journal article·2024-09-08Open access

Yield Behaviour of Welded I-Shaped Steel Cross-Sections

Luigi Palizzolo, Salvatore Benfratello

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 17

Abstract

The limit behaviour of I-shaped welded steel cross-sections subjected to axial force, shear, and bending moment is a crucial matter to ascertain the reliability of framed structures constituted by non-standard beam elements. International standards provide an approximate solution to the problem, and other studies have proposed improved approximate formulations to ascertain the real features of the relevant cross-sections. The present paper is devoted to enhancing the problem of the limit behaviour of plane I-shaped welded steel cross-sections subjected to axial force N, shear T and bending moment M; therefore, new appropriate formulations are proposed in order to define suitable new domains, both in planes N,T, N,M, and M,T and in the space N,T,M. The material is assumed as elastic–perfectly plastic and the Von Mises limit condition is adopted as the resistance criterion. The elastic stresses are described by the Navier formula and the Jourawski formula. The limit stress condition related to the contemporaneous presence of the acting forces is defined as the one that, at each point of the cross-section, fulfils the Von Mises limit condition as equality. The formulation is rigorously devoted to factory-made welded I-shaped steel cross-sections. Some numerical examples are reported in the application stage and useful comparison are carried out, with the results being obtainable by the application of the classical known standard formulae, proving the reliability and effectiveness of the determined domains.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Engineering, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, I-90128 Palermo, Italy

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. Gokhfeld, D.A., and Cherniavsky, D.F. (1980). Limit Analysis of Structures at Thermal Cycling, Springer.
2. Limit load and shakedown analysis of plastic structures under stochastic uncertainty10.1016/j.cma.2008.04.022 ↗
3. Palizzolo, L., Benfratello, S., Tabbuso, P., and Vazzano, S. (2019, January 15–19). Reliable measures of plastic deformations for elastic plastic structures in shakedown conditions. Proceedings of the 24th Conference of the Italian Association of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, AIMETA 2019, Rome, Italy.
4. Chen, W., and Duan, L. (2021). Plasticity, Limit Analysis, Stability and Structural Design: An Academic Life Journey from Theory to Practice, World Scientific.10.1142/12083 ↗
5. Performance-based design optimization of tall concrete framed structures subject to wind excitations10.1016/j.jweia.2015.01.005 ↗
6. An efficient framework for the elasto-plastic reliability assessment of uncertain wind excited systems10.1016/j.strusafe.2015.09.001 ↗
7. Evaluation of the shakedown limit load multiplier for stochastic seismic actions10.1007/s11012-016-0600-2 ↗
8. Seismic evaluation of friction spring-based self-centering braced frames based on life-cycle cost10.1002/eqe.3728 ↗
9. Life-cycle benefits estimation for hybrid seismic-resistant self-centering braced frames10.1002/eqe.3914 ↗
10. Banichuk, N.V. (1990). Introduction to Optimization of Structures, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4612-3376-3 ↗
11. Optimal design of steel frame using practical nonlinear inelastic analysis10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00053-6 ↗
12. Improved harmony search algorithms for sizing optimization of truss structures10.1016/j.compstruc.2011.10.022 ↗
13. Benfratello, S., Giambanco, F., Palizzolo, L., and Tabbuso, P. (2012, January 4–7). Structural design of frames able to prevent element buckling. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computational Structures Technology, CST 2012, Civil-Comp Proceedings, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
14. Optimal design of steel frames accounting for buckling10.1007/s11012-013-9745-4 ↗
15. Minimum volume design of structures with constraints on ductility and stability10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.02.025 ↗
16. Discrete variable design of frames subjected to seismic actions accounting for element slenderness10.1016/j.compstruc.2014.09.016 ↗
17. Performed-based seismic design of steel frames utilizing charged system search optimization10.1016/j.asoc.2014.05.012 ↗
18. Optimal design of elastic plastic frames accounting for seismic protection devices10.1007/s00158-013-0959-9 ↗
19. Optimal design of self-centering braced frames with limited self-centering braces10.1016/j.jobe.2024.109201 ↗
20. Optimization of structures with unrestricted dynamic shakedown constraints10.1007/s00158-015-1245-9 ↗
21. Seismic Performance of Earthquake-Resilient RC Frames Made with HSTC Beams and Friction Damper Devices10.1080/13632469.2021.1964652 ↗
22. Design of RC joints equipped with hybrid trussed beams and friction dampers10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111442 ↗
23. Friction-based beam-to-column connection for low-damage RC frames with hybrid trussed beams
24. Plumier, A., Doneux, C., Castiglioni, C., Brescianini, J., Crespi, A., Dell’ Anna, S., Lazzarotto, L., Calado, L., Ferreira, J., and Feligioni, S. (2006). Two Innovations for Earthquake Resistant Design—The INERD Project—Final Report, Available online: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/ccd50305-1c81-4eea-b937-fa05f81e2b18/language-en.
25. The dogbone: A new idea to chew on
26. The dogbone: Back to the future10.62913/engj.v34i2.680 ↗
27. Experimental investigation of dogbone moment connections10.62913/engj.v35i4.711 ↗
28. Lessons learned from the Northridge earthquake10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00031-X ↗
29. Lessons from damage to steel buildings during the Northridge earthquake10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00032-1 ↗
30. Seismic performance of steel moment frames with reduced beam sections10.1016/S0141-0296(99)00048-6 ↗
31. More efficient design of reduced beam sections (RBS) for maximum seismic performance10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.106728 ↗
32. Post-earthquake Behavior of Steel Moment Resisting Frames with Connections Modified by Introducing Reduced Beam Section (RBS)10.1007/s13296-024-00828-5 ↗
33. Seismic performance of the accordion-web RBS connection10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.09.007 ↗
34. Cyclic testing of tubular web RBS connections in deep beams10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.10.020 ↗
35. Seismic performance of reduced web section moment connections10.1007/s13296-017-6004-x ↗
36. Building retrofit with reduced web (RWS) and beam (RBS) section limited-ductility connections10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107459 ↗
37. Seismic behavior of frames with innovative energy dissipation systems (FUSEIS1-2)10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.01.054 ↗
38. Welded fuses for dissipative beam-to-column connections of composite steel frames: Numerical analyses10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.09.003 ↗
39. Seismic resistant buildings with dissipative elements made of high strength steel [Erdbebensichere Bauten mit dissipativen Elementen aus hochfestem Stahl]10.1002/stab.202200035 ↗
40. Targeted steel frames by means of innovative moment resisting connections10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.106695 ↗
41. Prevention of brittle failure for steel connections utilizing special devices10.1016/j.istruc.2024.106153 ↗
42. Benfratello, S., Palizzolo, L., and Vazzano, S. (2022). A New Design Problem in the Formulation of a Special Moment Resisting Connection Device for Preventing Local Buckling. J. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12010202 ↗
43. European Committee for Standardization (2006). EN 1993-1-8:2006, European Committee for Standardization. Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures Part 1–8: Design of Joints.
44. Resistance of steel cross-sections subjected to bending, shear and axial forces10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.02.016 ↗