Near-Field Aeroacoustics of Spanwise Forcing on a Transonic Wing: A DNS Study
Source abstract
Abstract
The transonic airflow around a supercritical wing with a shock wave is described via direct numerical simulations. Flow control for turbulent drag reduction is applied via streamwise traveling waves of spanwise velocity applied on a finite portion of the suction side. The near-field modifications caused by the forcing are studied via the analysis of the wake profile downstream of the trailing edge. Moreover, for the first time, the effects of spanwise forcing on aeroacoustic noise are considered to establish whether active flow control for drag reduction could possibly increase noise. By extracting the acoustic signals on a circumference placed in the near-field around the wing and by studying them in terms of sound intensity and frequency content, it is found that noise intensity is not significantly increased by spanwise forcing and that frequency content is only minimally altered. Furthermore, if the angle of attack is reduced to take into account the increased lift and the reduced drag made possible by the control action, changes in the noise characteristics become negligible.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows · Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics · Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Aerospaziali, Politecnico di Milano, Via La Masa 34, 20156 Milano, Italy
Institute of Fluid Mechanics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Kaiserstraße 10, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
Dipartimento di Meccanica e Aeronautica, Università di Roma “La Sapienza”, Via Eudossiana 18, 00184 Rome, Italy
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Gad-el-Hak, M. (2000). Flow Control—Passive, Active and Reactive Flow Management, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511529535 ↗
2. Experiments on Drag-Reducing Surfaces and Their Optimization with an Adjustable Geometry10.1017/S0022112096004673 ↗
3. Cacciatori, L., Brignoli, C., Mele, B., Gattere, F., Monti, C., and Quadrio, M. (2022). Drag Reduction by Riblets on a Commercial UAV. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12105070 ↗
4. Ricco, P., Skote, M., and Leschziner, M.A. (2021). A Review of Turbulent Skin-Friction Drag Reduction by near-Wall Transverse Forcing. Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 123.10.1016/j.paerosci.2021.100713 ↗
5. Streamwise-Traveling Waves of Spanwise Wall Velocity for Turbulent Drag Reduction10.1017/S0022112009006077 ↗
6. Auteri, F., Baron, A., Belan, M., Campanardi, G., and Quadrio, M. (2010). Experimental Assessment of Drag Reduction by Traveling Waves in a Turbulent Pipe Flow. Phys. Fluids, 22.10.1063/1.3491203 ↗
7. Marusic, I., Chandran, D., Rouhi, A., Fu, M., Wine, D., Holloway, B., Chung, D., and Smits, A. (2021). An Energy-Efficient Pathway to Turbulent Drag Reduction. Nat. Commun., 12.10.1038/s41467-021-26128-8 ↗
8. Experimental Assessment of Square-Wave Spatial Spanwise Forcing of a Turbulent Boundary Layer10.1007/s00348-024-03799-9 ↗
9. Spatial Discretization Effects in Spanwise Forcing for Turbulent Drag Reduction10.1017/jfm.2024.107 ↗
10. Reynolds-Number Dependence of Turbulent Skin-Friction Drag Reduction Induced by Spanwise Forcing10.1017/jfm.2016.485 ↗
11. Turbulent Drag Reduction with Streamwise-Travelling Waves in the Compressible Regime10.1017/jfm.2024.408 ↗
12. Drag Reduction on a Transonic Airfoil10.1017/jfm.2022.369 ↗
13. Berizzi, N., Gatti, D., Soldati, G., Pirozzoli, S., and Quadrio, M. (2024, January 10–13). Direct Numerical Simulations of the Transonic Flow over an Airfoil with Spanwise Forcing for Drag Reduction. Proceedings of the European Drag Reduction and Flow Control Meeting—EDRFCM 2024, Turin, Italy.
14. Numerical Study on Passive Flow and Noise Control for Flow Past Cylinder by Porous Media Coatings10.1063/5.0218446 ↗
15. Alva, E., Yuan, Z., Araújo, T.B., do Amaral, F.R., Hanifi, A., and Cavalieri, A.V.G. (2024). Airfoil Tonal Noise Reduction by Roughness Elements Part I—Experimental Investigation. arXiv.
16. Yuan, Z., Alva, E., de Araújo, T.B., Cavalieri, A.V.G., and Hanifi, A. (2024). Airfoil Tonal Noise Reduction by Roughness Elements. Part II—Direct Simulations. arXiv.10.2514/6.2023-3202 ↗
17. Szőke, M., Fiscaletti, D., and Azarpeyvand, M. (2020). Influence of Boundary Layer Flow Suction on Trailing Edge Noise Generation. J. Sound Vib., 475.10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115276 ↗
18. Aerodynamic Noise Reduction by Plasma Actuators for a Flat Plate with Blunt Trailing Edge10.1016/j.jsv.2018.08.029 ↗
19. Muhammad, C., and Chong, T. (2022). Mitigation of Turbulent Noise Sources by Riblets. J. Sound Vib., 541.10.1016/j.jsv.2022.117302 ↗
20. Scrutiny of Buffet Mechanisms in Transonic Flow10.1108/HFF-08-2016-0300 ↗
21. Numerical Methods for High-Speed Flows10.1146/annurev-fluid-122109-160718 ↗
22. Large-Eddy Simulation of the Shock/Turbulence Interaction10.1006/jcph.1999.6238 ↗
23. Turbulent Boundary Layers at Moderate Reynolds Numbers: Inflow Length and Tripping Effects10.1017/jfm.2012.324 ↗
24. A Fast Algorithm for the Estimation of Statistical Error in DNS (or Experimental) Time Averages10.1016/j.jcp.2017.07.005 ↗
25. Direct Numerical Simulation of a Turbulent Boundary Layer over an Oscillating Wall10.1080/14685248.2010.538397 ↗
26. The Use of Fast Fourier Transform for the Estimation of Power Spectra: A Method Based on Time Averaging over Short, Modified Periodograms10.1109/TAU.1967.1161901 ↗
27. Wavelet Analysis of Near-Field Pressure Fluctuations Generated by a Subsonic Jet10.1017/jfm.2012.64 ↗
28. The Proper Orthogonal Decomposition of Pressure Fluctuations Surrounding a Turbulent Jet10.1017/S0022112097005089 ↗
29. Coherent Structures in Subsonic Jets: A Quasi-Irrotational Source Mechanism?10.1260/147547206775220407 ↗
30. Integral Time-Space Scales in Turbulent Wall Flows10.1063/1.1586273 ↗
31. Boundary-Layer Instability Noise on Aerofoils10.1017/S002211209800367X ↗
32. Comprehensive Mesh Study for a Direct Numerical Simulation of the Transonic Flow at Rec = 500,000 around a NACA 0012 Airfoil10.1016/j.compfluid.2015.08.030 ↗
33. Regimes of Tonal Noise on an Airfoil at Moderate Reynolds Number10.1017/jfm.2015.475 ↗