Predictions of Muscle Forces During the Cross-Body Adduction and Hand-Behind-the-Back Tests to Assess Osteoarthritis of the Acromioclavicular Joint
Source abstract
Abstract
Acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis is prevalent in middle-aged and older people, causing shoulder pain and functional limitations. Despite its prevalence, there are inconsistencies in the physical diagnosis procedures practiced in clinical tests. A recent study introduced a novel hand-behind-the-back (HBB) test, a promising alternative to the traditional cross-body adduction (CBA) test. However, further study was suggested to validate the results obtained. So, this study predicted muscle forces for the cross-body adduction and hand-behind-the-back tests using OpenSim and the AnyBody Modeling System™. This work redefined the joint kinematics for the tests and performed an inverse dynamics analysis to solve the muscle redundancy problem using the generic upper extremity dynamic models available in OpenSim and AnyBody Modeling System™. The results revealed some agreements and significant discrepancies in most muscle force predictions between the OpenSim and AnyBody Modeling SystemTM. Thus, this study underscores the necessity of integrating multiple modeling approaches and comprehensive validation, including experimental data, to enhance the accuracy and reliability of muscle force predictions in shoulder biomechanics during CBA and HBB tests.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries · Shoulder Injury and Treatment · Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43606, USA
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43606, USA
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis10.1016/j.joca.2021.04.020 ↗
2. Osteoarthritis—An untreatable disease?10.1038/nrd1693 ↗
3. Osteoarthritis: An update with relevance for clinical practice10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60243-2 ↗
4. Sánchez Romero, E.A., Meléndez Oliva, E., Alonso Pérez, J.L., Martín Pérez, S., Turroni, S., Marchese, L., and Villafañe, J.H. (2021). Relationship between the Gut Microbiome and Osteoarthritis Pain: Review of the Literature. Nutrients, 13.10.3390/nu13030716 ↗
5. Acromioclavicular osteoarthritis: A common cause of shoulder pain10.1097/SMJ.0000000000000101 ↗
6. Degenerative joint disease of the acromioclavicular joint: A review10.1177/0363546513485359 ↗
7. Degenerative deformations of the acromioclavicular joint in the elderly10.1016/0167-4943(84)90027-X ↗
8. Degeneration of the Acromioclavicular Joint: A Morphological Study10.3109/17453678308996597 ↗
9. Matsen, F.A., Cordasco, F.A., Sperling, J.W., Lippitt, S.B., Rockwood, C.A., Antuña, S., Bois, A.J., Hsu, J.E., and Parsons, B.O. (2021). Rockwood and Matsen’s the Shoulder, Elsevier.
10. Sonography and MRI of the shoulder: Comparison of patient satisfaction10.2214/ajr.183.5.1831449 ↗
11. Diagnostic values of tests for acromioclavicular joint pain10.2106/00004623-200404000-00021 ↗
12. Introduction of a new physical examination procedure for the differentiation of acromioclavicular joint lesions and subacromial impingement10.1016/S0161-4754(99)70064-3 ↗
13. Therapeutic efficacy of corticosteroid injections in the acromioclavicular joint
14. On the frozen shoulder
15. The active compression test: A new and effective test for diagnosing labral tears and acromioclavicular joint abnormality10.1177/03635465980260050201 ↗
16. Osteoarthritis of the acromioclavicular joint: A review of anatomy, biomechanics, diagnosis, and treatment10.1097/01.PHM.0000140804.46346.93 ↗
17. On the kinematics of the cross body abduction and hand behind the back tests to assess osteoarthritis of the acromioclavicular joint10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20230457 ↗
18. A model of the upper extremity for simulating musculoskeletal surgery and analyzing neuromuscular control10.1007/s10439-005-3320-7 ↗
19. Seth, A., Dong, M., Matias, R., and Delp, S. (2019). Muscle Contributions to Upper-Extremity Movement and Work From a Musculoskeletal Model of the Human Shoulder. Front. Neurorobot., 13.10.3389/fnbot.2019.00090 ↗
20. Implicit methods for efficient musculoskeletal simulation and optimal control10.1016/j.piutam.2011.04.027 ↗
21. Benchmarking of dynamic simulation predictions in two software platforms using an upper limb musculoskeletal model10.1080/10255842.2014.916698 ↗
22. McFarland, D.C., McCain, E.M., Poppo, M.N., and Saul, K.R. (2019). Spatial Dependency of Glenohumeral Joint Stability During Dynamic Unimanual and Bimanual Pushing and Pulling. J. Biomech. Eng., 141.10.1115/1.4043035 ↗
23. Analysis of musculoskeletal systems in the AnyBody Modeling System10.1016/j.simpat.2006.09.001 ↗
24. OpenSim: Open-source software to create and analyze dynamic simulations of movement10.1109/TBME.2007.901024 ↗
25. Seth, A., Hicks, J.L., Uchida, T.K., Habib, A., Dembia, C.L., Dunne, J.J., Ong, C.F., DeMers, M.S., Rajagopal, A., and Millard, M. (2018). OpenSim: Simulating musculoskeletal dynamics and neuromuscular control to study human and animal movement. PLoS Comput. Biol., 14.10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006223 ↗
26. The deltoid, a forgotten muscle of the shoulder10.1007/s00256-013-1667-7 ↗
27. Moment arms of the muscles crossing the anatomical shoulder10.1111/j.1469-7580.2008.00965.x ↗
28. Deltotrapezial Stabilization of Acromioclavicular Joint Rotational Stability: A Biomechanical Evaluation10.1177/23259671221119542 ↗
29. Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries: Diagnosis and Management10.5435/00124635-200904000-00002 ↗
30. The Stabilizing Function of Superficial Shoulder Muscles Changes Between Single-Plane Elevation and Reaching Tasks10.1109/TBME.2018.2850522 ↗
31. Improving Musculoskeletal Model Scaling Using an Anatomical Atlas: The Importance of Gender and Anthropometric Similarity to Quantify Joint Reaction Forces10.1109/TBME.2019.2905956 ↗
32. Muscle force estimation in clinical gait analysis using AnyBody and OpenSim10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.01.045 ↗
33. Skeletal Muscle Wasting and Its Relationship With Osteoarthritis: A Mini-Review of Mechanisms and Current Interventions10.1007/s11926-019-0839-4 ↗
34. D’Avella, A., and Lacquaniti, F. (2013). Control of reaching movements by muscle synergy combinations. Front. Comput. Neurosci., 7.10.3389/fncom.2013.00042 ↗
35. The variation in isometric tension with sarcomere length in vertebrate muscle fibres10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007909 ↗
36. Alkhamis, B.A., Reddy, R.S., Alahmari, K.A., Alshahrani, M.S., Koura, G.M., Ali, O.I., Mukherjee, D., and Elrefaey, B.H. (2024). Balancing act: Unraveling the link between muscle strength, proprioception, and stability in unilateral hip osteoarthritis. PLoS ONE, 19.10.1371/journal.pone.0298625 ↗