural components in digital pictures10.1111/1467-8667.00253 ↗
18. A dynamic histogram equalization for image contrast enhancement10.1109/TCE.2007.381734 ↗
19. Ahmed, M., Seraj, R., and Islam, S.M.S. (2020). The k-means algorithm: A comprehensive survey and performance evaluation. Electron., 9.10.3390/electronics9081295 ↗
20. State-of-the-art and applications of 3D imaging sensors in industry. cultural heritage, medicine, and criminal investigation10.3390/s90100568 ↗
21. Alvarez, L., Baumela, L., Henriquez, P., and Marquez-Neila, P. (2010, January 13–18). Morphological Snakes. Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, San Franciso, CA, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2010.5539900 ↗
22. Remondino, F., Spera, M.G., Nocerino, E., Menna, F., Nex, F., and Gonizzi-Barsanti, S. (2013, January 28). Dense image matching: Comparisons and analyses. Proceedings of the Digital Heritage International Congress, Marseille, France.10.1109/DigitalHeritage.2013.6743712 ↗
23. Modeling the world from internet photo collections10.1007/s11263-007-0107-3 ↗
24. Malihi, S., Valadan Zoej, M.J., Hahn, M., Mokhtarzade, M., and Arefi, H. (2016, January 12–19). 3D Building Reconstruction Using Dense Photogrammetric Point Cloud. Proceedings of the International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B3-71-2016 ↗
25. Comparison between collective protective systems in Brazil: Safety platforms and safety net type V10.1007/s42452-020-03838-0 ↗
26. Safety net applications in developing countries: Turkey and Iran case study
27. Wang, C., Tang, Y., Kassem, M.A., and Chen, Z. (2022). UAV application for typhoon damage assessment in construction sites. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12136293 ↗
28. Kim, H.-J., Kim, J.-Y., Aim, J.-W., Kim, S.-K., and Na, W.S. (2024). Unmanned aerial vehicle-based automated path generation of rollers for smart construction. Electronics, 13.10.3390/electronics13010138 ↗
29. Halder, S., and Afsari, K. (2023). Robots in inspection and monitoring of buildings and infrastructure: A systematic review. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13042304 ↗
30. Jiao, X., Wu, N., Zhang, X., Fan, J., Cai, Z., Wang, Y., and Zhou, Z. (2024). Enhancing tower crane safety: A UAV-based intelligent inspection approach. Buildings, 14.10.3390/buildings14051420 ↗
31. Liang, H., and Seo, S. (2023). UAV low-altitude remote sensing inspection system using a small target detection network for helmet wear detection. Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15061560 ↗
32. Kumar, S., Poyyamozhi, M., Murugesan, B., Rajamanickam, N., Alroobaea, R., and Nureldeen, W. (2024). Investigation of unsafe construction site conditions using deep learning algorithms using unmanned aerial vehicles. Sensors, 24.10.3390/s24206737 ↗
33. Akinradewo, O., Aigbavboa, C., Emere, C., Ebiloma, D.O., Akinshipe, O., and Oke, A. (2024). Barriers to the adoption of unmanned aerial vehicles for construction projects in South Africa. Eng. Proc., 76.10.3390/engproc2024076012 ↗
34. Gonzales, R.C., and Woods, R.E. (2018). Digital Image Processing, Pearson. [4th ed.].
35. Image registration in medical applications
36. Hore, A., and Ziou, D. (2010, January 23–26). Image Quality Metrics: PSNR vs SSIM. Proceedings of the 2010 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Istanbul, Türkiye.10.1109/ICPR.2010.579 ↗