journal article·2024-09-27Open access

Mechanical Behaviors of a New Polymer-Based Restorative Material for Immediate Loading: An In Vitro Comparative Study

Milena Pisano, Łukasz Zadrożny, Anna Di Marzio, Ignazio Kurti, Silvio Mario Meloni, Aurea Immacolata Lumbau, Francesco Mollica, Mario Cesare Pozzan, Santo Catapano, Rafał Maksymilian Molak, Gabriele Cervino, Marco Tallarico

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 19

Abstract

The aim of the present in vitro comparative study is to validate a novel composite polymer, named “ONLY”, developed to overcome the mechanical drawbacks of conventional, metal-reinforced poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) interim restoration. Ten interim restorations were designed and fabricated (five in the composite “ONLY” group, and five in the metal-reinforced PMMA group). All the samples were screwed into the prototype models, simulating a complete edentulous mandible rehabilitated with six straight implants. Outcome measures were break point (load, N) and displacement (mm) through a static compression test, and material behavior through a dynamic cyclic test method (fatigue test). A total of 20 samples were tested (10 for static and 10 for dynamic). In each group, five samples (test and control) were used. All the specimens completed the mechanical tests, as planned. There was no statistically significant difference between groups for any test. In the test group, the break point was 1953.19 ± 543.73 N, while it was 2031.10 ± 716.68 N in the control group (p = 0.775). The displacement was 1.89 ± 0.34 mm in the test group and 1.98 ± 0.75 mm in the control group (p = 0.763). Using the dynamic cyclic test method, in the control group the mean load was 2504.60 ± 972.15 N, while in the test group the mean load was 3382.00 ± 578.50 N. The difference between groups was 877.40 ± 579.30 N (p value = 0.121). Within the limitations of this in vitro study, the novel composite polymer can be used to immediately load dental implants. Further clinical research is needed to confirm these preliminary results.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Concrete and Cement Materials Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Medicine, Surgery, and Pharmacy, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy

Department of Dental Propaedeutics and Prophylaxis, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, 59 Nowogrodzka Street, 02-006 Warsaw, Poland

Department of Engineering, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy

Department of Prosthodontics, University of Ferrara, Via Luigi Borsari 46, 44121 Ferrara, Italy

Faculty of Materials Science and Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, 141 Wołoska Street, 02-507 Warsaw, Poland

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Dentistry and Morphological and Functional Imaging, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria 1, 98125 Messina, Italy

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Leslie, P., and Broll, J. (2022). Eating, Drinking, and Swallowing Difficulties: The Impacts on, and of, Religious Beliefs. Geriatrics, 7.10.3390/geriatrics7020041 ↗
2. Thorsteinsdottir, S., Njardvik, U., Bjarnason, R., and Olafsdottir, A.S. (2022). Changes in Eating Behaviors Following Taste Education Intervention: Focusing on Children with and without Neurodevelopmental Disorders and Their Families: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Nutrients, 14.10.3390/nu14194000 ↗
3. Sasajima, M., Yoshihara, A., and Odajima, A. (2021). Effects of Oral Function Training and Oral Health Status on Physical Performance in Potentially Dependent Older Adults. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18.10.3390/ijerph182111348 ↗
4. Ogino, Y. (2022). Oral Rehabilitation from Oral and Dental Diseases. Healthcare, 10.10.3390/healthcare10102065 ↗
5. Lin, L.H., Granatelli, J., Alifui-Segbaya, F., Drake, L., Smith, D., and Ahmed, K.E. (2021). A Proposed In Vitro Methodology for Assessing the Accuracy of Three-Dimensionally Printed Dental Models and the Impact of Storage on Dimensional Stability. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11135994 ↗
6. Sartoretto, S.C., Shibli, J.A., Javid, K., Cotrim, K., Canabarro, A., Louro, R.S., Lowenstein, A., Mourão, C.F., and Moraschini, V. (2023). Comparing the Long-Term Success Rates of Tooth Preservation and Dental Implants: A Critical Review. J. Funct. Biomater., 14.10.3390/jfb14030142 ↗
7. Five-Year Prospective Study on Implant Failure and Marginal Bone Remodeling Expected Using Bone Level Implants with Sandblasted/Acid-Etched Surface and Conical Connection10.1055/s-0041-1739439 ↗
8. Retrospective Analysis on Survival Rate, Template-Related Complications, and Prevalence of Peri-implantitis of 694 Anodized Implants Placed Using Computer-Guided Surgery: Results Between 1 and 10 Years of Follow-Up10.11607/jomi.5930 ↗
9. Tallarico, M., Ceruso, F.M., Muzzi, L., Meloni, S.M., Kim, Y.J., Gargari, M., and Martinolli, M. (2019). Effect of Simultaneous Immediate Implant Placement and Guided Bone Reconstruction with Ultra-Fine Titanium Mesh Membranes on Radiographic and Clinical Parameters after 18 Months of Loading. Materials, 12.10.3390/ma12101710 ↗
10. Five-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Patients Rehabilitated with Immediately Loaded Maxillary Cross-Arch Fixed Dental Prosthesis Supported by Four or Six Implants Placed Using Guided Surgery10.1111/cid.12380 ↗
11. Accuracy of surgical templates with and without metallic sleeves in case of partial arch restorations: A systematic review10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103852 ↗
12. Heboyan, A., Zafar, M.S., Karobari, M.I., and Tribst, J.P.M. (2022). Insights into Polymeric Materials for Prosthodontics and Dental Implantology. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15155383 ↗
13. Tigmeanu, C.V., Ardelean, L.C., Rusu, L.-C., and Negrutiu, M.-L. (2022). Additive Manufactured Polymers in Dentistry, Current State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives-A Review. Polymers, 14.10.3390/polym14173658 ↗
14. Clinical Outcomes of Metal-Ceramic versus Metal-Acrylic Resin Implant-Supported Fixed Complete Dental Prostheses: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis10.11607/ijp.7592 ↗
15. An up to 7-Year Retrospective Analysis of Biologic and Technical Complication With the All-on-4 Concept10.1563/aaid-joi-D-15-00098 ↗
16. A systematic review of biologic and technical complications with fixed implant rehabilitations for edentulous patients
17. Survival rates and prosthetic complications of implant fixed complete dental prostheses: An up to 5-year retrospective study10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.11.022 ↗
18. Jung, S.W., Fan, Y.Q., and Lee, C. (2022). Digital Workflow for Edentulous Patients with Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses: A Fully Digital Technique. Dent. J., 10.10.3390/dj10090174 ↗
19. Digital Workflow for Prosthetically Driven Implants Placement and Digital Cross Mounting: A Retrospective Case Series10.3390/prosthesis4030029 ↗
20. Paradowska-Stolarz, A., Malysa, A., and Mikulewicz, M. (2022). Comparison of the Compression and Tensile Modulus of Two Chosen Resins Used in Dentistry for 3D Printing. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15248956 ↗
21. Pantea, M., Ciocoiu, R.C., Greabu, M., Ripszky Totan, A., Imre, M., Țâncu, A.M.C., Sfeatcu, R., Spînu, T.C., Ilinca, R., and Petre, A.E. (2022). Compressive and Flexural Strength of 3D-Printed and Conventional Resins Designated for Interim Fixed Dental Prostheses: An In Vitro Comparison. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15093075 ↗
22. Effect of cyclic loading and resin cement type used for luting fiber posts on bond strength at different root levels of crown-restored human teeth10.1080/01694243.2016.1209355 ↗
23. Serife, K., and Gulfem, E. (2023). Bond strength of various post-core restorations with different lengths and diameters following cycle loading. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 142.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.105804 ↗
24. The accuracy of static computer-aided implant surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1111/clr.13346 ↗
25. Milled PMMA, a Material for Long-Term Implant Supported Fixed Complete Dental Prostheses10.11607/ijp.8420 ↗
26. Roato, I., Genova, T., Duraccio, D., Ruffinatti, F.A., Zanin Venturini, D., Di Maro, M., Mosca Balma, A., Pedraza, R., Petrillo, S., and Chinigò, G. (2023). Mechanical and Biological Characterization of PMMA/Al2O3 Composites for Dental Implant Abutments. Polymers, 15.10.3390/polym15153186 ↗