Experimental Study of Compression Behavior on Monolayer FFF Samples
Source abstract
Abstract
Additive manufacturing (AM) processes, such as Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF), enable the production of lightweight parts with high stiffness-to-weight ratios, making them highly suitable for a wide range of engineering applications. However, ensuring the mechanical reliability of these components, particularly for load-bearing purposes, requires systematic mechanical testing of well-designed specimens to asses their suitability. While the tensile properties of additively manufactured materials have been extensively studied, the compressive behavior of components produced via AM, particularly those made from thermoplastic materials, remains comparatively underexplored and insufficiently characterized in the existing body of research. Among these materials, polylactic acid (PLA)—a biodegradable thermoplastic derived from renewable resources—has gained prominence in AM applications. Recent studies have investigated the compression properties of PLA in reinforced materials; however, the focus has primarily been on solid, semi-solid, or porous specimens. These investigations largely overlook thin-walled structures, which are integral to weight-saving designs and commonly feature in topology-optimized structures. Understanding the mechanical behavior of monolayers, the fundamental building blocks of most AM components, is essential for accurately predicting the overall performance of multilayer structures. Monolayers represent the smallest, most basic structural elements of AM parts, and their properties directly influence the behavior of the final, more complex assemblies. Establishing a methodology that correlates monolayer properties with those of multilayer components could significantly streamline testing procedures. By performing mechanical tests on monolayers, instead of on more intricate multilayer specimens, manufacturers could reduce testing complexity and cost while accelerating the development process. The current literature reveals a gap in the design and analysis of thin-walled AM specimens, especially monolayers, under compressive loads. Specifically, the design of monolayer or thin-walled AM compression specimens without infill has not been thoroughly explored. This article addresses this gap by investigating the design and testing of AM monolayer compression specimens produced using FFF of PLA. Three distinct specimen geometries are considered—circular, helicoidal, and S-shaped—to evaluate their potential for understanding and predicting the compressive behavior of AM monolayer structures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Industrial Design, School of Engineering, University of Cadiz, Av. Universidad de Cadiz 10, E11510 Puerto Real, Spain
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Gebhardt, A. (2011). Understanding Additive Manufacturing, Hanser Publishers.10.3139/9783446431621.fm ↗
2. Mechanical characterization of parts fabricated using fused deposition modeling10.1108/13552540310489631 ↗
3. Orthotropic mechanical properties of fused deposition modelling parts described by classical laminate theory10.1016/j.matdes.2015.11.009 ↗
4. Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS10.1108/13552540210441166 ↗
5. Selvamani, S.K., Ngui, W.K., Rajan, K., Samykano, M., Kumar, R., and Badadhe, A.M. (2022). Investigation of bending and compression properties on PLA-brass composite using FDM. Phys. Chem. Earth, 128.10.1016/j.pce.2022.103251 ↗
6. Compression and flexural study on PLA-Cu composite filament using FDM10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.858 ↗
7. Bhatia, S.K., and Ramadurai, K.W. (2017). 3D Printing and Bio-Based Materials in Global Health: An Interventional Approach to the Global Burden of Surgical Disease in Low- and Middle-Income Countries, Springer.
8. Measurement of anisotropic compressive strength of rapid prototyping parts10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.095 ↗
9. Ben Ali, N., Khlif, M., Hammami, D., and Bradai, C. (2019). Mechanical and morphological characterization of spherical cell porous structures manufactured using FDM process. Eng. Fract. Mech., 216.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106527 ↗
10. Brischetto, S., Ferro, C., Maggiore, P., and Torre, R. (2017). Compression Tests of ABS Specimens for UAV Components Produced via the FDM Technique. Technologies, 5.10.3390/technologies5020020 ↗
11. Experimental testing and numerical analysis of FDM multi-cell inserts and hybrid structures10.1016/j.tws.2018.04.009 ↗
12. Rocha Pereira, T., Patterson, A., and Messimer, S. (2020). Buckling Strength of 3-D Printed Thermoplastic Thin Shells: Notes on an Exploratory Study of As-Printed and Reinforced Cases. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10175863 ↗
13. Application of PSI Methods to Select FDM Process Parameter for Polylactic Acid
14. Analysis of the influence of printing parameters on the compression resistance of PLA in the FDM process10.1108/RPJ-04-2024-0165 ↗
15. Characterization of the mesostructure of fused-deposition acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene materials10.1108/13552540010337056 ↗
16. Parametric appraisal of mechanical property of fused deposition modelling processed parts10.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.016 ↗
17. Preliminary Orthotropic Elastic Model for the Study of Natural Frequencies and Mode Shapes of a 3D Printed Onyx Thin Circular Cylindrical Shell
18. Isotropic and anisotropic elasticity and yielding of 3D printed material10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.06.009 ↗
19. Additive manufacturing of PLA structures using fused deposition modelling: Effect of process parameters on mechanical properties and their optimal selection10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.065 ↗
20. Yamamura, T., Omiya, M., Sakai, T., and Viot, P. (2009, January 24–26). Evaluation of compressive properties of PLA/PBAT polymer blends. Proceedings of the Materials and Mechanics Conference, Yokohama, Japan.10.1299/jsmemm.2009.485 ↗
21. (2012). Plastics—Determination of Tensile Properties Part 1: General Principles (Standard No. DIN EN ISO 527-1).
22. (2002). Plastics—Determination of Compressive Properties (Standard No. ISO 604).
23. Wendt, C., Fernández-Vidal, S.R., Gómez-Parra, A., Batista, M., and Marcos, M. (2016). Processing and Quality Evaluation of Additive Manufacturing Monolayer Specimens. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2016.10.1155/2016/5780693 ↗