Reliable Augmentation and Precise Identification of EPG Waveforms Based on Multi-Criteria DCGAN
Source abstract
Abstract
The electrical penetration graph (EPG) technique is of great significance in elucidating the mechanisms of virus transmission by piercing-sucking insects and crop resistance to these insects. The traditional method of manually processing EPG signals encounters the drawbacks of inefficiency and subjectivity. This study investigated the data augmentation and automatic identification of various EPG signals, including A, B, C, PD, E1, E2, and G, which correspond to distinct behaviors exhibited by the Asian citrus psyllid. Specifically, a data augmentation method based on an improved deep convolutional generative adversarial network (DCGAN) was proposed to address the challenge of insufficient E1 waveforms. A multi-criteria evaluation framework was constructed, leveraging maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) to evaluate the similarity between the generated and real data, and singular value decomposition (SVD) was incorporated to optimize the training iterations of DCGAN and ensure data diversity. Four models, convolutional neural network (CNN), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), decision tree (DT), and support vector machine (SVM), were established based on DCGAN to classify the EPG waveforms. The results showed that the parameter-optimized DCGAN strategy significantly improved the model accuracies by 5.8%, 6.9%, 7.1%, and 7.9% for DT, SVM, KNN, and CNN, respectively. Notably, DCGAN-CNN effectively addressed the skewed distribution of EPG waveforms, achieving an optimal classification accuracy of 94.13%. The multi-criteria optimized DCGAN-CNN model proposed in this study enables reliable augmentation and precise automatic identification of EPG waveforms, holding significant practical implications for understanding psyllid behavior and controlling citrus huanglongbing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Electrical Measurement Techniques · ECG Monitoring and Analysis · Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
Center for Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture, School of Future Technology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
Funding
Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province, China · Educational Scientific Research Project for Middle-Aged and Young Teachers of Fujian Provincial Department of Education (Science and Technology Category), China
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Chemical control of the Asian citrus psyllid and of huanglongbing disease in citrus10.1002/ps.3957 ↗
2. Current epidemiological understanding of citrus huanglongbing10.1146/annurev-phyto-073009-114418 ↗
3. Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri, vector of citrus huanglongbing disease10.1111/eea.12025 ↗
4. Guidelines for conducting, analyzing, and interpreting electrical penetration graph (EPG) experiments on herbivorous piercing–sucking insects10.1111/eea.13434 ↗
5. Waveforms Eavesdropping Prevention Framework: The Case of Classification of EPG Waveforms of Aphid Utilizing Wavelet Kernel Extreme Learning Machine10.1080/08839514.2023.2214766 ↗
6. Tjallingii, W.F. (2000). Comparison of AC and DC systems for electronic monitoring of stylet penetration activities by homopterans. Principles and Applications of Electronic Monitoring and Other Techniques in the Study of Homopteran Feeding Behavior, Entomological Society of America.10.4182/EXYL6038.2000.41 ↗
7. The AC–DC correlation monitor: New EPG design with flexible input resistors to detect both R and emf components for any piercing–sucking hemipteran10.1016/j.jinsphys.2009.05.007 ↗
8. A technique for electronically recording aphid feeding and salivation10.1038/2021358a0 ↗
9. Tracking the Feeding Mechanism of Sap-Sucking Insect-Pests Through Electropenetrography (EPG)10.1007/s10905-024-09850-1 ↗
10. A2EPG: A new software for the analysis of electrical penetration graphs to study plant probing behaviour of hemipteran insects10.1016/j.compag.2015.02.005 ↗
11. Willett, D.S., George, J., Willett, N.S., Stelinski, L.L., and Lapointe, S.L. (2016). Machine learning for characterization of insect vector feeding. PLoS Comput. Biol., 12.10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005158 ↗
12. Ramezan, C.A., Warner, T.A., Maxwell, A.E., and Price, B.S. (2021). Effects of training set size on supervised machine-learning land-cover classification of large-area high-resolution remotely sensed data. Remote Sens., 13.10.3390/rs13030368 ↗
13. Generative adversarial networks10.1145/3422622 ↗
14. Generative adversarial networks in computer vision: A survey and taxonomy
15. Extending the spectral database of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy with generative adversarial nets10.1364/OE.27.006958 ↗
16. Hyperspectral imaging combined with generative adversarial network (GAN)-based data augmentation to identify haploid maize kernels10.1016/j.jfca.2021.104346 ↗
17. Hatamian, F.N., Ravikumar, N., Vesal, S., Kemeth, F.P., Struck, M., and Maier, A. (2020, January 4–8). The effect of data augmentation on classification of atrial fibrillation in short single-lead ECG signals using deep neural networks. Proceedings of the ICASSP 2020—2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Barcelona, Spain.10.1109/ICASSP40776.2020.9053800 ↗
18. Tjallingii, W. (2024, June 01). EPG Systems. Available online: https://www.epgsystems.eu/epg-measuring.
19. Psyllids as major vectors of plant pathogens10.1127/entomologia/2021/1289 ↗
20. Salivary secretions by aphids interacting with proteins of phloem wound responses10.1093/jxb/erj088 ↗
21. Characterization of electrical penetration graphs of the Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri, in sweet orange seedlings10.1111/j.1570-7458.2009.00937.x ↗
22. Radford, A. (2015). Unsupervised representation learning with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks. arXiv.
23. A survey of convolutional neural networks: Analysis, applications, and prospects10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3084827 ↗
24. Deep convolutional neural networks [lecture notes]10.1109/MSP.2018.2842646 ↗
25. A survey of the recent architectures of deep convolutional neural networks10.1007/s10462-020-09825-6 ↗
26. Stergiou, A., Poppe, R., and Kalliatakis, G. (2021, January 11–17). Refining activation downsampling with SoftPool. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, Montreal, BC, Canada.10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.01019 ↗
27. MMD aggregated two-sample test
28. Rethinking maximum mean discrepancy for visual domain adaptation10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3093468 ↗
29. Li, C.-L., Chang, W.C., Cheng, Y., Yang, Y., and Póczos, B. (2017). Mmd gan: Towards deeper understanding of moment matching network. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, MIT Press.10.1007/978-3-319-70139-4 ↗
30. Bińkowski, M., Sutherland, D.J., Arbel, M., and Gretton, A. (2018). Demystifying mmd gans. arXiv.
31. Jayasumana, S., Ramalingam, S., Veit, A., Glasner, D., Chakrabarti, A., and Kumar, S. (2024, January 17–21). Rethinking fid: Towards a better evaluation metric for image generation. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.00889 ↗
32. Interpreting area under the receiver operating characteristic curve10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00188-1 ↗
33. Classification assessment methods10.1016/j.aci.2018.08.003 ↗