Investigating the Effect of Human Factors on the Underground Mine Evacuation Process Using Agent-Based Simulation
Source abstract
Abstract
Human factors play a critical role in underground mine evacuations, significantly impacting performance during emergencies. Traditional mine evacuation strategies rely on predetermined routes and static signs, but these methods do not account for the dynamic and unpredictable nature of real emergencies or the diverse behaviors of individuals. This research addresses these limitations by using agent-based simulations to explore evacuation behavior and performance in underground mines. The study involved three key steps. First, agent-based simulations were deployed to model both individual and group behaviors during emergencies. Second, evacuation performance was compared across three scenarios: miners following traditional passive signage, those making decisions in chaotic conditions, and miners equipped with smart evacuation devices. Finally, evacuation times were quantified to assess the effectiveness of each approach. The results revealed that miners using smart devices improved evacuation efficiency by 35% compared with those relying on passive signage and by 37% compared with chaotic decision-making scenarios. The median evacuation time was reduced from 10.8 min with passive signage to 7 min when using smart devices, taking varying stamina levels into account. These findings underscore the importance of integrating intelligent systems that account for pre-evacuation and wayfinding behaviors, offering new insights and setting a higher standard for emergency protocols in underground mining.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics · Human-Automation Interaction and Safety · Safety and Risk Management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mining and Metallurgical Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA
Funding
National Institute for Occupational Health and Safety (NIOSH)
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. Modelling building emergency evacuation plans considering the dynamic behaviour of pedestrians using agent-based simulation10.1016/j.ssci.2018.11.028 ↗
2. Powered haulage safety, challenges, analysis, and solutions in the mining industry; a comprehensive review
3. Simpson, G., Horberry, T., and Joy, J. (2009). Understanding Human Error in Mine Safety, CRC Press.
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2022). Number and Rate of Occupational Mining Fatalities by Year, 1983–2022.
5. Coal mine safety achievements in the USA and the contribution of NIOSH research
6. Parallel simulation of complex evacuation scenarios with adaptive agent models10.1109/TPDS.2014.2311805 ↗
7. Comparing Three Simulation Model Using Taxonomy: System Dynamic Simulation, Discrete Event Simulation and Agent Based Simulation10.17722/ijme.v1i3.17 ↗
8. Macal, C.M., and North, M.J. (2009, January 13–16). Agent-based modeling and simulation. Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, Austin, TX, USA.10.1109/WSC.2009.5429318 ↗
9. Agent-based modeling framework for modeling the effect of information diffusion on community acceptance of mining10.1016/j.techfore.2017.01.019 ↗
10. Zhang, B., Chan, W.K., and Ukkusuri, S.V. (2011, January 11–14). Agent-based discrete-event hybrid space modeling approach for transportation evacuation simulation. Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, Phoenix, AZ, USA.10.1109/WSC.2011.6147751 ↗
11. Filippoupolitis, A., Gelenbe, E., Gianni, D., Hey, L., Loukas, G., and Timotheou, S. (2008, January 16–19). Distributed agent-based Building Evacuation Simulator. Proceedings of the Summer Computer Simulation Conference 2008, SCSC 2008, Part of the 2008 Summer Simulation Multiconference, SummerSim 2008, Edinburgh, Scotland.
12. A dynamic evacuation simulation framework based on geometric algebra10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2016.07.003 ↗
13. Design of formative evacuation plans using agent-based simulation10.1016/j.ssci.2006.08.029 ↗
14. A BIM-based simulation framework for fire safety management and investigation of the critical factors affecting human evacuation performance10.1016/j.aei.2020.101093 ↗
15. An agent-based modeling system for travel demand simulation for hurricane evacuation10.1016/j.trc.2014.02.015 ↗
16. How occupants respond to building emergencies: A systematic review of behavioral characteristics and behavioral theories10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104540 ↗
17. Affiliative behaviour during escape to building exits10.1016/S0272-4944(83)80019-X ↗
18. The nature and conditions of panic10.1086/221536 ↗
19. Psychological disaster myths in the perception and management of mass emergencies10.1111/jasp.12176 ↗
20. Response to disaster: Fact versus fiction & its perpetuation: The sociology of disaster
21. A post-fire survey on the pre-evacuation human behavior10.1007/s10694-007-0040-6 ↗
22. Evacuation from natural disasters: A systematic review of the literature10.1111/risa.12654 ↗
23. Way finding during fire evacuation; an analysis of unannounced fire drills in a hotel at night10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.07.004 ↗
24. How perception of peer behaviour influences escape decision making: The role of individual differences10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.03.013 ↗
25. Joint Optimization for Pedestrian, Information and Energy Flows in Emergency Response Systems With Energy Harvesting and Energy Sharing10.1109/TITS.2022.3159503 ↗
26. Effects of aggressive behaviour and group size on collective escape in an emergency: A test between a social identity model and deindividuation theory10.1348/014466601164993 ↗
27. Pedestrian flows through a narrow doorway: Effect of individual behaviours on the global flow and microscopic dynamics10.1016/j.trb.2017.01.008 ↗
28. Alone or with others: Experiments on evacuation decision making10.1016/j.firesaf.2020.103018 ↗
29. The role of social identity processes in mass emergency behaviour: An integrative review10.1080/10463283.2018.1471948 ↗
30. The behaviour and evacuation experiences of WTC 9/11 evacuees with self-designated mobility impairments10.1016/j.firesaf.2009.04.004 ↗
31. Evacuation models and disaster psychology10.1016/j.proeng.2010.07.004 ↗
32. Do people follow neighbors? An immersive virtual reality experimental study of social influence on individual risky decisions during evacuations10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103644 ↗
33. Fire Evacuation in Underground Transportation Systems: A Review of Accidents and Empirical Research10.1007/s10694-011-0217-x ↗
34. Should We Leave Now? Behavioral Factors in Evacuation Under Wildfire Threat10.1007/s10694-018-0753-8 ↗
35. Conti, R., Chasko, L., Wiehagen, W., and Lazzara, C. (2005). Fire Response Preparedness for Underground Mines.
36. Pomroy, W.H., and Muldoon, T.L. (1985). Improved Stench Fire Warning for Underground Mines.
37. Utilizing Deep Learning for the Automated Extraction of Rock Mass Features from Point Clouds10.1007/s10706-024-02886-2 ↗
38. Effect of text message alerts on miners evacuation decisions10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104875 ↗
39. A Comprehensive Review on Internet of Things (IoT) and its Implications in the Mining Industry10.3844/ajeassp.2020.499.515 ↗
40. Radinovic, G., and Kim, K. (2008, January 25–27). Feasibility Studyof RFID/Wi-Fi/BlueTooth Wireless Tracking System for Underground Mine Mapping—Oklaohoma. Proceedings of the “Incorporating Geospatial Technologies into SMCRA BusinessProcesses”, Atlanta, GA, USA.
41. The Development of a New Smart Evacuation Modeling Technique for Underground Mines Using Mathematical Programming10.3390/mining4010008 ↗
42. Rehman, A.U., Awuah-Offei, K., Baker, D.A., and Bristow, D. (2019, January 24–27). Emergency evacuation guidance system for underground miners. Proceedings of the SME Annual Meeting 2019, Denver, CO, USA.
43. Optimization of escape routes during mine fire using GIS10.1080/25726668.2022.2163550 ↗
44. Asare, F.K., Moniri-Morad, A., Augustine, P.C., and Sattarvand, J. (J. Saf. Sci. Resil., 2024). Vehicle-Augmented Evacuation Integer Programming Model for Improving Safety and Efficiency in Underground Mines, J. Saf. Sci. Resil., in press.10.1016/j.jnlssr.2024.06.007 ↗
45. Determination of the optimal escape routes of underground mine networks in emergency cases10.1016/j.ssci.2009.01.001 ↗
46. Marsh, E., Dahl, J., Kamran Pishhesari, A., Sattarvand, J., and Harris, F.C. (2023, January 24–26). A Virtual Reality Mining Training Simulator for Proximity Detection. Proceedings of the ITNG 2023 20th International Conference on Information Technology-New Generations, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1007/978-3-031-28332-1_44 ↗
47. Kamran-Pishhesari, A., Moniri-Morad, A., and Sattarvand, J. (2024). Applications of 3D Reconstruction in Virtual Reality-Based Teleoperation: A Review in the Mining Industry. Technologies, 12.10.3390/technologies12030040 ↗
48. Head-mounted display-based intuitive virtual reality training system for the mining industry10.1016/j.ijmst.2017.05.005 ↗
49. Mitra, R., Hebblewhite, B., and Saydam, S. (2015, January 25–27). Improving Mine Safety and Mining Education through use of virtual reality. Proceedings of the 36th International Conference of Safety in Mines Research Institutes, Sudbury, ON, Canada.
50. A review of Virtual Reality as a medium for safety related training in Mining
51. Virtual reality training applications for the mining industry
52. Kizil, M. (2003, January 14–16). Virtual reality applications in the Australian minerals industry. Proceedings of the APCOM 2003—31st International Symposium on Application of Computers and Operations Research in the Minerals Industries, Cape Town, South Africa.
53. Kizil, M., Kerridge, A., and Hancock, M. (2004, January 15–16). Use of virtual reality in mining education and training. Proceedings of the CRCMining Conference, Noosa Head, QLD, Australia.
54. Agent-Based Simulation of Building Evacuation after an Earthquake: Coupling Human Behavior with Structural Response10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000199 ↗
55. AnyLogic Help (2024). Library Reference Guides, AnyLogic Help.
56. Validation of an agent-based building evacuation model with a school drill10.1016/j.trc.2018.10.010 ↗