journal article·2024-10-10Open access

Are There Seven Symbols for the Nucleotide-Based Genetic Code?

Adam Kłóś, Przemysław M. Płonka, Krzysztof Baczyński

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 20

Abstract

The common assumption is that genetic information is built on a four-symbol alphabet, i.e., DNA nucleotides, the smallest meaningful blocks of genomes are codon triplets, and the record of genetic information does not contain any asserted symbols playing the role of the space. It is, however, well known that some nucleotides in some codons are redundant. Our study, therefore, tests the alternative scenario. As the same nucleotide may play various semiotic roles, the genomic alphabet actually contains seven semiotic symbols. Consequently, the meaningful fragments of genomes (words) can be of different sizes, and there are asserted symbols in the record of genomic information. If this is true, then, similarly to natural languages, the frequency-range of these genomic words should follow the power-law distribution. The presented hypothesis was tested, in comparison to competitive (codon-based and n-tuple) forms of tokenization, on a wide range of genomic texts.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms · CRISPR and Genetic Engineering · Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Biophysics and Cancer Biology, Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Jagiellonian University, 31-007 Krakow, Poland

Faculty of Philosophy, The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, 31-002 Krakow, Poland

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Avalanching and Self Organised Criticality, a paradigm for geomagnetic activity?10.1023/A:1005236717469 ↗
2. Multiplicative noise and second order phase transitions10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.030601 ↗
3. Evidence of linguistic structure in the Voynich manuscript using spectral analysis10.1080/0161-110191889932 ↗
4. Smith, R. (2008). Investigation of the Zipf-plot of the extinct Meroitic language. arXiv.
5. Ferrer-I-Cancho, R., and Elvevåg, B. (2010). Random texts do not exhibit the real ZIPF’s Law-Like rank distribution. PLoS ONE, 5.10.1371/journal.pone.0009411 ↗
6. Identifying spatio-temporal dynamics of Ebola in Sierra Leone using virus genomes10.1098/rsif.2017.0583 ↗
7. Klaus, A., Yu, S., and Plenz, D. (2011). Statistical analyses support power law distributions found in neuronal avalanches. PLoS ONE, 6.10.1371/journal.pone.0019779 ↗
8. Lopes, A.M., and Machado, J.A.T. (2018). Power law behaviour in complex systems. Entropy, 20.10.3390/e20090671 ↗
9. The frequency distribution of gene family sizes in complete genomes10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025959 ↗
10. Guo, Z., Jiang, W., Lages, N., Borcherds, W., and Wang, D. (2014). Relationship between gene duplicability and diversifiability in the topology of biochemical networks. BMC Genom., 15.10.1186/1471-2164-15-577 ↗
11. Zipf’s law unzipped10.1088/1367-2630/13/4/043004 ↗
12. Gene Regulatory Network Analysis for Triple-Negative Breast neoplasms by using gene expression data10.4048/jbc.2017.20.3.240 ↗
13. Sex-Biased networks and nodes of sexually antagonistic conflict in Drosophila10.1155/2013/545392 ↗
14. Ensembles, dynamics, and cell types: Revisiting the statistical mechanics perspective on cellular regulation10.1016/j.jtbi.2019.01.036 ↗
15. Kalankesh, L.R., Stevens, R., and Brass, A. (2012). The language of gene ontology: A Zipf’s law analysis. BMC Bioinform., 13.10.1186/1471-2105-13-127 ↗
16. Monod, J. (1971). Chance and Necessity, Vintage Books.
17. Pollack, R. (1995). Signs of Life: The Language and Meanings of DNA, Penguin.
18. The genetic language: Grammar, semantics, evolution
19. Genomics and natural language processing10.1038/nrg861 ↗
20. Zipf, K.G. (1949). Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology, Addison-Wesley Press.
21. Least effort and the origins of scaling in human language10.1073/pnas.0335980100 ↗
22. Linguistic features of noncoding DNA sequences10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.3169 ↗
23. Possible origin of power-law behavior inn-tuple Zipf analysis10.1103/PhysRevE.53.6371 ↗
24. Gan, X., Wang, D., and Han, Z. (2009). N-Tuple ZIPF analysis and modeling for language, computer program and DNA. arXiv.
25. Is DNA a language?10.1006/jtbi.1996.0239 ↗
26. Information Theory and Algorithmic Complexity: Applications to linguistic discourses and DNA sequences as complex systems Part I: Efficiency of the genetic code of DNA10.1076/0929-6174(200008)07:02;1-Z;FT129 ↗
27. Malevergne, Y., Pisarenko, V., and Sornette, D. (2009). Gibrat’s Law for Cities: Uniformly most powerful unbiased test of the pareto against the lognormal. SSRN Electron. J., 09-40.10.2139/ssrn.1479481 ↗
28. Power-Law distributions in empirical data10.1137/070710111 ↗
29. Alstott, J., Bullmore, E., and Plenz, D. (2014). powerlaw: A Python Package for Analysis of Heavy-Tailed Distributions. PLoS ONE, 9.10.1371/journal.pone.0085777 ↗
30. Self-organization in vowel systems10.1006/jpho.2000.0125 ↗
31. Random Language Model10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.128301 ↗
32. Language Origin from an Emergentist Perspective10.1093/applin/aml033 ↗
33. Grzybek, P., and Köhler, R. (2007). Exact Methods in the Study of Language and Text, De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110894219 ↗
34. Selforganization of matter and the evolution of biological macromolecules10.1007/BF00623322 ↗
35. Eigen, M., and Schuster, P. (1979). The Hypercycle: A Principle of Natural Self-Organization, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-67247-7 ↗
36. RNA evolution and the origins of life10.1038/338217a0 ↗
37. Greenberg, J.H. (1963). The problem of universals in language. Universals of Language, MIT Press.
38. Milewski, T. (1967). Jezykoznawstwo, Panstwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
39. Double articulation as a criterion of linguisticity10.1016/S0388-0001(84)80003-0 ↗
40. Barbieri, M. (2003). The Organic Codes: An Introduction to Semantic Biology, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511614019 ↗
41. Barbieri, M. (2015). Code Biology: A New Science of Life, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-14535-8 ↗
42. Some effects of intermittent silence10.2307/1419346 ↗
43. Oldfield, R.C., and Marchall, J.C. (1968). Information Theory and Psycholinguistics, Penguin Books.
44. Random texts exhibit Zipf’s-law-like word frequency distribution10.1109/18.165464 ↗
45. Zipf’s law re-visited
46. Wolfram, S. (2002). A New Kind of Science, Wolfram Media.
47. The challenges of statistical patterns of language: The case of Menzerath’s law in genomes
48. Zipf’s word frequency law in natural language: A critical review and future directions10.3758/s13423-014-0585-6 ↗