journal article·2024-11-21Open access

Few Adjustable Parameters Prediction Model Based on Lightweight Prefix-Tuning: Learning Session Dropout Prediction Model Based on Parameter-Efficient Prefix-Tuning

Yuantong Lu, Zhanquan Wang

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 23

Abstract

In response to the challenge of low predictive accuracy in scenarios with limited data, we propose a few adjustable parameters prediction model based on lightweight prefix-tuning (FAP-Prefix). Prefix-tuning is an efficient fine-tuning method that only adjusts prefix vectors while keeping the model’s original parameters frozen. In each transformer layer, the prefix vectors are connected with the internal key-value pair of the transformer structure. By training on the synthesized sequence of the prefix and original input with masked learning, the transformer model learns the features of individual learning behaviors. In addition, it can also discover hidden connections of continuous learning behaviors. During fine-tuning, all parameters of the pre-trained model are frozen, and downstream task learning is accomplished by adjusting the prefix parameters. Continuous trainable prefix vectors can influence subsequent vector representations, leading to the generation of session dropout prediction results. The experiments show that FAP-Prefix significantly outperforms traditional methods in data-limited settings, with AUC improvements of +4.58%, +3.53%, and +8.49% under 30%, 10%, and 1% data conditions, respectively. It also surpasses state-of-the-art models in prediction performance (AUC +5.42%, ACC +5.3%, F1 score +5.68%).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques · Data Stream Mining Techniques · Software System Performance and Reliability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Information Science and Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China

Funding

Smart Education Platform Solution Key Technology Consulting Services, Shanghai Xinyan Information Technology Co., Ltd. · Relying on Enterprises to Implement Professional Integration: Construction and Practice of the Artificial Intelligence Course Dell-Ministry of Education Industry-Academia Collaboration Project

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Lu, T., Shen, X., Liu, H., Chen, B., Chen, L., and Yu, L. (2021, January 17–19). A Framework of AI-based Intelligent Adaptive Tutoring System. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE), Lancaster, UK.10.1109/ICCSE51940.2021.9569273 ↗
2. Prenkaj, B., Stilo, G., and Madeddu, L. (2020, January 19–23). Challenges and solutions to the student dropout prediction problem in online courses. Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management (CKIM), Online.10.1145/3340531.3412172 ↗
3. Deeva, G., De Smedt, J., De Koninck, P., and De Weerdt, J. (2017). Dropout prediction in MOOCs: A comparison between process and sequence mining. Business Process Management Workshops: BPM 2017 International Workshops, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-74030-0_18 ↗
4. Measuring Students’ Engagement with Digital Interactive Textbooks by Analyzing Clickstream Data
5. The longitudinal association between engagement and achievement varies by time, students’ profiles, and achievement state: A full program study10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104787 ↗
6. Wunnasri, W., Musikawan, P., and So-In, C. (2023). A TwoPhase Ensemble-Based Method for Predicting Learners’ Grade in MOOCs. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13031492 ↗
7. Data mining for modeling students’ performance: A tutoring action plan to prevent academic dropout10.1016/j.compeleceng.2017.03.005 ↗
8. Wan, H., Ding, J., Gao, X., and Pritchard, D. (2017, January 25–28). Dropout prediction in MOOCs using learners’ study habits features. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM), Wuhan, China.
9. Béres, F., Kelen, D.M., and Béres, A. (2019, January 11–15). Sequential skip prediction using deep learning and ensembles. Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
10. Wang, W., Yu, H., and Miao, C. (2017, January 6–9). Deep Model for Dropout Prediction in MOOCs. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Crowd Science and Engineering, Beijing, China.10.1145/3126973.3126990 ↗
11. Lee, Y., Shin, D., Loh, H., Lee, J., Chae, P., Cho, J., Park, S., Lee, J., Baek, J., and Kim, B. (2020, January 2–4). Deep attentive study session dropout prediction in mobile learning environment. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, Prague, Czech Republic.10.5220/0009347700260035 ↗
12. Halfaker, A., Keyes, O., Kluver, D., Thebault-Spieker, J., Nguyen, T.T., Shores, K., Uduwage, A., and WarnckeWang, M. (2015, January 18–22). User session identification based on strong regularities in inter-activity time. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web, Florence, Italy.10.1145/2736277.2741117 ↗
13. Choi, Y., Lee, Y., Shin, D., Cho, J., Park, S., Lee, S., Baek, J., Bae, C., Kim, B., and Heo, J. (2020, January 6–10). Ednet: A large-scale hierarchical dataset in education. Proceedings of the Artificial Intelligence in Education: 21st International Conference (AIED), Ifrane, Morocco.10.1007/978-3-030-52240-7_13 ↗
14. Educational data mining: Dropout prediction in XuetangX MOOCs10.1007/s11063-022-10745-5 ↗
15. Devlin, J., Chang, M., Lee, K., and Toutanova, K. (2019). Bert: Pretraining of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv.
16. Lan, Z., Chen, M., Goodman, S., Gimpel, K., Sharma, P., and Soricut, R. (2020, January 30). Albert: A lite bert for self-supervised learning of language representations. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
17. Dong, L., Yang, N., Wang, W., Wei, F., Liu, X., Wang, Y., Gao, J., Zhou, M., and Hon, H.-W. (2019, January 8–14). Unified language model pre-training for natural language understanding and generation. Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
18. Hou, Y., Dong, H., Wang, X., Li, B., and Che, W. (2022). MetaPrompting: Learning to Learn Better Prompts. arXiv.
19. Long Short-Term Memory10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 ↗
20. Cho, K., van Merrienboer, B., Gülçehre, Ç., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., and Bengio, Y. (2014, January 25–29). Learning phrase representations using rnn encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation. Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Doha, Qatar.10.3115/v1/D14-1179 ↗
21. Hatt, T., and Feuerriegel, S. (2020, January 20–24). Early detection of user exits from clickstream data: A markov modulated marked point process model. Proceedings of the Web Conference 2020, Taipei, Taiwan.10.1145/3366423.3380238 ↗
22. MOOC student dropout prediction model based on learning behavior features and parameter optimization10.1080/10494820.2020.1802300 ↗
23. Rzepka, N., Simbeck, K., Müller, H.G., and Pinkwart, N. (2022, January 22–24). Keep It Up: In-session Dropout Prediction to Support Blended Classroom Scenarios. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU 2022), Virtual Event.10.5220/0010969000003182 ↗