journal article·2024-10-04Open access

A Study of the Multi-Objective Neighboring Only Quadratic Minimum Spanning Tree Problem in the Context of Uncertainty

Debosree Pal, Haresh Kumar Sharma, Olegas Prentkovskis, Falguni Chakraborty, Lijana Maskeliūnaitė

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 19

Abstract

The pursuit of studying the quadratic minimum spanning tree (QMST) problem has captivated numerous academics because of its distinctive characteristic of taking into account the cost of interaction between pairs of edges. A QMST refers to the minimum spanning tree, which is a graph that is both acyclic and minimally connected. It also includes the interaction cost between a pair of edges in the minimum spanning tree. These interaction costs can occur between any pair of edges, whether they are adjacent or non-adjacent. In the QMST problem, our objective is to minimize both the cost of the edges and the cost of interactions. This eventually classifies the task as NP-hard. The interaction costs, sometimes referred to as quadratic costs, inherently exhibit a contradictory relationship with linear edge costs when solving a multi-objective problem that aims to minimize both linear and quadratic costs simultaneously. This study addresses the bi-objective adjacent only quadratic minimum spanning tree problem (AQMSTP) by incorporating the uncertain nature of the linear and quadratic costs associated with the problem. The focus is on the interaction costs between adjacent edges. Consequently, we have introduced a multi-objective problem called the uncertain adjacent only quadratic minimum spanning tree problem (mUAQMSTP) and formulated it using the uncertain chance-constrained programming technique. Afterwards, two MOEAs—non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGAII) and duplicate elimination non-dominated sorting evolutionary algorithm (DENSEA)—and the traditional multi-objective solution approach, the global criterion method, are employed to solve the deterministic transformation of the model. Finally, we provide a suitable numerical illustration to substantiate our suggested framework.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods · Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization · Optimization and Mathematical Programming

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Boinchee Binapani Balika Vidyalaya, Boinchigram, Pandua 712135, India

Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, India

Area of Operations and Decision Sciences, Birla Institute of Management Technology, Greater Noida 201306, India

Department of Mobile Machinery and Railway Transport, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, LT-10105 Vilnius, Lithuania

Department of Masters of Computer Applications, Dr. B.C. Roy Engineering College, Durgapur 713206, India

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. The quadratic minimum spanning tree problem10.1002/1520-6750(199204)39:3<399::AID-NAV3220390309>3.0.CO;2-0 ↗
2. Solving the Minimum Quadratic Spanning Tree Problem
3. The quadratic minimum spanning tree problem and its variations10.1016/j.disopt.2017.09.003 ↗
4. An effective genetic algorithm approach to the quadratic minimum spanning tree problem10.1016/S0305-0548(97)00039-7 ↗
5. Metaheuristic approaches for the quadratic minimum spanning tree problem
6. A swarm intelligence approach to the quadratic minimum spanning tree problem10.1016/j.ins.2010.05.001 ↗
7. The quadratic minimum spanning tree problem: A lower bounding procedure and an efficient search algorithm10.1016/j.cor.2010.01.004 ↗
8. Stronger lower bounds for the quadratic minimum spanning tree problem with adjacency costs10.1016/j.endm.2013.05.097 ↗
9. Tabu search with strategic oscillation for the quadratic minimum spanning tree10.1080/0740817X.2013.768785 ↗
10. Lower bounds for the quadratic minimum spanning tree problem based on reduced cost computation10.1016/j.cor.2015.06.005 ↗
11. The quadratic cycle cover problem: Special cases and efficient bounds10.1007/s10878-020-00547-7 ↗
12. Semidefinite programming lower bounds and branch-and-bound algorithms for the quadratic minimum spanning tree problem10.1016/j.ejor.2019.07.038 ↗
13. The linearization problem of a binary quadratic problem and its applications10.1007/s10479-021-04310-x ↗
14. Sotirov, R., and Verchére, Z. (2024). The Quadratic Minimum Spanning Tree Problem: Lower Bounds via Extended Formulation. Vietnam J. Math.10.1007/s10013-024-00694-y ↗
15. On the bi-objective adjacent only quadratic spanning tree problem10.1016/j.endm.2013.05.135 ↗
18. Liu, B. (2007). Uncertainty Theory, Springer. [2nd ed.].
19. Knowledge acquisition in vague objective information systems based on rough sets10.1111/j.1468-0394.2010.00512.x ↗
20. Uncertain multi-objective multi-item fixed charge solid transportation problem10.1007/s00500-017-2987-7 ↗
21. Complex intuitionistic fuzzy power aggregation operators and their applications in multi-criteria decision-making10.1111/exsy.12325 ↗
22. Decision-making under uncertainty through extending influence diagrams with interval-valued parameters10.1111/exsy.12277 ↗
23. Risk prediction of product-harm events using rough sets and multiple classifier fusion: An experimental study of listed companies in China10.1111/exsy.12148 ↗
24. Approximation algorithms for 2-stage stochastic optimization problems
25. A learning automata-based heuristic algorithm for solving the minimum spanning tree problem in stochastic graphs10.1007/s11227-010-0484-1 ↗
26. The minimum spanning tree problem with fuzzy costs10.1007/s10700-008-9030-5 ↗
27. Fuzzy α-minimum spanning tree problem: Definition and solutions10.1080/03081079.2015.1086578 ↗
28. Modelling and application of fuzzy adaptive minimum spanning tree in tourism agglomeration area division10.1016/j.knosys.2017.06.007 ↗
29. Fuzzy quadratic minimum spanning tree problem
30. Uncertain Quadratic Minimum Spanning Tree Problem10.12720/jcm.9.5.385-390 ↗
31. Rao, S.S. (2006). Engineering Optimization-Theory and Practice, New Age International Publishers. [3rd ed.].
32. A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGAII10.1109/4235.996017 ↗
33. Greiner, D., Emperador, J.M., Winter, G., and Galván, B. (2007, January 5–8). Improving computational mechanics optimum design using helper objectives: An application in frame bar structures. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Evolutionary Multi Criterion Optimization, EMO 2007, Matsushima, Japan. Vol. 4403 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
34. Liu, B. (2010). Uncertainty Theory: A Branch of Mathematics for Modeling Human Uncertainty, Springer.
35. Chance-constrained programming10.1287/mnsc.6.1.73 ↗
36. Some research problems in uncertainty theory
37. Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms: A comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach10.1109/4235.797969 ↗
38. Van Veldhuizen, D.A., and Lamont, G.B. (1998). Multi-objective evolutionary algorithm research: A history and analysis. Technical Report TR-98-03, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson, AFB.
39. jMetal: A Java framework for multi-objective optimization10.1016/j.advengsoft.2011.05.014 ↗
40. Letter-value plots: Boxplots for large data10.1080/10618600.2017.1305277 ↗
41. Confidence intervals rather than p values; estimation rather than hypothesis testing10.1136/bmj.292.6522.746 ↗
42. Nebro, J., Alba, E., Molina, G., Chicano, F., Luna, F., and Durillo, J.J. (2007, January 7–11). Optimal antenna placement using a new multi-objective chc algorithm. Proceedings of the GECCO’07: Proceedings of the 9th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, London, UK.10.1145/1276958.1277128 ↗