Influence of semisolid forging ratio on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti14 alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
The present work is focused on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti14 alloy with different semisolid deformation ratios during forging tests. The results revealed that the forging ratio had a significant effect on the precipitation of the alloy. Fewer plate-shaped Ti2Cu tended to precipitate on grain boundaries with higher forging ratios, and finally the plate-shaped Ti2Cu formed precipitate-free zones along grain boundaries with a forging ratio of 75%. The precipitation on grain boundaries was found to be controlled by a peritectic reaction. Large forging ratios accelerated the extrusion of liquid and resulted in less liquid along the prior grain boundaries, which reduced the peritectic precipitation in this region and formed precipitate-free zones during re-solidification. In addition, increasing the forging ratio could accelerate dynamic recrystallization, which is favorable for improving the semisolid formability. The tensile ductility increased with increasing forging ratio, and a mixed fracture mode, involving both cleavage and dimple fracture, was observed after forging with a forging ratio of 75%, which is attributed to the presence of precipitate-free zones formed along grain boundaries during semisolid processing.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. M.J. Donachie, Titanium: a Technical Guide, ASM International, Materials Park, Michigan, 2000, p. 22.10.31399/asm.tb.ttg2.9781627082693 ↗
2. W.F. Ho, A comparison of tensile properties and corrosion behavior of cast Ti-7.5Mo with c.p. Ti, Ti-15Mo and Ti-6Al-4V alloys, J. Alloys Compd., 464(2008), No. 1–2, p. 580.
3. D.G. Eskin, Suytino, and L. Katgerman, Mechanical properties in the semi-solid state and hot tearing of aluminum alloys, Prog. Mater. Sci., 49(2004), No. 5, p. 629.10.1016/S0079-6425(03)00037-9 ↗
4. A.B. Phillion, S. Thompson, S.L. Cockcroft, and M.A. Wells, Tensile properties of as-cast aluminum alloys AA3104, AA6111 and CA31218 at above solidus temperatures, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 497(2008), No. 1–2, p. 388.10.1016/j.msea.2008.07.027 ↗
5. Y. Chino, M. Kobata, H. Iwasaki, and M. Mabuchi, An investigation of compressive deformation behaviour for AZ91 Mg alloy containing a small volume of liquid, Acta Mater., 51(2003), No. 11, p. 3309.10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00162-9 ↗
6. K. Hu, A.B. Phillion, D.M. Maijer, and S.L. Cockcroft, Constitutive behavior of as-cast magnesium alloy Mg-Al3-Zn1 in the semi-solid state, Scripta Mater., 60(2009), No. 6, p. 427.10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.11.011 ↗
7. R. Mohamed, T. Mitsuharu, and N. Hiroyuki, Effect of semi-solid processing on solidification microstructure and mechanical properties of gray cast iron, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 417(2006), No. 1–2, p. 166.
8. W. Püttgen, B. Hallstedt, W. Bleck, J.F. Löffler, and P.J. Uggowitzer, On the microstructure and properties of 100Cr6 steel processed in the semi-solid state, Acta Mater., 55(2007), No. 19, p. 6553.10.1016/j.actamat.2007.08.010 ↗
9. Q.Y. Sun, Z.T. Yu, R.H. Zhu, and H.C. Gu, Mechanical behavior and deformation mechanisms of Ti-2.5Cu alloy reinforced by nano-scale precipitates at 293 and 77 K, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 346(2004), No. 1–2, p. 159.10.1016/j.msea.2003.08.015 ↗
10. C.P. Chen and C.Y.A. Tsao, Semi-solid deformation of non-dendric structures: I. Phenomenological behavior, Acta Mater., 45(1996), No. 5, p. 1955.10.1016/S1359-6454(96)00312-6 ↗
11. J.F. Nie, Effects of precipitate shape and orientation on dispersion strengthening in magnesium alloys, Scripta Mater., 48(2003), No. 8, p. 1009.10.1016/S1359-6462(02)00497-9 ↗
12. Y.N. Chen, J.F. Wei, and Y.Q. Zhao, Compressive defor mation and forging behavior of Ti14 alloy in semi-solid state, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 520(2009), No. 1–2, p. 16.10.1016/j.msea.2009.05.003 ↗
13. Y.N. Chen, J.F. Wei, Y.Q. Zhao, and J. Sun, Effect of semisolid forging temperature on microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti14 alloy, J. Alloys Compd., 487(2009), No. 1–2, p. 314.10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.07.119 ↗
14. Y.Q. Zhao, W.L. Wu, X.D. Ma, H. Chang, H.Y. Yang, H. Wu, and L. Feng, Semi-solid oxidation and deformation behavior of Ti14 alloy, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 373(2004), No. 1–2, p. 315.10.1016/j.msea.2004.02.005 ↗
15. Y.Q. Zhao, W.L. Wu, and H. Chang, Research on microstructure and mechanical properties of a new α+Ti2Cu alloy after semi-solid deformation, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 416(2006), No. 1–2, p. 181.10.1016/j.msea.2005.10.038 ↗
16. Y.Q. Zhao, K.Y. Zhu, and Y. Li, A Low Cost Ti Alloy, Chinese Patent, Appl.02101189.3, 1997.
17. Y.Q. Zhao, K.Y. Zhu, and Y. Li, A Low Cost Near β-Ti Alloy, Chinese Patent, Appl.02101190.7, 1997.
18. H. Iwasaki, T. Mori, M. Mabuchi, and K. Higashi, Shear deformation behavior of Al-5% Mg in a semi-solid state, Acta Mater., 46(1998), No. 18, p. 6351.10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00330-9 ↗
19. Y.G Li, M.H. Loretto, D. Rugg, and W. Voice, Effect of heat treatment and exposure on microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-25V-15Cr-2Al-0.2C (wt%), Acta Mater., 49(2001), No. 15, p. 3011.10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00206-3 ↗