Modeling Hydraulic Fracture Entering Stress Barrier: Theory and Practical Recommendations
Source abstract
Abstract
Numerical modeling of hydraulic fracturing is complicated when a fracture reaches a stress barrier. For high barriers, it may require changing the computational scheme. In view of the strong influence of stress barriers on the final footprint and opening of a hydraulic fracture, for decades, their modeling has been the subject of special investigations. Actually, classical models of propagation within a pay layer with impenetrable boundaries referred to the case of extremely high-stress contrast in neighbor layers. Further improvements tended to account for the fracture growth in these layers by including stress contrasts as input parameters of a model. This tendency resulted in the suggestion and successive enhancements of pseudo-three-dimensional models. All of them have used stress intensity factors (SIFs) to characterize the combined resistance caused by stress contrasts, material strength, and fluid viscosity. Specifically, the SIFs served to formulate the conditions that control the front penetration into a neighbor layer. This key concept presents the background of our research. Despite examples of modeling propagation through barriers, there is no general theory clarifying when and why conventional schemes may become inefficient and how to overcome computational difficulties. This paper presents the theory and practical recommendations following it. We start with the definition of the barrier intensity, which exposes that the barrier strength may change from zero for contrast-free propagation to infinity for channelized propagation. The analysis reveals two types of computational difficulties caused by spatial discretization as follows: (i) general, arising for fine grids and aggravated by a barrier, and (ii) specific, caused entirely by a strong barrier. The asymptotic approach, which avoids spatial discretization, is suggested. It is illustrated by solving benchmark problems for barriers of arbitrary intensity. The analysis distinguishes three typical stages of the fracture penetration into a barrier and provides theoretical values of the Nolte–Smith slope parameter and arrest time as functions of the barrier intensity. Special analysis establishes the accuracy and bounds of the asymptotic approach. It appears that the approach provides physically significant and accurate results for fracture penetration into high, intermediate, and even weak stress barriers. On this basis, simple practical recommendations are given for modeling hydraulic fractures in rocks with stress barriers. The recommendations may be promptly implemented in any program using spatial discretization to model fracture propagation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis · Drilling and Well Engineering · Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
The Faculty of Mathematics and Applied Physics, Rzeszow University of Technology, al. Powstancow Warszawy 12, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland
References (62)
Show source-provided references
1. Widths of hydraulic fractures10.2118/89-PA ↗
2. Propagation of a vertical hydraulic fracture10.2118/3009-PA ↗
3. Settari, A., and Cleary, M.P. (February, January 31). Development and Testing of a Pseudo-Three-Dimensional Model of Hydraulic Fracture Geometry (p3dh). Proceedings of the 6th SPE symposium on reservoir simulation of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, New Orleans, LA, USA.
4. Development and testing of a pseudo-three-dimensional model of hydraulic fracture geometry10.2118/10505-PA ↗
5. Palmer, I.D., and Carroll, H.B. (1983, January 19–22). Numerical Solution for Height and Elongated Hydraulic Fractures. Proceedings of the SPE/DOE Low Permeability Gas Reservoirs Symposium, Denver, CO, USA.10.2523/11627-MS ↗
6. Three-dimensional hydraulic fracture propagation in the presence of stress variation
7. Palmer, I.D., and Craig, H.R. (1984, January 13–15). Modeling of Asymmetric Vertical Growth in Elongated Hydraulic Fractures and Application to First MWX Stimulation. Proceedings of the SPE/DOE/GRI Unconventional Gas Recovery Symposium, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.10.2523/12879-MS ↗
8. Meyer, B.R. (1986, January 18–21). Design Formulae for 2d and 3-d Vertical Hydraulic Fractures: Model Comparison and Parametric Studies. Proceedings of the Unconventional Gas Technology Symposium, Louisville, KY, USA.10.2523/15240-MS ↗
9. Microcomputer analysis of hydraulic fracture behavior with a pseudo-three-dimensional simulator10.2118/15305-PA ↗
10. Gidley, J.L., Holditch, S.A., Nierode, D.E., and Viatch, R.W. (1989). Rock Mechanics and Fracture Geometry. Recent Advances in Hydraulic Fracturing, Society of Petroleum Engineers.
11. Nolte, K.M. (2000). Mechanics of Hydraulic Fracturing. Economides, John Willey & Sons. [3rd ed.].
12. Computer simulation of hydraulic fractures10.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.11.006 ↗
13. A review of hydraulic fracture models and development of an improved pseudo-3D model for stimulating tight oil/gas sand
14. An enhanced pseudo-3D model for hydraulic fracturing accounting for viscous height growth, non-local elasticity, and lateral toughness10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.05.043 ↗
15. Improved pseudo three-dimensional model for hydraulic fractures under stress contrast10.1016/j.ijrmms.2020.104316 ↗
16. Two bonded half planes with a crack going through the interface10.1016/0020-7225(73)90004-9 ↗
17. The scaled flexibility matrix method for the efficient solution of boundary value problems in 2D and 3D layered elastic media10.1016/S0045-7825(01)00206-7 ↗
18. Analysis of a vertical crack in a multilayered medium10.1115/1.3176067 ↗
19. Three-dimensional analysis of cracking in a multilayers composite10.1115/1.2895928 ↗
20. Uniform asymptotic approximations for accurate modeling of cracks in layered elastic media10.1023/A:1010861821959 ↗
21. Markov, N.S. (2020). On problems of Mechanics for the Layered Structures with Inhomogeneities. [Ph.D. Thesis, Peter the Great Saint Petersburg Polytechnic University].
22. Nemat-Nasser, S., and Hori, M. (1993). Micromechanics: Overall Properties of Heterogeneous Materials, Elsevier.
23. Qu, J., and Cherakaoui, M. (2006). Fundamentals of Micromechanics of Solids, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470117835 ↗
24. Möri, A., Peruzzo, C., Garagash, D., and Lecampion, B. (2024). How stress barriers and fracture toughness heterogeneities arrest buoyant hydraulic fractures. Rock. Mech. Rock. Eng.10.1007/s00603-024-03936-0 ↗
25. Xu, W., Prioul, R., Berard, T., Weng, X., and Kresse, O. (2019, January 5–7). Barriers to hydraulic fracture height growth: A new model for sliding interfaces. Proceedings of the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference and Exhibition, Woodlands, TX, USA.10.2118/194327-MS ↗
26. Effect of stress and material barriers on hydraulic fracture height containment in layered formations10.1007/s12665-022-10370-4 ↗
27. Modeling multi-scale processes in hydraulic fracture propagation using the implicit level set algorithm10.1016/j.cma.2014.08.024 ↗
28. Implicit level set algorithms for modeling hydraulic fracture propagation10.1098/rsta.2015.0423 ↗
29. Explicit versus implicit front advancing schemes for the simulation of hydraulic fracture growth10.1002/nag.2898 ↗
30. An explicit algorithm for modeling planar 3D hydraulic fracture growth based on a super-time-stepping method10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2020.01.011 ↗
31. The study of options for identification of stress contrasts via pumping history10.1007/s00603-022-03071-8 ↗
32. An implicit level set method for modeling hydraulically driven fractures10.1016/j.cma.2008.01.013 ↗
33. Particle velocity, speed equation and universal asymptotics for efficient modelling of hydraulic fractures10.1016/j.jappmathmech.2015.04.018 ↗
34. Linkov, A.M. (2019). Modern Theory of Hydraulic Fracture Modeling with Using Explicit and Implicit Schemes. arXiv.
35. Self-similar solution of plane-strain fracture driven by a power-law fluid10.1002/nag.213 ↗
36. Propagation of a penny-shaped fluid-driven fracture in an impermeable rock: Asymptotic solutions10.1016/S0020-7683(02)00492-4 ↗
37. Study of Nordgren’s equation of hydraulic fracturing10.2118/18959-PA ↗
38. Self-similar solutions for elastohydrodynamic cavity flow
39. The crack tip region in hydraulic fracturing
40. The crack tip solution for hydraulic fracturing in a permeable solid10.1016/0022-5096(95)00026-F ↗
41. Multiscale tip asymptotics in hydraulic fracture with leak-off10.1017/S002211201000501X ↗
42. Mathematical Analysis in the Mechanics of Fracture
43. Solution of axisymmetric hydraulic fracture problem for thinning fluids10.1016/j.jappmathmech.2016.06.009 ↗
44. Solution of a plane hydrofracture problem with stress contrast10.1134/S0021894418020189 ↗
45. Zheltov, A.K., and Khristianovich, S.A. (1955, January 6–15). Formation of Vertical Fractures by Means of Highly Viscous Liquid. Proceedings of the 4th World Petroleum Congress, Rome, Italy.
46. A rapid method of predicting width and extent of hydraulically induced fractures10.2118/2458-PA ↗
47. A dual mesh multigrid preconditioner for the efficient solution of hydraulically driven fracture problems10.1002/nme.1330 ↗
48. Localized Jacobian ILU preconditioners for hydraulic fractures10.1002/nme.1528 ↗
49. Lebedev, V.I. (1997). An Introduction to Functional Analysis in Computational Mathematics, Birkhäuser.10.1007/978-1-4612-4128-7 ↗
50. Epperson, J.F. (2011). An Introduction to Numerical Methods and Analysis, John Wiley & Sons.
51. A stabilized Runge–Kutta–Legendre method for explicit super-time-stepping of parabolic and mixed equations10.1016/j.jcp.2013.08.021 ↗
52. Briggs, W.L., Henson, V.E., and McCormick, S.F. (2000). A Multigrid Tutorial, SIAM. [2nd ed.].10.1137/1.9780898719505 ↗
53. On decaying influence of initial conditions in the problem of hydraulic fracturing10.1134/S1028335816070119 ↗
54. Numerical solution of plane hydrofracture problem in modified formulation under arbitrary initial conditions10.1134/S1062739116020394 ↗
55. Muskhelishvili, N.I. (1975). Some Basic Problems of the Mathematical Theory of Elasticity, Noordhoff.
56. Muskhelishvili, N.I. (1953). Singular Integral Equations, Noordhoff.
57. Murakami, Y. (1990). Stress Intensity Factors Handbook, Pergamon Press.
58. Interpretation of fracturing pressures10.2118/8297-PA ↗
59. Gidley, J.L., Holditch, S.A., Nierode, D.E., and Viatch, R.W. (1989). Fracturing Pressure Analysis. Recent Advances in Hydraulic Fracturing, Society of Petroleum Engineers.
60. Yielding of steel sheets containing slits10.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-2 ↗
61. Gladkov, I.O., and Linkov, A.M. (2017). Khristianovich-Geertsma-de Clerk problem with stress contrasts. arXiv.
62. A new efficient algorithm for solving differential-algebraic systems using implicit backward differential scheme10.1109/PROC.1972.8562 ↗