Extending a Macro-Element Approach for the Modeling of 3D Masonry Structures Under Transient Dynamic Loading
Source abstract
Abstract
Masonry structures, particularly those used in developing countries and in historic buildings, typically consist of unreinforced masonry (URM) walls connected by timber or reinforced concrete elements. This study proposes enhancements to the existing two-dimensional (2D) deformable frame model (DFM) to enhance its ability in simulating masonry walls with a specific focus on accurately predicting the transient dynamic response of three-dimensional (3D) masonry structures while maintaining a minimal number of degrees of freedom (DOF). For the modeling of URM walls, the DFM framework employs elastic beams and diagonal struts with nonlinear constitutive behavior. Structural elements, such as reinforced concrete or timber reinforcements, are represented using conventional beam finite elements. This paper first reviewed the current DFM configuration, which primarily addresses the in-plane (IP) behavior of URM structures. It then introduced modifications tailored for 3D structural analysis. The reliability of the enhanced model was validated through two approaches. First, a modal analysis compared the results from the updated DFM with those from a reference 3D model based on cubic finite elements. Second, a shaking table experiment conducted on a half-scale masonry house was simulated. The findings demonstrate that, despite its limited number of DOF, the updated DFM effectively captures the main natural vibration modes. Furthermore, it shows the model’s ability to predict the nonlinear transient dynamic response of 3D masonry structures with accuracy and limited computational time.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis · Seismic Performance and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, 3SR, 38000 Grenoble, France
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Seismic behavior and damage assessment of two historical fortified masonry palaces with corner towers10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.106003 ↗
2. Earthquake response and damage patterns assessment of two historical masonry churches with bell tower10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107418 ↗
3. (2014). ABAQUS®, Theory Manual, Version 6.14, ABAQUS, Inc.
4. TREMURI program: An equivalent frame model for the nonlinear seismic analysis of masonry buildings10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.08.002 ↗
5. Simplified non-linear seismic analysis of masonry buildings
6. Tomazevic, M., and Weiss, P. (1990, January 20–24). A rational, experimentally based method for the verification of earthquake resistance of masonry buildings. Proceedings of the Fourth US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Palm Springs, CA, USA.
7. Non-linear seismic analysis and vulnerability evaluation of a masonry building by means of the SAP2000 V. 10 code10.1002/eqe.770 ↗
8. Gambarotta, L., and Lagomarsino, S. (1996, January 18–20). Sulla risposta dinamica di pareti in muratura. Proceedings of the Atti del Convegno Nazionale "La Meccanica delle Murature tra Teoria e Progetto", Pitagora editrice, Messina, Italy.
9. Nonlinear macro modeling of slender reinforced concrete shear walls10.1002/suco.201800206 ↗
10. CEN (2005). Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance-Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings, European Committee for Standardization.
11. FEMA (2000). FEMA 356: Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings.
12. Uses and limits of the Equivalent Frame Model on existing unreinforced masonry buildings for assessing their seismic risk: A review10.1016/j.jobe.2017.03.004 ↗
13. Rigid element model for in-plane dynamics of masonry walls considering hysteretic behaviour and damage10.1002/eqe.670 ↗
14. Modelling in-plane micro-structure of masonry walls by rigid elements10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.02.002 ↗
15. Casolo, S., and Pena, F. (2003). Modelling micro-structure aspects of masonry walls by a simplified approach. WIT Trans. Built Environ., 66.
16. Macroscale modelling of microstructure damage evolution by a rigid body and spring model10.2140/jomms.2009.4.551 ↗
17. Caliò, I., Marletta, M., and Pantò, B. (September, January 30). A simplified model for the evaluation of the seismic behaviour of masonry buildings. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering Computing, Rome, Italy.
18. A 3D discrete macro-element for modelling the out-of-plane behaviour of infilled frame structures10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.08.022 ↗
19. Assessment of the dynamic response of unreinforced masonry structures using a macroelement modeling approach10.1002/eqe.3091 ↗
20. Chácara, C., Lourenço, P.B., Pantò, B., Cannizzaro, F., and Caliò, I. (2017, January 3–5). Macro-element mass matrix for the dynamic assessment of unreinforced masonry structures. Proceedings of the Congreso de Métodos Numéricos en Ingeniería, Valencia, Spain.
21. Macro-modelling approach for assessment of out-of-plane behavior of brick masonry infill walls10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.12.019 ↗
22. A new macromodel for the assessment of the seismic response of infilled RC frames10.1002/eqe.3163 ↗
23. Decret, D., Malecot, Y., Sieffiert, Y., Vieux-Champagne, F., and Daudeville, L. (2024). A new macro-element for the prediction of masonry structures behavior. Buildings, 14.10.3390/buildings14030768 ↗
24. Tomazevic, M. (2016). The Computer Program POR, Report ZRMK, Institute for Testing and Research in Materials and Structures.
25. POR2000 (2024, October 24). Structural and Seismic Calculation and Analysis of Masonry Structures. Newsoft., Available online: https://www.newsoft-eng.it/software/por-2000.
26. Turnšek, V., and Čačovič, F. (1970, January 12–15). Some experimental results on the strength of brick masonry walls. Proceedings of the 2nd International Brick Masonry Conference, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
27. Failure of shear-stressed masonry: An enlarged theory, tests and application to shear walls
28. Panagiotakos, T., and Fardis, M. (1996, January 23–28). Seismic response of infilled RC frames structures. Proceedings of the 11th world conference on earthquake engineering, Acapulco, Mexico.
29. Mathworks (2022). Matlab Version: 9.4 (R2022b), The MathWorks Inc.
30. Grange, S. (2016). ATL4S, a Tool and Language for Simplified Structural Solution Strategy, GEOMAS Insa-Lyon. Technical report.
31. Shake table tests on 1:2 reduced scale masonry house with the application of horizontal seismic bands10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.115897 ↗
32. Cast3M version 24.1 (2024, October 24). Finite Element Tool Box for Structural and Fluid Mechanics. Available online: https://www-cast3m.cea.fr.
33. Decret, D. (2021). Numerical Model for the Assessment of the Seismic Vulnerability of Traditional Masonry Structures with Seismic Bands. [Ph.D. Thesis, Université Grenoble Alpes].
34. Clough, R.W., and Penzien, J. (1993). Dynamics of Structures, McGraw-Hill. [2nd ed.].
35. Yadav, S. (2021). Horizontal Seismic Band in Masonry Structure: Seismic Vulnerability Analysis Using Experiments. [Ph.D. Thesis, Université Grenoble Alpes].
36. FCBA (2024, March 10). Seismic Testing of Nepalese Bio-Sourced Buildings. Available online: https://www.fcba.fr/essais-sismiques-constructions-biosourcees-nepalaises/.
37. Strong ground motion attenuation relationships for subduction zone earthquakes10.1785/gssrl.68.1.58 ↗
38. Full-field measurement with a digital image correlation analysis of a shake table test on a timber-framed structure filled with stones and earth10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.06.009 ↗
39. Experimental analysis of a shake table test of timber-framed structures with stone and earth infill10.1193/010516eqs002m ↗
40. SAP2000 (2024, October 24). Integrated Software for Structural Analysis and Design. Computers and Structures Inc., Berkeley, California., Available online: https://www.csiamerica.com/products/sap2000.
41. Seismic fragility and resilience assessment of shallowly buried large-section underground civil defense structure in soft soils: Framework and application10.1016/j.tust.2024.105640 ↗