journal article·2024-12-19Open access

Machine Learning Method for Prediction of Hearing Improvement After Stapedotomy

Vid Rebol, Janez Rebol

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 24

Abstract

Otosclerosis is a localized disease of the bone derived from the otic capsule. Surgery is considered for patients with conductive hearing loss of at least 15 dB in frequencies 250 to 1000 Hz or higher. In some cases, the decision as to whether surgery (stapedotomy) should be performed is challenging. We developed a machine learning method that predicts a patient’s postoperative hearing quality following stapedotomy, based on their preoperative hearing quality and other features. A separate set of regressors was trained to predict each postoperative hearing intensity on selected feature sets. For feature selection, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) technique was used. Four models were constructed and evaluated: Lasso, Ridge, k-nearest neighbors, and random forest. The most successful predictions were made at air conduction frequencies between 1000 and 3000 Hz, with mean absolute errors of approximately 6 dB. Utilizing the nested CV method, the Lasso predictor achieved the highest overall prediction accuracy. This study presents the first stapedotomy result prediction method for operating surgeons using machine learning. The potential of audiogram estimation in predicting hearing recovery is demonstrated, offering an alternative to existing classification based models.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Phonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques · EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces · Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Klagenfurt, Universitätsstraße 65-67, 9020 Klagenfurt, Austria

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Centre Maribor, Ljubljanska ulica 5, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Prediction of hearing loss among the noise exposed workers in a steel factory using artificial intelligence approach10.1007/s00420-014-1004-z ↗
2. Empirical estimation of the grades of hearing impairment among industrial workers based on new artificial neural networks and classical regression methods10.4103/0019-5278.165337 ↗
3. Machine Learning Models for the Hearing Impairment Prediction in Workers Exposed to Complex Industrial Noise: A Pilot Study
4. Predicting the Hearing Outcome in Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss via Machine Learning Models10.1111/coa.13068 ↗
5. Machine Learning Models for Predicting Hearing Prognosis in Unilateral Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss10.21053/ceo.2019.01858 ↗
6. Predicting hearing recovery following treatment of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss with machine learning models10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102858 ↗
7. Lee, M., Jeon, E.T., Baek, N., Kim, J., Rah, Y., and Choi, J. (2022). Prediction of hearing recovery in unilateral sudden sensorineural hearing loss using artificial intelligence. Sci. Rep., 12.10.1038/s41598-022-07881-2 ↗
8. Application of Machine Learning to Predict Hearing Outcomes of Tympanoplasty10.1002/lary.30457 ↗
9. Chae, M., Yoon, H., Lee, H., and Choi, J. (2024). Hearing Recovery Prediction for Patients with Chronic Otitis Media Who Underwent Canal-Wall-Down Mastoidectomy. J. Clin. Med., 13.10.3390/jcm13061557 ↗
10. Toscano, M., and Shermetaro, C. (2023). Stapedectomy, StatPearls Publishing. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/books/NBK562205/.
11. A Few Useful Things to Know about Machine Learning10.1145/2347736.2347755 ↗
12. James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., and Tibshirani, R. (2014). An Introduction to Statistical Learning: With Applications in R, Springer. Springer Texts in Statistics.10.1007/978-1-4614-7138-7 ↗
13. Developing prediction models for clinical use using logistic regression: An overview10.21037/jtd.2019.01.25 ↗
14. Regression Shrinkage and Selection Via the Lasso10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x ↗
15. Ridge regression: Biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems10.1080/00401706.1970.10488634 ↗
16. k-Nearest Neighbour Classifiers—A Tutorial10.1145/3459665 ↗
17. Efficient Prediction of Cardiovascular Disease Using Machine Learning Algorithms with Relief and LASSO Feature Selection Techniques10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3053759 ↗
18. Random Forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
19. Hyperparameters and tuning strategies for random forest10.1002/widm.1301 ↗
20. Feature selection using lasso
21. Cross-validated permutation feature importance considering correlation between features10.1002/ansa.202200018 ↗
22. Correlation and variable importance in random forests10.1007/s11222-016-9646-1 ↗
23. Long, G., Yu, X., and Wang, S. (2022, January 2–4). Multicollinearity Correction and Combined Feature Effect in Shapley Values. Proceedings of the AI 2021: Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
24. Lundberg, S.M., and Lee, S.I. (2017, January 4–9). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS’17), Red Hook, NY, USA.
25. Wang, F., Yang, Y., Lv, X., Xu, J., and Li, L. (2014, January 27–29). Feature selection using feature ranking, correlation analysis and chaotic binary particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE 5th International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Science, Beijing, China.10.1109/ICSESS.2014.6933569 ↗
26. The revival of the Gini importance?10.1093/bioinformatics/bty373 ↗
27. Toward Generalizable Machine Learning Models in Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences: Estimating Sample Size and Reducing Overfitting10.1044/2023_JSLHR-23-00273 ↗