journal article·2025-01-24Open access

Does Higher Maturation Make Age-Grouped Swimmers Faster? A Study on Pubertal Female Swimmers

Kamil Sokołowski, Piotr Krężałek, Łukasz Wądrzyk, Magdalena Żegleń, Marek Strzała

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 3

Abstract

Background: The main aim of this study was to identify the differences between subgroups of swimmers based on physiological (peak oxygen uptake—VO2peak), strength (average tethered swimming force—60Fave), stroke kinematics (v100—swimming speed at 100 m front crawl, stroke rate—SR, stroke length—SL), and anthropometrical (i.e.,: biological age—BA, body height—BH, body mass—BM) factors within swimmers at different levels of maturity (BA). Methods: This study involved 39 female swimmers (age: 12.88 ± 0.54 years, BA: 13.98 ± 1.91 years). Cluster analysis (k-cluster) and stepwise multiple regression was performed. Results: Significant correlations were observed between v100 and BA, 60Fave, AS, VO2peak. Stepwise multiple regression indicated 60Fave and VO2peak as the main explanatory variables of v100 (R2 = 0.60, p < 0.0001). Cluster analysis allowed us to distinguish three groups of swimmers, differing in BA (cluster 1: 14.07 ± 0.96 years, cluster 2: 17.05 ± 1.53, cluster 3: 11.94 ± 0.95) and v100, as well as in BH, FFM, AS. Conclusions: There were differences between cluster groups, with early mature swimmers characterized by the highest BH, FFM, AS, 60Fave, and VO2peak. Probably, biologically younger late mature swimmers (cluster 3) are slower than the other 2 groups (cluster 1 and 2) because of being less somatically developed. Based on these study results, coaches should ensure further development of aerobic and anaerobic conditioning among normal mature swimmers with simultaneous focus on improving technique skills among early mature ones.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Sports Performance and Training · Sports injuries and prevention · Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Water Sports, Institute of Sports Sciences, University of Physical Culture in Krakow, 31-571 Krakow, Poland

Department of Physiology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, University of Physical Culture in Krakow, 31-571 Krakow, Poland

Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, University School of Physical Culture in Krakow, 31-571 Krakow, Poland

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education (Poland)

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. Linking selected kinematic, anthropometric and hydrodynamic variables to young swimmer performance10.1123/pes.24.4.649 ↗
2. Analysis of swimming performance from physical, physiological, and biomechanical parameters in young swimmers10.1123/pes.19.1.70 ↗
3. Multivariate analysis of 200-m front crawl swimming performance in young male swimmers
4. Physical Development and Swimming Performance During Biological Maturation in Young Female Swimmers
5. Barbosa, T.M., Bartolomeu, R., Morais, J.E., and Costa, M.J. (2019). Skillful swimming in age-groups is determined by anthropometrics, biomechanics and energetics. Front. Physiol., 10.10.3389/fphys.2019.00073 ↗
6. Effect of age, sex, and race distance on front crawl stroke parameters in subelite adolescent swimmers during competition10.1123/pes.2014-0114 ↗
7. The Association between Anthropometric Variables, Functional Movement Screen Scores and 100 m Freestyle Swimming Performance in Youth Swimmers10.3390/sports3010001 ↗
8. Somatic and physical traits affecting sprint swimming performance in young swimmers10.1055/s-2004-817862 ↗
9. Growth and development of Male gymnasts, swimmers, soccer and tennis players: A longitudinal study10.1080/03014469500004072 ↗
10. Aerobic cost in elite female adolescent swimmers10.1055/s-0028-1104583 ↗
11. Sokołowski, K., Strzała, M., Stanula, A., Kryst, Ł., Radecki-Pawlik, A., Krężałek, P., Rosemann, T., and Knechtle, B. (2021). Biological Age in Relation to Somatic, Physiological, and Swimming Kinematic Indices as Predictors of 100 m Front Crawl Performance in Young Female Swimmers. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18.10.3390/ijerph18116062 ↗
12. Physiological, biomechanical and anthropometrical predictors of sprint swimming performance in adolescent swimmers
13. Muscle Metabolism and Enzyme Activities after Training in Boys 11–13 Years Old10.1111/j.1748-1716.1973.tb05415.x ↗
14. Physical Endurance, Somatic Indices and Swimming Technique Parameters as Determinants of Front Crawl Swimming Speed at Short Distances in Young Swimmers10.2478/v10036-009-0016-3 ↗
15. Growth influences biomechanical profile of talented swimmers during the summer break10.1080/14763141.2013.865139 ↗
16. The interplay between propelling efficiency, hydrodynamic position and energy cost of front crawl in 8 to 19-year-old swimmers10.1007/s00421-008-0822-7 ↗
17. Evaluation of adolescent swimmers through a 30-s tethered test10.1123/pes.24.2.312 ↗
18. Aerobic and anaerobic performances in tethered swimming10.1055/s-0031-1291250 ↗
19. Developmental changes and predictability of static strength in individuals of different maturity: A 30-year longitudinal study10.1080/02640410902874711 ↗
20. Modeling the links between young swimmers’ performance: Energetic and biomechanic profiles10.1123/pes.22.3.379 ↗
21. A new model of performance classification to standardize the research results in swimming
22. Validity and reliability of bioelectrical impedance analysis and skinfold thickness in predicting body fat in military personnel10.7205/MILMED-D-12-00545 ↗
23. Reliability and validity of bioelectrical impedance in determining body composition10.1152/jappl.1988.64.2.529 ↗
24. Sokołowski, K., Bartolomeu, R.F., Barbosa, T.M., and Strzała, M. (2022). VO2 kinetics and tethered strength influence the 200-m front crawl stroke kinematics and speed in young male swimmers. Front. Physiol., 13.10.3389/fphys.2022.1045178 ↗
25. An Effect Size Primer: A Guide for Clinicians and Researchers10.1037/a0015808 ↗
26. Olbrecht, J. (2000). The Science of Winning: Planning, Periodizing and Optimizing Swim Training, Swimtraxx Publishing.
27. Troup, J.P., Hollander, A.P., Bone, M., Trappe, S., and Barzdukas, A.P. (1992). Performance-related differences in the anaerobic contribution of competitive freestyle swimmers. Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming V1, Taylor & Francis.
28. The development of aerobic power in young athletes10.1152/jappl.1993.75.3.1160 ↗
29. Strzała, M., Sokołowski, K., Wądrzyk, Ł., Staszkiewicz, R., Kryst, Ł., Żegleń, M., Krężałek, P., and Maciejczyk, M. (2023). Oxygen uptake kinetics and biological age in relation to pulling force and 400-m front crawl performance in young swimmers. Front. Physiol., 14.10.3389/fphys.2023.1229007 ↗
30. Adults have lower stroke rate during submaximal front crawl swimming than children10.1007/s00421-003-1022-0 ↗
31. Effect of Age, Anthropometry, and Distance in Stroke Parameters of Young Swimmers10.1123/ijspp.2013-0278 ↗
32. Santos, C.C., Garrido, N.D., Cuenca-Fernández, F., Marinho, D.A., and Costa, M.J. (2023). Performance Tiers within a Competitive Age Group of Young Swimmers Are Characterized by Different Kinetic and Kinematic Behaviors. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23115113 ↗
33. Alves, M., Carvalho, D.D., Fernandes, R.J., and Vilas-Boas, J.P. (2022). How Anthropometrics of Young and Adolescent Swimmers Influence Stroking Parameters and Performance? A Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.10.3390/ijerph19052543 ↗
34. Data Modeling for Inter- and Intra-Individual Stability of Young Swimmers’ Performance: A Longitudinal Cluster Analysis10.1080/02701367.2019.1708235 ↗
35. Front Crawl Sprint Performance: A Cluster Analysis of Biomechanics, Energetics, Coordinative, and Anthropometric Determinants in Young Swimmers10.1123/mc.2014-0050 ↗
36. Dormehl, S.J., Robertson, S.J., and Williams, C.A. (2016). How Confident Can We Be in Modelling Female Swimming Performance in Adolescence?. Sports, 4.10.3390/sports4010016 ↗