Improvement of Mechanical Properties of 3D Bioprinted Structures through Cellular Overgrowth
Source abstract
Abstract
The common use of hydrogel materials in 3D bioprinting techniques is dictated by the unique properties of hydrogel bioinks, among which some of the most important in terms of sustaining vital cell functions in vitro in 3D cultures are the ability to retain large amounts of liquid and the ability to modify rigidity and mechanical properties to reproduce the structure of the natural extracellular matrix. Due to their high biocompatibility, non-immunogenicity, and the possibility of optimizing rheological properties and bioactivity at the same time, one of the most commonly used hydrogel bioink compositions are polymer solutions based on sodium alginate and gelatin. In 3D bioprinting techniques, it is necessary for hydrogel printouts to feature an appropriate geometry to ensure proper metabolic activity of the cells contained inside the printouts. The desired solution is to obtain a thin-walled printout geometry, ensuring uniform nutrient availability and gas exchange during cultivation. Within this study’s framework, tubular bioprinted structures were developed based on sodium alginate and gelatin, containing cells of the immortalized fibroblast line NIH/3T3 in their structure. Directly after the 3D printing process, such structures are characterized by extremely low mechanical strength. The purpose of this study was to perform a comparative analysis of the viability and spreading ability of the biological material contained in the printouts during their incubation for a period of 8 weeks while monitoring the effect of cellular growth on changes in the mechanical properties of the tubular structures. The observations demonstrated that the cells contained in the 3D printouts reach the ability to grow and spread in the polymer matrix after 4 weeks of cultivation, leading to obtaining a homogeneous, interconnected cell network inside the hydrogel after 6 weeks of incubation. Analysis of the mechanical properties of the printouts indicates that with the increasing time of cultivation of the structures, the degree of their overgrowth by the biological material contained inside, and the progressive degradation of the polymer matrix process, the tensile strength of tubular 3D printouts varies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Cellular Mechanics and Interactions · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Materials Science and Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Lodz University of Technology, 90-537 Lodz, Poland
Faculty of Electrical, Electronic, Computer and Control Engineering, Lodz University of Technology, 90-537 Lodz, Poland
Funding
National Centre for Research and Development
References (78)
Show source-provided references
1. Development of 3D bioprinting: From printing methods to biomedical applications10.1016/j.ajps.2019.11.003 ↗
2. Kačarević, Ž.P., Rider, P.M., Alkildani, S., Retnasingh, S., Smeets, R., Jung, O., Ivanišević, Z., and Barbeck, M. (2018). An introduction to 3D bioprinting: Possibilities, challenges and future aspects. Materials, 11.10.3390/ma11112199 ↗
3. Ke, D., Niu, C., and Yang, X. (2022). Evolution of 3D bioprinting-from the perspectives of bioprinting companies. Bioprinting, 25.10.1016/j.bprint.2022.e00193 ↗
4. Advancements of 3D bioprinting in regenerative medicine: Exploring cell sources for organ fabrication10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24593 ↗
5. Gillispie, G., Prim, P., Copus, J., Fisher, J., Mikos, A.G., Yoo, J.J., Atala, A., and Lee, S.J. (2020). Assessment methodologies for extrusion-based bioink printability. Biofabrication, 12.10.1088/1758-5090/ab6f0d ↗
6. Biofabrication: A Guide to Technology and Terminology10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.10.015 ↗
7. Panwar, A., and Tan, L.P. (2016). Current status of bioinks for micro-extrusion-based 3D bioprinting. Molecules, 21.10.3390/molecules21060685 ↗
8. Recent Advances in Extrusion-Based 3D Printing for Biomedical Applications10.1002/adhm.201701161 ↗
9. Łabowska, M.B., Cierluk, K., Jankowska, A.M., Kulbacka, J., Detyna, J., and Michalak, I. (2021). A review on the adaption of alginate-gelatin hydrogels for 3D cultures and bioprinting. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14040858 ↗
10. Kaliaraj, G.S., Shanmugam, D.K., Dasan, A., and Mosas, K.K.A. (2023). Hydrogels—A Promising Materials for 3D Printing Technology. Gels, 9.10.3390/gels9030260 ↗
11. Dell, A.C., Wagner, G., Own, J., and Geibel, J.P. (2022). 3D Bioprinting Using Hydrogels: Cell Inks and Tissue Engineering Applications. Pharmaceutics, 14.10.3390/pharmaceutics14122596 ↗
12. 3D bioprinting of skin tissue: From pre-processing to final product evaluation10.1016/j.addr.2018.07.016 ↗
13. Agrawal, A., and Hussain, C.M. (2023). 3D-Printed Hydrogel for Diverse Applications: A Review. Gels, 9.10.3390/gels9120960 ↗
14. Gopinathan, J., and Noh, I. (2018). Recent trends in bioinks for 3D printing. Biomater. Res., 22.10.1186/s40824-018-0122-1 ↗
15. On the progress of hydrogel-based 3D printing: Correlating rheological properties with printing behaviour10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.121506 ↗
16. 3D printing of hydrogels: Rational design strategies and emerging biomedical applications10.1016/j.mser.2020.100543 ↗
17. Axpe, E., and Oyen, M.L. (2016). Applications of alginate-based bioinks in 3D bioprinting. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 17.10.3390/ijms17121976 ↗
18. Leonardo, M., Prajatelistia, E., and Judawisastra, H. (2022). Alginate-based bioink for organoid 3D bioprinting: A review. Bioprinting, 28.10.1016/j.bprint.2022.e00246 ↗
19. 3D Bioplotting of Gelatin/Alginate Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering: Influence of Crosslinking Degree and Pore Architecture on Physicochemical Properties10.1016/j.jmst.2016.01.007 ↗
20. Engineering alginate as bioink for bioprinting10.1016/j.actbio.2014.06.034 ↗
21. Liu, F., Chen, Q., Liu, C., Ao, Q., Tian, X., Fan, J., Tong, H., and Wang, X. (2018). Natural polymers for organ 3D bioprinting. Polymers, 10.10.3390/polym10111278 ↗
22. Freeman, F.E., and Kelly, D.J. (2017). Tuning alginate bioink stiffness and composition for controlled growth factor delivery and to spatially direct MSC Fate within bioprinted tissues. Sci. Rep., 7.10.1038/s41598-017-17286-1 ↗
23. 3D printed silk-gelatin hydrogel scaffold with different porous structure and cell seeding strategy for cartilage regeneration
24. Sawyer, S.W., Takeda, K., Alayoubi, A., Mirdamadi, E., Zidan, A., Bauer, S.R., and Degheidy, H. (2023). 3D bioprinting optimization of human mesenchymal stromal cell laden gelatin-alginate-collagen bioink. Biomed. Mater., 18.10.1088/1748-605X/aca3e7 ↗
25. Extrusion-based 3D bioprinting of alginate-based tissue constructs10.1016/j.procir.2020.06.007 ↗
26. Time dependent gelling properties of cuboid alginate gels made by external gelation method: Effects of alginate-CaCl2 solution ratios and pH10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.12.022 ↗
27. Savić Gajić, I.M., Savić, I.M., and Svirčev, Z. (2023). Preparation and Characterization of Alginate Hydrogels with High Water-Retaining Capacity. Polymers, 15.10.3390/polym15122592 ↗
28. Alginate Blocks and Block Polysaccharides: A Review10.1002/masy.202200072 ↗
29. Alginate-based biomaterials for regenerative medicine applications10.3390/ma6041285 ↗
30. Gorroñogoitia, I., Urtaza, U., Zubiarrain-Laserna, A., Alonso-Varona, A., and Zaldua, A.M. (2022). A Study of the Printability of Alginate-Based Bioinks by 3D Bioprinting for Articular Cartilage Tissue Engineering. Polymers, 14.10.3390/polym14020354 ↗
31. Alginate hydrogels of varied molecular weight distribution enable sustained release of sphingosine-1-phosphate and promote angiogenesis10.1002/jbm.a.36217 ↗
32. Controlling alginate gel degradation utilizing partial oxidation and bimodal molecular weight distribution10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.06.044 ↗
33. Alginate: Properties and biomedical applications10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.06.003 ↗
34. Alginate derivatization: A review of chemistry, properties and applications10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.01.007 ↗
35. Hydrogel-based commercial products for biomedical applications: A review10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.118803 ↗
36. Advancing bioinks for 3D bioprinting using reactive fillers: A review10.1016/j.actbio.2020.06.040 ↗
37. Liu, S., Yang, H., Chen, D., Xie, Y., Tai, C., Wang, L., Wang, P., and Wang, B. (2022). Three-dimensional bioprinting sodium alginate/gelatin scaffold combined with neural stem cells and oligodendrocytes markedly promoting nerve regeneration after spinal cord injury. Regen. Biomater., 9.10.1093/rb/rbac038 ↗
38. Wang, X., Ao, Q., Tian, X., Fan, J., Tong, H., Hou, W., and Bai, S. (2017). Gelatin-based hydrogels for organ 3D bioprinting. Polymers, 9.10.3390/polym9090401 ↗
39. Kaliampakou, C., Lagopati, N., Pavlatou, E.A., and Charitidis, C.A. (2023). Alginate–Gelatin Hydrogel Scaffolds; An Optimization of Post-Printing Treatment for Enhanced Degradation and Swelling Behavior. Gels, 9.10.3390/gels9110857 ↗
40. Sonaye, S.Y., Ertugral, E.G., Kothapalli, C.R., and Sikder, P. (2022). Extrusion 3D (Bio)Printing of Alginate-Gelatin-Based Composite Scaffolds for Skeletal Muscle Tissue Engineering. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15227945 ↗
41. 3D bioprinting of a gelatin-alginate hydrogel for tissue-engineered hair follicle regeneration10.1016/j.actbio.2022.03.011 ↗
42. Mohammadrezaei, D., Moghimi, N., Vandvajdi, S., Powathil, G., Hamis, S., and Kohandel, M. (2023). Predicting and elucidating the post-printing behavior of 3D printed cancer cells in hydrogel structures by integrating in-vitro and in-silico experiments. Sci. Rep., 13.10.1038/s41598-023-28286-9 ↗
43. High-resolution 3D Bioprinting System for Fabricating Cell-laden Hydrogel Scaffolds with High Cellular Activities10.1016/j.procir.2017.04.017 ↗
44. Solvent types used for the preparation of hydrogels determine their mechanical properties and influence cell viability through gelatine and calcium ions release10.1002/jbm.b.35152 ↗
45. Wierzbicka, A., Bartniak, M., Rosińska, K., and Bociaga, D. (2022). Optimization of the preparation process stages of the bioink compositions based on sodium alginate and gelatin to improve the viability of biological material contained in hydrogel 3D printouts. Eng. Biomater., 25.
46. (2024, July 12). Scientific Image and Illustration Software BioRender. Available online: https://www.biorender.com/.
47. Majumder, N., Mishra, A., and Ghosh, S. (2022). Effect of varying cell densities on the rheological properties of the bioink. Bioprinting, 28.10.1016/j.bprint.2022.e00241 ↗
48. Gregory, T., Benhal, P., Scutte, A., Quashie, D., Harrison, K., Cargill, C., Grandison, S., Savitsky, M.J., Ramakrishnan, S., and Ali, J. (2022). Rheological characterization of cell-laden alginate-gelatin hydrogels for 3D biofabrication. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 136.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105474 ↗
49. Gao, T., Gillispie, G.J., Copus, J.S., Pr, A.K., Seol, Y.J., Atala, A., Yoo, J.J., and Lee, S.J. (2018). Optimization of gelatin-alginate composite bioink printability using rheological parameters: A systematic approach. Biofabrication, 10.10.1088/1758-5090/aacdc7 ↗
50. Relationship between shear-thinning rheological properties of bioinks and bioprinting parameters
51. Extrusion-based 3D (Bio)Printed Tissue Engineering Scaffolds: Process-Structure-Quality Relationships10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c00598 ↗
52. 3D Bioprinting of Cell-Laden Hydrogels for Improved Biological Functionality10.1002/adma.202103691 ↗
53. Introduction to cell-hydrogel mechanosensing10.1098/rsfs.2013.0038 ↗
54. Investigating the interplay between substrate stiffness and ligand chemistry in directing mesenchymal stem cell differentiation within 3D macro-porous substrates10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.04.026 ↗
55. Hydrogels for engineering of perfusable vascular networks10.3390/ijms160715997 ↗
56. A 3D cell printed muscle construct with tissue-derived bioink for the treatment of volumetric muscle loss10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.03.036 ↗
57. Development and evaluation of a multicomponent bioink consisting of alginate, gelatin, diethylaminoethyl cellulose and collagen peptide for 3D bioprinting of tissue construct for drug screening application10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.02.191 ↗
58. Boucard, E., Vidal, L., Coulon, F., Mota, C., Hascoët, J.Y., and Halary, F. (2022). The degradation of gelatin/alginate/fibrin hydrogels is cell type dependent and can be modulated by targeting fibrinolysis. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 10.10.3389/fbioe.2022.920929 ↗
59. Andreazza, R., Morales, A., Pieniz, S., and Labidi, J. (2023). Gelatin-Based Hydrogels: Potential Biomaterials for Remediation. Polymers, 15.10.3390/polym15041026 ↗
60. Mechanical behaviour of alginate-gelatin hydrogels for 3D bioprinting10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.12.018 ↗
61. Investigation of swelling/degradation behaviour of alginate beads crosslinked with Ca2+ and Ba2+ ions10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2004.01.002 ↗
62. Khatun, M.R., Bhattacharyya, A., Gunbayar, M., Jung, M., and Noh, I. (2023). Study on Bioresponsive Gelatin-Hyaluronic Acid-Genipin Hydrogel for High Cell-Density 3D Bioprinting. Gels, 9.10.20944/preprints202306.2020.v1 ↗
63. Martinez-Garcia, F.D., Fischer, T., Hayn, A., Mierke, C.T., Burgess, J.K., and Harmsen, M.C. (2022). A Beginner’s Guide to the Characterization of Hydrogel Microarchitecture for Cellular Applications. Gels, 8.10.3390/gels8090535 ↗
64. Matrix mechanical plasticity regulates cancer cell migration through confining microenvironments10.1038/s41467-018-06641-z ↗
65. Dynamic phototuning of 3D hydrogel stiffness10.1073/pnas.1421897112 ↗
66. Gong, C., Kong, Z., and Wang, X. (2021). The effect of agarose on 3d bioprinting. Polymers, 13.10.3390/polym13224028 ↗
67. Patiño Vargas, M.I., Martinez-Garcia, F.D., Offens, F., Becerra, N.Y., Restrepo, L.M., van der Mei, H.C., Harmsen, M.C., van Kooten, T.G., and Sharma, P.K. (2022). Viscoelastic properties of plasma-agarose hydrogels dictate favorable fibroblast responses for skin tissue engineering applications. Biomater. Adv., 139.10.1016/j.bioadv.2022.212967 ↗
68. Effects of extracellular matrix viscoelasticity on cellular behaviour10.1038/s41586-020-2612-2 ↗
69. Hydrogels with tunable stress relaxation regulate stem cell fate and activity10.1038/nmat4489 ↗
70. Koch, M., and Włodarczyk-Biegun, M.K. (2020). Faithful scanning electron microscopic (SEM) visualization of 3D printed alginate-based scaffolds. Bioprinting, 20.10.1016/j.bprint.2020.e00098 ↗
71. (2024, July 12). 3D Cell Culture vs. Traditional 2D Cell Culture Explained. Available online: https://www.mimetas.com/en/blogs/345/3d-cell-culture-vs--traditional-2d-cell-culture-explained.html.
72. Marga, F., Jakab, K., Khatiwala, C., Shepherd, B., Dorfman, S., Hubbard, B., Colbert, S., and Gabor, F. (2012). Toward engineering functional organ modules by additive manufacturing. Biofabrication, 4.10.1088/1758-5082/4/2/022001 ↗
73. Du Plessis, L.H., Gouws, C., and Nieto, D. (2024). The influence of viscosity of hydrogels on the spreading and migration of cells in 3D bioprinted skin cancer models. Front. Cell Dev. Biol., 12.10.3389/fcell.2024.1391259 ↗
74. Force and focal adhesion assembly: A close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates10.1038/35074532 ↗
75. Quantitative characterization of 3D bioprinted structural elements under cell generated forces10.1038/s41467-019-10919-1 ↗
76. Chen, C., Bai, X., Ding, Y., and Lee, I.S. (2019). Electrical stimulation as a novel tool for regulating cell behavior in tissue engineering. Biomater. Res., 23.10.1186/s40824-019-0176-8 ↗
77. Cooper, D., and Dimri, M. (2023). Biochemistry, Calcium Channels. StatPearls [Internet], StatPearls Publishing.
78. The effects of osmotic stress on the structure and function of the cell nucleus10.1002/jcb.22437 ↗