journal article·2015-03

Evolution of insoluble eutectic Si particles in anodic oxidation films during adipic-sulfuric acid anodizing processes of ZL114A aluminum alloys

Lei Hua, Jian-hua Liu, Song-mei Li, Mei Yu, Lei Wang, Yong-xin Cui

Publisher page

Abstract

The effects of insoluble eutectic Si particles on the growth of anodic oxide films on ZL114A aluminum alloy substrates were investigated by optical microscopy (OM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The anodic oxidation was performed at 25°C and a constant voltage of 15 V in a solution containing 50 g/L sulfuric acid and 10 g/L adipic acid. The thickness of the formed anodic oxidation film was approximately 7.13 μm. The interpore distance and the diameters of the major pores in the porous layer of the film were within the approximate ranges of 10–20 nm and 5–10 nm, respectively. Insoluble eutectic Si particles strongly influenced the morphology of the anodic oxidation films. The anodic oxidation films exhibited minimal defects and a uniform thickness on the ZL114A substrates; in contrast, when the front of the oxide oxidation films encountered eutectic Si particles, defects such as pits and non-uniform thickness were observed, and pits were observed in the films.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Anodic Oxide Films and Nanostructures · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · Concrete Corrosion and Durability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. D. Brungs, Technical Report: light weight design with light metal castings, Mater. Des., 18(1997), No. 4–6, p. 285.10.1016/S0261-3069(97)00065-4 ↗
2. N.D. Alexopoulos and Sp.G. Pantelakis, Quality evaluation of A357 cast aluminum alloy specimens subjected to different artificial aging treatment, Mater. Des., 25(2004), No. 5, p. 419.10.1016/j.matdes.2003.11.007 ↗
3. L. Ceschini, A. Morri, A. Morri, A. Gamberini, and S. Messieri, Correlation between ultimate tensile strength and solidification microstructure for the sand cast A357 aluminium alloy, Mater. Des., 30(2009), No. 10, p. 4525.10.1016/j.matdes.2009.05.012 ↗
4. P.R. Roberge, Corrosion Engineering: Principles and Practice, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2008, p. 603.
5. F. Mansfeld and M.W. Kendig, Evaluation of anodized aluminum surfaces with electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, J. Electrochem. Soc., 135(1988), No. 4, p. 828..10.1149/1.2095786 ↗
6. L.E. Fratila-Apachitei, J. Duszczyk, and L. Katgerman, Voltage transients and morphology of AlSi(Cu) anodic oxide layers formed in H2SO4 at low temperature, Surf. Coat. Technol., 157(2002), No. 1, p. 80.10.1016/S0257-8972(02)00144-5 ↗
7. L.E. Fratila-Apachitei, H. Terryn, P. Skeldon, G.E. Thompson, J. Duszczyk, and L. Katgerman, Influence of substrate microstructure on the growth of anodic oxide layers, Electrochim. Acta, 49(2004), No. 7, p. 1127.10.1016/j.electacta.2003.10.024 ↗
8. Y. Liu, M.A. Arenas, P. Skeldon, G.E. Thompson, P. Bailey, T.C.Q. Noakes, H. Habazaki, and K. Shimizu, Anodic behaviour of a model second phase: Al-20at.%Mg-20at.%Cu, Corros. Sci., 48(2006), No. 5, p. 1225.10.1016/j.corsci.2005.05.007 ↗
9. N. Dimitrov, J.A. Mann, M. Vukmirovic, and K. Sieradzki, Dealloying of Al2CuMg in alkaline media, J. Electrochem. Soc., 147(2000), No. 9, p. 3283.10.1149/1.1393896 ↗
10. Y. Liu, M.A. Arenas, P. Skeldon, G.E. Thompson, H. Habazaki, K. Shimizu, P. Bailey, and T.C.Q. Noakes, Generation of copper nanoparticles during alkaline etching of an Al-30at.%Cu alloy, Corros. Sci., 48(2006), No. 8, p. 1874.10.1016/j.corsci.2005.07.011 ↗
11. J. Liu, M. Li, H. Sheng, S. Li, G. Chen, and M. Yu, A Method of Non-chromium Anodic Oxidation Process to 2XXX and 7XXX Aluminum Alloys, Chinese Patent, Appl. 200910087530.3, 2009.
12. M. Yu, G.H. Chen, J.H. Liu, and S.H. Li, Adipic-sulfuric acid anodizing for LY12CZ aluminum alloy, J. Beijing Univ. Aeronaut. Astronaut., 38(2012), No. 3, p. 363.
13. M. Yu, G.H. Chen, J.H. Liu, S.M. Li, Y.D. Li, and Z. Liu, Effect of adipic acid on fatigue performance of sulfuric anodizing for aluminum alloy, Heat Treat. Met., 36(2011), No. 6, p. 50.
14. J.H. Liu, Z. Liu, M. Yu, S.M. Li, and G.H. Chen, Properties of aluminum alloy anodic films formed in three kinds of solutions, Chin. J. Nonferrous Met., 22(2012), No. 7, p. 2031.
15. M. Curioni, M. Saenz de Miera, P. Skeldon, G.E. Thompson, and J. Ferguson, Macroscopic and local filming behavior of AA2024 T3 aluminum alloy during anodizing in sulfuric acid electrolyte, J. Electrochem. Soc., 155(2008), No. 8, p. C387.10.1149/1.2931522 ↗
16. V.P. Parkhutik, V.T. Belov, and M.A. Chernyckh, Study of aluminium anodization in sulphuric and chromic acid solutions: II. Oxide morphology and structure, Electrochim. Acta, 35(1990), No. 6, p. 961.10.1016/0013-4686(90)90028-X ↗
17. V. Moutarlier, M.P. Gigandet, and J. Pagetti, Characterisation of pitting corrosion in sealed anodic films formed in sulphuric, sulphuric/molybdate and chromic media, Appl. Surf. Sci., 206(2003), No. 1–4, p. 237.10.1016/S0169-4332(02)01240-0 ↗