Biomechanical Impact of Vertebral Augmentation Techniques: Clinical and Radiological Results in the Literature
Source abstract
Abstract
Vertebral augmentation techniques have advanced significantly, offering improved outcomes in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures. This review explores third-generation devices such as the SpineJack®, Vertebral Body Stenting System® (VBS), and OsseoFix®, which offer enhanced vertebral height restoration, stability, and reduced complications. These devices have been shown to outperform traditional methods like vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty, particularly in reducing the risk of cement leakage and ensuring long-term vertebral stability. Biomechanical studies confirm the efficacy of these systems in promoting spinal recovery. Many of these studies have utilized indirect parameters, such as the Beck Index and kyphotic angles (α and γ) measured by the Cobb method, to evaluate improvements in vertebral deformity. Furthermore, preclinical studies indicate that third-generation devices like SpineJack® enhance vertebral height restoration and stability, with performance influenced by bone quality and implant positioning, and have demonstrated superior initial and sustained height maintenance compared to kyphoplasty. While the higher costs of third-generation systems could be justified by reduced revision rates and better patient outcomes, further research is needed to optimize patient selection and assess long-term benefits. Overall, these devices could represent a significant advancement in vertebral fracture treatment, improving clinical outcomes and biomechanical stability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques · Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology · Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Operative Research Unit of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
Research Unit of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo 21, 00128 Rome, Italy
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Preliminary note on the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty
2. Complications of percutaneous vertebroplasty: An analysis of 1100 procedures performed in 616 patients10.1097/MD.0000000000003850 ↗
3. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures: An evidenced-based review of the literature10.1016/j.spinee.2009.01.003 ↗
4. Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty Can Restore Normal Spine Mechanics Following Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture10.4061/2010/729257 ↗
5. Immediate and early postoperative pain relief after kyphoplasty without significant restoration of vertebral body height in acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures10.3171/foc.2005.18.3.6 ↗
6. Mechanisms of initial endplate failure in the human vertebral body10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.08.002 ↗
7. Is vertebral body stenting in combination with CaP cement superior to kyphoplasty?10.1007/s00586-018-5717-7 ↗
8. Third-generation percutaneous vertebral augmentation systems10.21037/jss.2016.02.01 ↗
9. Noriega, D., Krüger, A., Ardura, F., Hansen-Algenstaedt, N., Hassel, F., Barreau, X., and Beyerlein, J. (2015). Clinical Outcome After the Use of a New Craniocaudal Expandable Implant for Vertebral Compression Fracture Treatment: One Year Results from a Prospective Multicentric Study. BioMed Res. Int., 2015.10.1155/2015/927813 ↗
10. New perspective for third generation percutaneous vertebral augmentation procedures: Preliminary results at 12 months10.4103/0974-8237.116537 ↗
11. Height restoration of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures using different intravertebral reduction devices: A cadaveric study10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.094 ↗
12. Cement augmentation in a thoracolumbar fracture model: Reduction and stability after balloon kyphoplasty versus vertebral body stenting10.1097/BRS.0000000000000470 ↗
13. Vertebral body stenting. A method for repositioning and augmenting vertebral compression fractures
14. Single centre prospective study of the efficacy of percutaneous cement augmentation in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures10.3109/02688697.2012.752431 ↗
15. Vertebral body stenting versus kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A randomized trial10.2106/JBJS.L.00024 ↗
16. Ender, S.A., Wetterau, E., Ender, M., Kühn, J.-P., Merk, H.R., and Kayser, R. (2013). Percutaneous Stabilization System Osseofix® for Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures—Clinical and Radiological Results after 12 Months. PLoS ONE, 8.10.1371/journal.pone.0065119 ↗
17. Eschler, A., Ender, S.A., Ulmar, B., Herlyn, P., Mittlmeier, T., and Gradl, G. (2014). Cementless fixation of osteoporotic VCFs using titanium mesh implants (OsseoFix): Preliminary results. BioMed Res. Int., 2014.10.1155/2014/853897 ↗
18. Osseofix® system for percutaneous stabilization of osteoporotic and tumorous vertebral compression fractures—Clinical and radiological results after 12 months
19. The outcome of expandable titanium mesh implants for the treatment of multi-level vertebral compression fractures caused by multiple myeloma10.1051/sicotj/2021026 ↗
20. Biomechanical comparison of kyphoplasty versus a titanium mesh implant with cement for stabilization of vertebral compression fractures10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b7cc5d ↗
21. Fracture care using percutaneously applied titanium mesh cages (OsseoFix®) for unstable osteoporotic thoracolumbar burst fractures is able to reduce cement-associated complications—Results after 12 months10.1186/s13018-015-0322-5 ↗
22. Radiographic measuring methods in vertebral fractures
23. (2024, September 30). Outline for the Study of Scoliosis—ScienceOpen. Available online: https://www.scienceopen.com/book?vid=76a12f1e-c7ef-4cc2-8aec-0904b520cd98.
24. An evaluation of fracture stabilization comparing kyphoplasty and titanium mesh repair techniques for vertebral compression fractures: Is bone cement necessary?10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d260bf ↗
25. Eschler, A., Ender, S.A., Schiml, K., Mittlmeier, T., and Gradl, G. (2015). Bony healing of unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures in the elderly using percutaneously applied titanium mesh cages and a transpedicular fixation system with expandable screws. PLoS ONE, 10.10.1371/journal.pone.0117122 ↗
26. Measurement of implant deployment and related forces in kyphoplasty by percutaneous approach10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.01.001 ↗
27. Height restoration and maintenance after treating unstable osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures by cement augmentation is dependent on the cement volume used10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.06.007 ↗
28. Safety and clinical performance of kyphoplasty and SpineJack® procedures in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A pilot, monocentric, investigator-initiated study10.1007/s00198-016-3494-x ↗
29. New Implant-Based Technologies in the Spine10.1007/s00270-018-1987-z ↗
30. Krüger, A., Schmuck, M., Noriega, D.C., Ruchholtz, S., Baroud, G., and Oberkircher, L. (2015). Percutaneous Dorsal Instrumentation of Vertebral Burst Fractures: Value of Additional Percutaneous Intravertebral Reposition-Cadaver Study. BioMed Res. Int., 2015.10.1155/2015/434873 ↗
31. Minimum cement volume required in vertebral body augmentation—A biomechanical study comparing the permanent SpineJack device and balloon kyphoplasty in traumatic fracture10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.04.015 ↗
32. Diagnosis and treatment of bone disease in multiple myeloma: Spotlight on spinal involvement10.1155/2013/104546 ↗
33. High incidence rate of vertebral fractures during chronic prednisone treatment, in spite of bisphosphonate or alfacalcidol use. Extension of the alendronate or alfacalcidol in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis-trial
34. Denosumab: A potential new treatment option for recurrent Aneurysmal Bone Cyst of the spine10.1051/sicotj/2019007 ↗
35. CIRSE Guidelines on Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation10.1007/s00270-017-1574-8 ↗
36. Osteoporotic thoracolumbar compression fractures: Long-term retrospective comparison between vertebroplasty and conservative treatment10.1007/s00586-018-5605-1 ↗
37. Pusceddu, C., Faiella, E., Derudas, D., Ballicu, N., Melis, L., Zedda, S., and Marsico, S. (2023). Re-expansion of vertebral compression fractures in patients with multiple myeloma with percutaneous vertebroplasty using spinejack implants: A preliminary and retrospective study. Front. Surg., 10.10.3389/fsurg.2023.1121981 ↗
38. Pusceddu, C., Marsico, S., Derudas, D., Ballicu, N., Melis, L., Zedda, S., de Felice, C., Calabrese, A., De Francesco, D., and Venturini, M. (2023). Percutaneous Vertebral Reconstruction (PVR) Technique of Pathological Compression Fractures: An Innovative Combined Treatment of Microwave Ablation, Bilateral Expandable Titanium SpineJack Implants Followed by Vertebroplasty. J. Clin. Med., 12.10.3390/jcm12134178 ↗