A Graph Convolutional Network-Based Method for Congested Link Identification
Source abstract
Abstract
Accurate and efficient congested link identification is crucial in wireless sensor networks (WSNs). However, in some networks with a centralized management architecture, it is often not feasible to monitor large numbers of internal links directly or even impossible in some heterogeneous networks. Network tomography, the science of inferring the performance characteristics of a network’s interior by correlating sets of end-to-end measurements, was put forward to solve this problem. Nevertheless, a network always contains more links than end-to-end paths, making it problematic to find a determined solution. To solve this problem, most of the current methods try to use some additional prerequisites, such as the link congestion probability. However, most existing studies have not considered the congestion caused by node factors and the case of multiple congested links on one path. In this paper, we initially model the issue of link congestion as a Bayesian network model (BNM). Subsequently, we introduce a congestion link identification method based on graph convolutional networks (GCNs), novelly converting the intricate Bayesian network solving problem into a graph node classification task. The simulation results validate the feasibility of our proposed algorithm in identifying congested links and underscore its advantages in scenarios involving node congestion and multiple congested links.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques · Network Security and Intrusion Detection · Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Information and Communications Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
The 54th Research Institute of CETC, Shijiazhuang 050081, China
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Viani, F., Rocca, P., Oliveri, G., and Massa, A. (2012, January 26–30). Pervasive remote sensing through WSNs. Proceedings of the 2012 6th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EUCAP), Prague, Czech Republic.10.1109/EuCAP.2012.6206049 ↗
2. Kandris, D., Nakas, C., Vomvas, D., and Koulouras, G. (2020). Applications of Wireless Sensor Networks: An Up-to-Date Survey. Appl. Syst. Innov., 3.10.3390/asi3010014 ↗
3. Popescu, D., Stoican, F., Stamatescu, G., Ichim, L., and Dragana, C. (2020). Advanced UAV—WSN System for Intelligent Monitoring in Precision Agriculture. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20030817 ↗
4. An intelligent WSN-UAV-based IoT framework for precision agriculture application10.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.107912 ↗
5. Lanzolla, A., and Spadavecchia, M. (2021). Wireless sensor networks for environmental monitoring. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21041172 ↗
6. Ullo, S.L., and Sinha, G.R. (2020). Advances in Smart Environment Monitoring Systems Using IoT and Sensors. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20113113 ↗
7. Qin, Z., Denker, G., Giannelli, C., Bellavista, P., and Venkatasubramanian, N. (2014, January 5–9). A software defined networking architecture for the internet-of-things. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Network Operations and Management Symposium (NOMS), Krakow, Poland.10.1109/NOMS.2014.6838365 ↗
8. A case for centrally controlled wireless sensor networks10.1016/j.comnet.2012.12.019 ↗
9. Comprehensive review on congestion detection, alleviation, and control for IoT networks
10. Delay-Aware Routing in Software-Defined Networks Via Network Tomography and Reinforcement Learning10.1109/TNSE.2024.3371384 ↗
11. Network tomography: Estimating source-destination traffic intensities from link data10.1080/01621459.1996.10476697 ↗
12. Network tomography of binary network performance characteristics10.1109/TIT.2006.885460 ↗
13. Nguyen, H.X., and Thiran, P. (2007, January 6–12). The boolean solution to the congested IP link location problem: Theory and practice. Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM 2007—26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications, Anchorage, AK, USA.10.1109/INFCOM.2007.245 ↗
14. Minimizing probing cost and achieving identifiability in probe-based network link monitoring10.1109/TC.2011.244 ↗
15. Network topology inference with partial information10.1109/TNSM.2015.2451032 ↗
16. Xue, L., Marina, M.K., Li, G., and Zheng, K. (November, January 30). Paint: Path aware iterative network tomography for link metric inference. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 30th International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP), Lexington, KY, USA.10.1109/ICNP55882.2022.9940432 ↗
17. Arrigoni, V., Bartolini, N., Massini, A., and Trombetti, F. (2021, January 10–13). Failure localization through progressive network tomography. Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM 2021—IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1109/INFOCOM42981.2021.9488893 ↗
18. Stealthy dgos attack against network tomography: The role of active measurements10.1109/TNSE.2021.3070990 ↗
19. He, T., Ma, L., Swami, A., and Towsley, D. (2021). Network Tomography: Identifiability, Measurement Design, and Network State Inference, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108377119 ↗
20. Rkhami, A., Hadjadj-Aoul, Y., Rubino, G., and Outtagarts, A. (2021, January 7–10). On the use of machine learning and network tomography for network slices monitoring. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 22nd International Conference on High Performance Switching and Routing (HPSR), Paris, France.10.1109/HPSR52026.2021.9481795 ↗
21. Network Tomography with Partial Topology Knowledge and Dynamic Routing10.1007/s10922-023-09763-y ↗
22. Duffield, N. (2003, January 27–29). Simple network performance tomography. Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement, Miami Beach, FL, USA.
23. Tsang, Y., Yildiz, M., Barford, P., and Nowak, R. (2004, January 25–27). Network radar: Tomography from round trip time measurements. Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement, Sicily, Italy.10.1145/1028788.1028809 ↗
24. Server-based inference of internet performance
25. Pan, S., Li, P., Zeng, D., Zhang, Z., Guo, S., and Liang, Y.C. (2020, January 8–10). Learning-Based Network Boolean Tomography for Identifying Congested Links with Correlations. Proceedings of the GLOBECOM 2020-2020 IEEE Global Communications Conference, Taipei, Taiwan.10.1109/GLOBECOM42002.2020.9348038 ↗
26. A Q-learning based framework for congested link identification10.1109/JIOT.2019.2930459 ↗
27. Probabilistic fault diagnosis in communication systems through incremental hypothesis updating10.1016/j.comnet.2004.01.007 ↗
28. Kandula, S., Katabi, D., and Vasseur, J.P. (2005, January 26). Shrink: A tool for failure diagnosis in IP networks. Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Mining Network Data, Philadelphia, PA, USA.10.1145/1080173.1080178 ↗
29. Ee, C.T., and Bajcsy, R. (2004, January 3–5). Congestion control and fairness for many-to-one routing in sensor networks. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, Baltimore, MD, USA.10.1145/1031495.1031513 ↗
30. Upstream congestion control in wireless sensor networks through cross-layer optimization10.1109/JSAC.2007.070514 ↗
31. Wei, W., Wang, B., Towsley, D., and Kurose, J. (2003, January 27–29). Model-based identification of dominant congested links. Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement, Miami Beach, FL, USA.10.1145/948217.948220 ↗
32. Identify congested links based on enlarged state space10.1007/s11390-016-1631-9 ↗
33. Identify congested links with network tomography under multipath routing10.1007/s10922-018-9471-2 ↗
34. Schlichtkrull, M., Kipf, T.N., Bloem, P., Van Den Berg, R., Titov, I., and Welling, M. (2018, January 3–7). Modeling relational data with graph convolutional networks. Proceedings of the Semantic Web: 15th International Conference, ESWC 2018, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.10.1007/978-3-319-93417-4_38 ↗
35. T-GCN: A temporal graph convolutional network for traffic prediction10.1109/TITS.2019.2935152 ↗