journal article·2025-01-24Open access

Indoor Walking Trajectory Estimation Using Mobile Device Sensors for Hand-Held and Hand-Swinging Modes

Yuta Izutsu, Nobuyoshi Komuro

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 3

Abstract

We propose an indoor location estimation method using sensors of mobile devices. First, we perform attitude estimation using each sensor. This estimation is used to estimate the attitude of the mobile device with respect to the earth. Based on the acceleration and other information obtained from the attitude estimation, we then estimate the step detection, step length, and direction of the step. Finally, the location is calculated using all the estimation results. To eliminate the need to hold the mobile device in place during the estimation process, the method is configured so that estimates may be performed while walking, while looking at the screen, and while walking and holding the device in one hand. As the proposed method does not use indoor location fingerprinting or machine learning, real-time estimation can be performed. Although the accuracy could be higher, our experimental results show that the proposed method is able to effectively estimate the location and walking trajectory.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems · Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies · Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Chiba University, Chiba 263-8522, Japan

Digital Transformation Enhancement, Chiba University, Chiba 263-8522, Japan

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Levi, R.W., and Judd, T. (1996). Dead Reckoning Navigational System Using Accelerometer to Measure Foot Impacts. (U.S. Patent No. 5,583,776).
2. Murata, Y., Kaji, K., and Kawaguchi, N. (2014, January 11–13). Investigation of Pedestrian Dead Reckoning based on Human Activity Knowledge. Proceedings of the 76th National Convention of IPSJ, Tokyo, Japan.
3. Endo, I., and Fujita, S. (2013, January 10–12). Indoor Tracking Method Using Multiple Sensors in Devices. Proceedings of the Multimedia, Distributed, Cooperative, and Mobile Symposium, Hokkaido, Japan.
4. Dead Reckoning Method by Hand for Pedestrian Navigation System
5. BenAbdelkader, C., Cutler, R., and Davis, L. (2002, January 21–21). Stride and Cadence as as Biometric in Automatic Person Identification and Verification. Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face Gesture Recognition, Washington, DC, USA.
6. Tanawongsuwan, R., and Bobick, A. (2003). Performance Analysis of Time-Distance Gait Parameters under Different Speeds. Audio- and Video-Based Biometric Person Authentication, Springer.10.1007/3-540-44887-X_83 ↗
7. Human Walking: With Reference to Step Length, Cadence, Speed and Energy Expenditure10.1537/ase1911.98.385 ↗
8. Weinberg, H. (2002). Using the ADXL202 in Pedometer and Personal Navigation Applications, Analog Devices, Inc.. Analog Devices An-602 Application Note.
9. Diaz, E.M., and Gonzalez, A.L.M. (2014, January 27–30). Step Detector and Step Length Estimator for an Inertial Pocket Navigation System. Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN), Busan, Republic of Korea.10.1109/IPIN.2014.7275473 ↗
10. An Indoor Position-Estimation Algorithm Using Smartphone IMU Sensor Data10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2891942 ↗
11. Jimenez, A.R., Seco, F., Preito, C., and Guevara, J. (2009, January 26–28). A Comparison of Pedestrian Dead-Reckoning Algorithms using a Low-Cost MEMS IMU. Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing, Budapest, Hungary.10.1109/WISP.2009.5286542 ↗
12. Design of a Wireless Assisted Pedestrian Dead Reckoning System—The NavMote Experience10.1109/TIM.2005.858557 ↗
13. Ogata, K., and Tanaka, H. (2024). Real-Time Self-Positioning with the Zero Moment Point Model and Enhanced Position Accuracy Using Fiducial Markers. Computers, 13.10.3390/computers13120310 ↗
14. SmartPDR: Smartphone-Based Pedestrian Dead Reckoning for Indoor Localization10.1109/JSEN.2014.2382568 ↗
15. Smartphone-Based Indoor Positioning Using BLE iBeacon and Reliable Lightweight Fingerprint Map10.1109/JSEN.2020.2989411 ↗
16. Smartphone-Based Indoor Localization with Integrated Fingerprint Signal10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2974038 ↗
17. Real time indoor localization integrating a model based pedestrian dead reckoning on smartphone and BLE beacons10.1007/s12652-017-0579-0 ↗
18. Mottakin, K., Davuluri, K., Allison, M., and Song, Z. (2024). SWiLoc: Fusing Smartphone Sensors and WiFi CSI for Accurate Indoor Localization. Sensors, 24.10.20944/preprints202408.2254.v1 ↗
19. Indoor localization system using deep learning based scene recognition10.1007/s11042-022-12481-3 ↗
20. Izutsu, Y., and Komuro, N. (2023, January 17–19). Indoor Walking Trajectory Estimation Method using Mobile Device Sensors. Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Consumer Electronics—Taiwan (ICCE-Taiwan), Pingtung, Taiwan.10.1109/ICCE-Taiwan58799.2023.10227050 ↗
21. Research on Attitude Estimation Algorithm under Dynamic Acceleration10.7210/jrsj.26.626 ↗
22. Madgwick, S.O.H. (2010). An Efficient Orientation Filter for Inertial and Inertial/Magnetic Sensor Arrays, x-io Technologies Limited. Report x-io and University of Bristol (UK).
23. Valenti, R.G., Dryanovski, I., and Xiao, J. (2015). Keeping a Good Attitude: A Quaternion-Based Orientation Filter for IMUs and MARGs. Sensors, 15.10.3390/s150819302 ↗