journal article·2024-11-29Open access

Seismic Benefits of a Vibrating Mass Equipped with an Inerter on Frame Structures Due to Soil Interaction

Angelo Di Egidio, Alessandro Contento

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 23

Abstract

The reduction of the seismic effects on new and existing structures is a relevant topic of the structural mechanics applied to the civil engineering. Usually, the conceptual aspects related to a new approach are studied by means of low-dimensional mechanical models able to capture the main dynamic aspects of the method. The present paper can be framed in this context. Specifically, the paper investigates the possibility of reducing the seismic response of a frame structure by using a vibrating mass connected to an inerter device, which interacts through the soil to protect the structure. The problem is studied by using existing soil–structure interaction (SSI) and structure–soil–structure interaction (SSSI) models, which describe the actions between the structure and the soil, and among adjacent structures through linear visco-elastic devices. A seven-degrees-of-freedom mechanical model is used to describe the problem, where a general multi-story frame structure is mathematically described by means of an equivalent 2-degrees-of-freedom system. The external vibrating mass is coupled with the inerter device to increase its inertia without using high real mass. The aim of the paper is to point out the role of the many parameters that characterize the interaction system. Particular attention is devoted to the mechanical characteristics of the soil, in order to know the effectiveness of the SSSI system as a function of the characteristics of the soil. Results show that the vibrating mass equipped with the inerter device is almost always beneficial for the frame structure to be protected. However, sufficient good performances justifying the costs of this method can be reached only in limited ranges of the characterizing parameters.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Seismic Performance and Analysis · Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Edile-Architettura e Ambientale (DICEAA), University of L’Aquila, 67100 Poggio di Roio, Italy

College of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350025, China

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. Base isolation: Linear theory and design10.1193/1.1585566 ↗
2. Den Hartog, J.P. (1956). Mechanical Vibrations, McGraw-Hill. [4th ed.].
3. The effect of tuned-mass dampers on the seismic response of base-isolated structures10.1016/0020-7683(94)00150-U ↗
4. Effect of tuned mass damper on displacement demand of base-isolated structures10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.05.027 ↗
5. Soil-dependent optimum design of a new passive vibration control system combining seismic base isolation with tuned inerter damper10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.11.023 ↗
6. Optimal tuned mass-damper-inerter (TMDI) design for seismically excited MDOF structures with model uncertainties based on reliability criteria10.1002/stc.2082 ↗
7. Optimal design and performance evaluation of systems with Tuned Mass Damper Inerter (TMDI)10.1002/eqe.2861 ↗
8. A generalized 2-DOF model for optimal design of MDOF structures controlled by Tuned Mass Damper Inerter (TMDI)10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105849 ↗
9. Di Egidio, A., and Contento, A. (2023). Seismic Benefits from Coupling Frame Structures with a Hysteretic Mass Damper Inerter. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13085017 ↗
10. Seismic benefits of deformable connections between a frame structure and an external structure with inerter
11. A State-of-the-Art review on Structure-Soil-Structure interaction (SSSI) and Site-City interactions (SCI)10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105002 ↗
12. Vibration control of piled-structures through structure-soil-structure-interaction10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.04.006 ↗
13. Vibration Control of an existing building through the Vibrating Barrier10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.065 ↗
14. An inerter-equipped vibrating barrier for noninvasive motion control of seismically excited structures10.1002/stc.2474 ↗
15. Seismic Protection of Structures with Supplemental Rotational Inertia10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001152 ↗
16. Seismic protection of rocking structures with inerters
17. Cacciola, P., Tombari, A., and Giaralis, A. (2018, January 18–21). A vibrating barrier with grounded inerter for non- invasive seismic protection of existing structures. Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering—16ECEE, Thessaloniki, Greece.
18. Mulliken, J.S. (1994). Discrete Models for Foundation–Soil–Foundation Interaction in Time Domain. [Master’s Thesis, University of South Carolina].
19. Discrete model for foundation–soil–foundation interaction
20. Discrete Model for Dynamic Through-The-Soil Coupling of 3-D Foundations and Structures10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199807)27:7<687::AID-EQE752>3.0.CO;2-O ↗
21. Tuned mass damper and base isolation: A unitary approach for the seismic protection of conventional frame structures10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001581 ↗
22. Archetype dynamically equivalent 3-d.o.f. model to evaluate seismic performances of intermediate discontinuity in frame structures10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0002083 ↗
23. Analytical design models for geotechnical seismic isolation systems10.1007/s10518-022-01469-x ↗
24. Mechanism of geotechnical seismic isolation system: Analytical modeling10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.03.037 ↗
25. (2024, January 15). Available online: https://www.strongmotioncenter.org/.