A Method of Selecting Automated Driving Service Sections Considering Spatial Influence Factors
Source abstract
Abstract
Currently, the level of automated driving technology is level 3 service in Korea, and the level 4 service has been launched overseas and is reaching the stage of commercialization. For commercialization, it is necessary not only to stabilize automated driving technology but also to prepare for service applications. To apply and expand automated driving services, it is most urgent to secure the safety of automated driving technology, and it is necessary to prepare for efficient procedures and methods suitable for automated driving services. In this study, considering the two aspects of AV manufacturer and service provider, the spatial factors affecting the safety of ADS are estimated using disengagement information in the level 3 service field data in Korea, and the method is proposed to select the automated driving service sections using spatial information analysis. To validate the method, the matching rate is compared and analyzed by applying it to the other testbed, which is currently being prepared for the level 4 car sharing service. According to validation results, it judged that the proposed method could be used to select the automated driving service section efficiently in the planning stage before deploying AVs and providing services.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Diverse Topics in Contemporary Research · Innovation in Digital Healthcare Systems · Technology and Data Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Transport Technology Research, Korea Transport Institute, 370 Sicheong-daero, Sejong-si 30147, Republic of Korea
Funding
Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement (KAIA)
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport Press Release (2022, November 24). “The Automated Driving Service Area Will Be Expanded to 16 Districts Nationwide at 12 CitiesㆍCounties”, Available online: http://www.molit.go.kr/USR/NEWS/m_71/dtl.jsp?lcmspage=1&id=95087488.
2. The Hankyoreh (2023, June 23). U.S. Unmanned Robotaxi Expands ‘24 Hours a Day’ in San Francisco. Available online: https://www.hani.co.kr/arti/science/future/1089789.html.
3. Sérgio, P., António, L., Sara, F., and António, C. (2024). Driving as a Service: Promoting a Sustainable Transition to Automated Driving. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16072809 ↗
4. A Comparative Analysis of Mobility Service Satisfaction by Driving Subjects and Experiences of the Latest Technology: Focused on Automated Driving Service10.12815/kits.2022.21.5.103 ↗
5. (2021). Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles. Standard No. J3016. Available online: https://www.sae.org/standards/content/j3016_202104/.
6. Development and Validation of Safety Performance Evaluation Scenarios of Autonomous Vehicle based on Driving Data
7. Shin, J., Park, K., Lee, H., and Yoo, J. (2019). Automated Vehicle Evaluation System Establishment and Failure Safety Research, Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement.
8. Hong, Y., Moon, Y., Yoon, I., Park, B., Chris, R., and Lim, Y. (2020). A Study on the Preparation of Evaluation Indicators Related to Automated Driving Demonstration Area, Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement.
9. Federal Transit Administration, United States Department of Transportation (FTA, USDOT) (2021, September 06). An Evaluation of the Valley Metro-Waymo Automated Vehicle RideChoice Mobility on Demand Demonstration. 2021. FTA Report No.0198, New Jersey, SE, Washington, D.C., pp. 10–153, Available online: https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/2021-08/FTA-Report-No-0198.pdf.
10. Bertram, T. (2020). Toolbox for test planning and test realization of scenario-based field tests for automated and connected driving. Automatisiertes Fahren 2019, Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.
11. Klöppel-Gersdorf, M., and Otto, T. (2024, January 2–4). Using V2X-Information for Trajectory Prediction at Urban Intersections. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Vehicle Technology and Intelligent Transport Systems, Angers, France.10.5220/0012735600003702 ↗
12. Evaluation of cooperative systems on driver behavior in heavy fog condition based on driving simulator10.1016/j.aap.2019.04.019 ↗
13. Use of real-world connected vehicle data in identifying high-risk locations based on a new surrogate safety measure10.1016/j.aap.2018.07.002 ↗
14. Effects of connected vehicle-based variable speed limit under different foggy conditions based on simulated driving10.1016/j.aap.2019.04.020 ↗
15. A meta-analysis of the impacts of operating in-vehicle information systems on road safety10.1016/j.iatssr.2019.01.003 ↗
16. Jang, J., Ko, J., Park, J., Oh, C., and Kim, S. (2020). Identification of safety benefits by inter-vehicle crash risk analysis using connected vehicle systems data on Korean freeways. Accid. Anal. Prev., 144.10.1016/j.aap.2020.105675 ↗
17. Analysis of the Effectiveness of Traffic Safety Information using ADAS Data, Transportation Technology and Policy
18. Assessing the Safety Benefits of In-Vehicle Warning Information by Vehicle Interaction Analysis in C-ITS Environments10.7470/jkst.2021.39.1.001 ↗
19. A multi-agent driving simulation approach for evaluating the safety benefits of connected vehicles10.1109/TITS.2020.3045675 ↗
20. Zhang, X., Wang, X., Bao, Y., and Zhu, X. (2022). Safety assessment of trucks based on GPS in-vehicle monitoring data. Accid. Anal. Prev., 168.10.1016/j.aap.2022.106619 ↗
21. A Study to Evaluate the Impact of In-Vehicles Warning Information on Driving Behavior Using C-ITS Based PVD10.12815/kits.2022.21.5.28 ↗
22. Spatial Factors’ Analysis of Affecting on Automated Driving Safety using Spatial Information Analysis Based on Level 4 ODD Elements10.12815/kits.2023.22.5.182 ↗
23. Analysis of Cause of Disengagement Based on U.S. California DMV Autonomous Driving Disengagement Report10.7467/KSAE.2018.26.4.464 ↗