journal article·2024-11-09Open access

Effects of Mechanized Irrigation Protocols on Endodontic Obturation Using Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer

Lucas David Galvani, Antonia Patricia Oliveira Barros, Joatan Lucas de Sousa Gomes Costa, Eliane Cristina Gulin de Oliveira, Ester Alves Ferreira Bordini, Luís Geraldo Vaz, Milton Carlos Kuga

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 22

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of mechanized final irrigation protocols (XPE, XP-Endo Finisher; XPC, XP-Clean; and ECL, Easy Clean) compared to PUI (passive ultrasonic irrigation) on the debris incidence and open dentinal tubules, and their effects on the adhesion interface after 48 h and 6 months. One hundred twenty maxillary central incisors were submitted to chemical–mechanical preparation using a rotary instrument and 2.5% sodium hypochlorite. Specimens were distributed in 4 groups (n = 30) in accordance with the mechanized final irrigation protocol: XPE, XPC, ECL, or PUI. Forty specimens (n = 10/group) were submitted to SEM analysis to evaluate the residue incidence and dentin open tubules. The other specimens were obturated using Bio-C Sealer and submitted to push-out bond strength and adhesive failure mode evaluations in the cervical, middle, and apical thirds after 48 h or 6 months (n = 10/group). Only in the apical third, ECL presented the highest residue incidence and fewer open dentinal tubules when compared to the XPE, XPC, and PUI groups (p < 0.05). In the cervical and middle root thirds, no significant differences were observed regardless of the group evaluated (p > 0.05). After 48 h, ECL resulted in the lowest bond strength only in the apical third (p < 0.05), while the XPE, XPC, and PUI groups remained similar in the cervical and middle thirds (p > 0.05). At 6 months, all groups showed lower bond strength values regardless of the root third evaluated, but ECL showed the lowest bond strength in the apical and middle root thirds when compared to the other groups (p < 0.05). The ECL protocol did not provide adequate residue removal on the apical radicular third and negatively affected the longevity of endodontic obturation using a calcium silicate-based sealer.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments · Dental Radiography and Imaging · Dental materials and restorations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry at Araraquara, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araraquara 14801-395, SP, Brazil

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Estácio de Sá University Center, Ribeirão Preto 14096-160, SP, Brazil

Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araraquara 14801-395, SP, Brazil

Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte 31270-901, MG, Brazil

Department of Dental Materials and Prosthesis, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto 14040-904, SP, Brazil

Funding

CAPES

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. Clinical implications of the smear layer in endodontics: A review10.1067/moe.2002.128962 ↗
2. Investigation of the efficacy of passive ultrasonic irrigation versus irrigation with reciprocating activation: An environmental scanning electron microscopic study10.1016/j.joen.2016.01.016 ↗
3. In Vitro Evaluation of Smear Layer and Debris Removal and Antimicrobial Activity of Different Irrigating Solutions10.14744/eej.2023.19042 ↗
4. Comparative evaluation of effect of Nisin incorporated ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid and MTAD on endodontic biofilm eradication, smear layer removal and depth of sealer penetration10.1007/s00784-023-05285-8 ↗
5. The effect of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine as irrigant solutions for root canal disinfection: A systematic review of clinical trials10.1016/j.joen.2015.12.021 ↗
6. Antibacterial Efficacy of Octenisept, Alexidine, Chlorhexidine, and Sodium Hypochlorite against Enterococcus faecalis Biofilms10.1016/j.joen.2016.09.013 ↗
7. Effectiveness of several solutions to prevent the formation of precipitate due to the interaction between sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine and its effect on bond strength of an epoxy-based sealer10.1111/iej.12337 ↗
8. Penetration into dentin of sodium hypochlorite associated with acid solutions10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.05.040 ↗
9. Effect of Passive Ultrasonic Activation on Organic Tissue Dissolution from Simulated Grooves in Root Canals Using Sodium Hypochlorite with or without Surfactants and EDTA10.1016/j.joen.2017.01.041 ↗
10. Evaluation of different passive ultrasonic irrigation protocols on the removal of dentinal debris from artificial grooves10.1590/0103-6440201600725 ↗
11. Penetration depth of sodium hypochlorite in dentinal tubules after conventional irrigation, passive ultrasonic agitation and Nd: YAG laser activated irrigation10.15171/jlms.2016.18 ↗
12. In vitro comparison of passive and continuous ultrasonic irrigation in curved root canals
13. Temperature Changes during Ultrasonic Irrigation with Different Inserts and Modes of Activation10.1016/j.joen.2009.01.007 ↗
14. Disinfection of root canals with photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming10.1016/j.joen.2011.03.016 ↗
15. Micro-CT evaluation of four final irrigation protocols on hard-tissue debris removal from mesial roots of mandibular molars containing isthmus10.1007/s00784-022-04561-3 ↗
16. Effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher, EndoActivator, and File agitation on debris and smear layer removal in curved root canals: A comparative study10.1007/s10266-016-0251-8 ↗
17. Ex vivo evaluation of four final irrigation protocols on the removal of hard-tissue debris from the mesial root canal system of mandibular first molars10.1111/iej.12630 ↗
18. Adjunctive Steps for Disinfection of the Mandibular Molar Root Canal System: A Correlative Bacteriologic, Micro–Computed Tomography, and Cryopulverization Approach10.1016/j.joen.2016.08.003 ↗
19. Efficacy of 4 Irrigation Protocols in Killing Bacteria Colonized in Dentinal Tubules Examined by a Novel Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope Analysis10.1016/j.joen.2016.03.009 ↗
20. Comparative Analysis of Dentinal Erosion after Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation versus Irrigation with Reciprocating Activation: An Environmental Scanning Electron Study10.1016/j.joen.2016.09.016 ↗
21. Comparative bioactivity and immunomodulatory potential of the new Bioroot Flow and AH Plus Bioceramic sealer: An in vitro study on hPDLSCs10.1007/s00784-024-05593-7 ↗
22. Solubility of bioceramic- and epoxy resin-based root canal sealers: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1111/aej.12487 ↗
23. Assessment of the impact of XP-Endo Finisher file on push-out bond strength of various endodontic sealers10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_189_23 ↗
24. Effect of Ultrasonic Activation of Irrigants on Smear Layer Removal10.1016/j.joen.2015.03.023 ↗
25. Evaluation of dentin desensitization protocols on the dentinal surface and their effects on the dentin bond interface10.1016/j.jdent.2018.06.002 ↗
26. A New Solution for the Removal of the Smear Layer10.1097/00004770-200303000-00002 ↗
27. Nonvital Tooth Bleaching: A Review of the Literature and Clinical Procedures10.1016/j.joen.2007.12.020 ↗
28. Activated irrigation vs. Conventional non-activated irrigation in endodontics—A systematic review
29. Montaser, O.K., Fayyad, D.M., and Abdelsalam, N. (2023). Efficacy of different irrigant activation techniques for cleaning root canal anastomosis. BMC Oral Health, 23.10.1186/s12903-023-02835-0 ↗
30. Li, Y., Wang, Z., Bao, P., Meng, T., Liu, M., Li, H., Shen, Y., Liu, D., Jia, Z., and Liu, H. (2023). Cleaning and Disinfecting Oval-Shaped Root Canals: Ex Vivo Evaluation of Three Rotary Instrumentation Systems with Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation. Medicina, 59.10.3390/medicina59050962 ↗
31. Emotional Intelligence in Public Relations Instruction: Content Analysis of Introductory Textbooks and Codes of Ethics
32. Comparative Effectiveness of New Mechanical Irrigant Agitating Devices for Debris Removal from the Canal and Isthmus of Mesial Roots of Mandibular Molars10.1016/j.joen.2016.10.009 ↗
33. Physicochemical properties of AH plus bioceramic sealer, Bio-C Sealer, and ADseal root canal sealer10.1186/s13005-023-00403-z ↗
34. Solubility evaluation of different root canal sealing materials10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1643 ↗
35. Al-Haddad, A., and Aziz, Z.A.C.A. (2016). Bioceramic-Based Root Canal Sealers: A Review. Int. J. Biomater., 2016.10.1155/2016/9753210 ↗
36. What do different tests tell about the mechanical and biological properties of bioceramic materials?10.1111/etp.12076 ↗
37. Sealer penetration into dentinal tubules in the presence or absence of smear layer: A confocal laser scanning microscopic study10.1016/j.joen.2014.03.019 ↗
38. Influence of bioceramic cones on the quality of root canal filling relative to bond strength and adaptation of the adhesive interface10.1007/s00784-023-05385-5 ↗
39. Cyclic Fatigue of Reciproc and Reciproc Blue Nickel-titanium Reciprocating Files at Different Environmental Temperatures10.1016/j.joen.2018.06.006 ↗
40. Yum, H.-W., Oh, S., Perinpanayagam, H., Gu, Y., Chang, S.-W., Yoo, Y.-J., and Kum, K.-Y. (2024). Phase Transformation and Mechanical Behaviour of Different Heat-Treated Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments. Int. Dent. J., 12.10.1016/j.identj.2024.07.1211 ↗