journal article·2024-12-12Open access

A Fuzzy-Control Anti-Cybersickness Intelligent System (FCACIS) Designed for Multiple Inducing Factors in a 3D Virtual Store

Cheng-Li Liu, Shiaw-Tsyr Uang

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 24

Abstract

As online shopping has increased, the business models of online stores have diversified. When consumers cannot experience an actual product, merchants will promote products through a display to attract customers. Virtual reality (VR) provides an immersive platform for consumers to interact with virtual scenarios. Unfortunately, cybersickness remains a problem in VR. The uncomfortable effects of VR hinder its commercial expansion and the broader adoption of 3D virtual stores. Cybersickness has many causes, including personal characteristics, hardware interfaces, and operation behavior. This study develops a fuzzy-control anti-cybersickness intelligent system (FCACIS) with these factors dynamically and actively. The system retrieves the operation value and inferences the cybersickness symptom value (CSSV). When the CSSV exceeds the alarm value, a dialog mode is introduced to remind users to be aware of possible cybersickness. If the CSSV continues to increase, a cybersickness defense mechanism is activated, such as decreasing the field of view and freezing the screen. The experimental results revealed a significant difference in SSQ scores between subjects who navigated a 3D virtual store with and without the FCACIS. The SSQ scores of subjects with the FCACIS (SSQ = 20.570) were significantly lower than those of subjects without the FCACIS (SSQ = 32.880). The FCACIS effectively alleviated cybersickness for subjects over 40 years old. Additionally, the FCACIS effectively slowed the onset of cybersickness in men and women. The anti-cybersickness effect of the FCACIS on flat-panel displays was greater than that on HMDs. The symptoms of cybersickness for a 3DOF controller were also reduced.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts · Interactive and Immersive Displays · User Authentication and Security Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Vanung University, Taoyuan 32061, Taiwan

Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Minghsin University of Science & Technology, Hsinchu 30401, Taiwan

Funding

National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. Profiling subjective symptoms and autonomic changes associated with cybersickness10.1016/j.autneu.2016.12.004 ↗
2. Review on cybersickness in applications and visual displays10.1007/s10055-016-0285-9 ↗
3. Saredakis, D., Szpak, A., Birckhead, B., Keage, H.A.D., Rizzo, A., and Loetscher, T. (2020). Factors associated with virtual reality sickness in head-mounted displays: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Hum. Neurosci., 14.10.3389/fnhum.2020.00096 ↗
4. Oh, H., and Son, W. (2022). Cybersickness and its severity arising from virtual reality content: A comprehensive study. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22041314 ↗
5. Rey, M.C.B., Clark, T.K., Wang, W., Leeder, T., Bian, Y., and Merfeld, D.M. (2016). Vestibular perceptual thresholds increase above the Age of 40. Front. Neurol., 7.10.3389/fneur.2016.00162 ↗
6. Effects of immersive virtual reality headset viewing on young children: Visuomotor function, postural stability, and motion sickness10.1016/j.ajo.2019.07.020 ↗
7. Assessing postural instability and cybersickness through linear and angular displacement10.1177/0018720819881254 ↗
8. Gender differences in mental rotation across adulthood10.1080/03610730903422762 ↗
9. Modern virtual reality technology: Cybersickness, sense of presence, and gender
10. Stanney, K., Fidopiastis, C., and Foster, L. (2020). Virtual reality is sexist: But it does not have to be. Front. Robot. AI, 7.10.3389/frobt.2020.00004 ↗
11. The influence of personality, sound, and content difficulty on virtual reality sickness10.1007/s10055-021-00525-2 ↗
12. Variations in visual sensitivity predict motion sickness in virtual reality10.1016/j.entcom.2021.100423 ↗
13. Quantifying VR cybersickness using EEG10.1007/s10055-021-00517-2 ↗
14. Effects of low stereo acuity on performance, presence and sickness within a virtual environment10.1016/j.apergo.2005.06.009 ↗
15. Presence concept determinants and measurement10.1117/12.387188 ↗
16. Evaluating discrete viewpoint control to reduce cybersickness in virtual reality10.1007/s10055-020-00425-x ↗
17. Grassini, S., and Laumann, K. (2021, January 26–29). Immersive visual technologies and human health. Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics 2021, Siena, Italy.10.1145/3452853.3452856 ↗
18. Evaluating cybersickness of walking on an omnidirectional treadmill in virtual reality10.1109/THMS.2022.3175407 ↗
19. Ramaseri Chandra, A.N., Jamiy, F., and Reza, H. (2022). A systematic survey on cybersickness in virtual environments. Computers, 11.10.3390/computers11040051 ↗
20. Effects of postural stability, active control, exposure duration and repeated exposures on HMD induced cybersickness10.1016/j.displa.2019.08.003 ↗
21. Efect of vr technology matureness on VR sickness10.1007/s11042-018-6969-2 ↗
22. A cybersickness review: Causes, strategies, and classification methods10.5753/jis.2021.2058 ↗
23. Binocular vision in a virtual world: Visual deficits following the wearing of a head-mounted display10.1111/j.1475-1313.1993.tb00496.x ↗
24. Swindells, C., Po, B.A., Hajshirmohammadi, I., Corrie, B., Dill, J.C., Fisher, B.D., and Booth, K.S. (2004, January 19). Comparing CAVE, wall, and desktop displays for navigation and wayfinding in complex 3D models. Proceedings of the Computer Graphics International, Crete, Greece.
25. Control of a virtual vehicle influences postural activity and motion sickness10.1037/a0024097 ↗
26. Visually induced motion sickness in virtual environments10.1162/pres.1992.1.3.306 ↗
27. Psychophysical scaling of circular vection (CV) produced by optokinetic (OKN) motion: Individual differences and effects of practice10.3233/VES-1996-6502 ↗
28. Systematic investigation of physiological correlates of motion sickness induced by viewing an optokinetic rotating drum
29. Effects of navigation speed on motion sickness caused by an immersive virtual environment10.1518/001872001775898223 ↗
30. Kwok, K.K.K., Ng, A.K.T., and Lau, H.Y.K. (2018, January 16–20). Effect of navigation speed and VR devices on cybersickness. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct), Munich, Germany.10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct.2018.00041 ↗
31. Duzmanska, N., Strojny, P., and Strojny, A. (2018). Can simulator sickness be avoided? A review on temporal aspects of simulator sickness. Front. Psychol., 9.10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02132 ↗
32. Scene transitions and teleportation in virtual reality and the implications for spatial awareness and sickness10.1109/TVCG.2018.2884468 ↗
33. Emotions are associated with the genesis of visually induced motion sickness in virtual reality10.1007/s00221-022-06454-z ↗
34. Mehrabian, A., and Russell, J.A. (1974). An Approach to Environmental Psychology, The Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
35. Lang, P.J., Bradley, M.M., and Cuthbert, B.N. (2008). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Affective Ratings of Pictures and Instruction Manual, University of Florida. Technical Report A-8.
36. A neuro-fuzzy warning system for combating cybersickness in the elderly caused by the virtual environment on a TFT-LCD10.1016/j.apergo.2008.12.001 ↗
37. Simulator sickness questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness10.1207/s15327108ijap0303_3 ↗
38. Virtual reality sickness: A review of causes and measurements10.1080/10447318.2020.1778351 ↗
39. The application of biosignal feedback for reducing cybersickness from exposure to a virtual environment10.1162/pres.17.1.1 ↗
40. Psychometric evaluation of simulator sickness questionnaire and its variants as a measure of cybersickness in consumer virtual environments10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102958 ↗
41. Estimating objective (EEG) and subjective (SSQ) cybersickness in people with susceptibility to motion sickness10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103731 ↗