Analysis on Evaluations of Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute’s Wave Energy Converter’s Field Data Using WEC-Sim and Gazebo: A Simulation Tool Comparison
Source abstract
Abstract
Although many studies have validated wave energy converter (WEC) numerical models against scaled prototype experimental data, there remains a notable lack of validation using data from full-scale deployed WECs. This paper compares two numerical models of Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute’s Wave Energy Converter (MBARI-WEC), a two-body point absorber with an electro-hydraulic power take-off system (PTO). The models are implemented in WEC-Sim/Simscape and Gazebo Simulator. A statistical analysis of the models was performed, and field results were obtained to compare the models’ accuracy in predicting the RMS piston velocity, RMS motor speed, and mean electric power compared to field data for 56 observations across varying sea states. The Gazebo model demonstrated a closer agreement across all three parameters for a majority of the observations. When compared to the field data, the Gazebo and WEC-Sim models exhibited average mean electric power overestimations of 13% and 22%, respectively.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Wave and Wind Energy Systems · Underwater Vehicles and Communication Systems · Earthquake and Tsunami Effects
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87123, USA
Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, Moss Landing, CA 95039, USA
Funding
US Department of Energy’s Water Power Technologies Office
References (12)
Show source-provided references
1. Atcheson, M., and Hüffmeier, J. (2024, November 10). WEC Modelling: Verification and Validation. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349605530_WEC_Modelling_Verification_and_Validation?channel=doi&linkId=6037cfe5299bf1cc26ef8cc0&showFulltext=true.
2. Hamilton, A., Anderson, M., Poubel, L., Dutia, D., Carroll, M., Zhang, M., McEwen, R., and Mayans, J. (2022, December 01). MBARI Wave Energy Conversion Simulation v1.1.0. Available online: https://github.com/osrf/mbari_wec.
3. The MBARI-WEC: A power source for ocean sensing10.1007/s40722-021-00197-9 ↗
4. Wave Energy Converter Power Take-Off Modeling and Validation From Experimental Bench Tests10.1109/JOE.2023.3345903 ↗
5. Ruehl, K., Ogden, D., Yu, Y., Keester, A., Tom, N., Forbush, D., Leon, J., Grasberger, J., and Husain, S. (2022, May 01). WEC-Sim v5.0.1. Available online: https://zenodo.org/records/7121186.10.36688/imej.5.293-303 ↗
6. Robot Operating System 2: Design, architecture, and uses in the wild10.1126/scirobotics.abm6074 ↗
7. Koenig, N., and Howard, A. (October, January 28). Design and use paradigms for Gazebo, an open-source multi-robot simulator. Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566), Sendai, Japan.
8. Newman, J.N. (1978). Marine Hydrodynamics, MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4443.001.0001 ↗
9. Pecher, A., and Kofoed, J. (2017). Handbook of Ocean Wave Energy, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-39889-1 ↗
10. WAMIT (2022, May 01). User Manual v7. Available online: https://www.wamit.com/manual.htm.
11. Tom, N., Ruehl, K., Keester, A., Forbush, D., Ogden, D., Leon, J., Husain, S., Grasberger, J., Topper, M.B.R., and Yu, Y.H. (2023, January 11–16). New Developments and Capabilities Within WEC-Sim. Ocean Renewable Energy. Proceedings of the International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Melbourne, Australia.10.1115/OMAE2023-105030 ↗
12. Hamilton, A. (2022, December 01). FreeSurfaceHydrdynamics v1.3.1. Available online: https://github.com/hamilton8415/FreeSurfaceHydrodynamics.