journal article·2024-09-06Open access

Authenticated Multicast in Tiny Networks via an Extremely Low-Bandwidth Medium

Mirosław Kutyłowski, Adrian Cinal, Przemysław Kubiak, Denys Korniienko

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 17

Abstract

We consider authenticating multicast messages in the case of extremely narrow communication channels, such as underwater acoustic communication, with devices such as mobile sensors creating a self-organizing autonomous network. Channel characteristics in this scenario prevent the application of digital signatures (and asymmetric cryptography in general), as it would consume too much of the available bandwidth. As communication is relatively sparse, standard symmetric methods such as TESLA have limited application in this scenario as well. Driven by real-world requirements, we focus on tiny networks of only a few nodes. This paper discusses two issues: (a) strategies of key predistribution enabling flexible creation of multicast groups; (b) authenticating multicast messages in a way that prevents an attacker impersonating the sender by subverting one or more receiver nodes and learning the symmetric keys stored by these nodes. For tiny networks, we show that scalable and asymptotically efficient solutions might be useless, and that specially tailored combinatorial approaches may confer some advantage.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Authentication Protocols Security · Security in Wireless Sensor Networks · Opportunistic and Delay-Tolerant Networks

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

NASK National Research Institute, Kolska 12, 01-045 Warsaw, Poland

Faculty of Computer Science and Telecommunication, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Communications underwater
2. Double the data rate in underwater acoustic communication using OFDM based on subcarrier power modulation10.1007/s00773-024-00989-2 ↗
3. Shallow Water Experiment of OFDM Underwater Acoustic Communications
4. In-depth energy analysis of security algorithms and protocols for the Internet of Things10.1007/s13389-021-00274-7 ↗
5. Silva, B.L.M.T., Sousa, F.S., Santos, G.G., Santos, D.F.S., Morais, M.R.A., and Perkusich, A. (2022, January 7–9). A Low-Power Cryptographic Coprocessor Design for the Internet of Things. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE), Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/ICCE53296.2022.9730198 ↗
6. El-Hadedy, M., Guo, X., Yoshii, K., Cai, Y., Herndon, R., Banta, B., and Hwu, W.M. (2023). RECO-ASCON: Reconfigurable ASCON hash functions for IoT applications. Integr. VLSI J., 93.10.1016/j.vlsi.2023.102061 ↗
7. Pearson, B., Zou, C.C., Zhang, Y., Ling, Z., and Fu, X. (2020, January 2–4). SIC2: Securing Microcontroller Based IoT Devices with Low-cost Crypto Coprocessors. Proceedings of the 26th IEEE International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems, ICPADS 2020, Hong Kong.10.1109/ICPADS51040.2020.00057 ↗
8. Energy Consumption in Relay Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks for NDN10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2907693 ↗
9. Sehgal, A., David, C., and Schönwälder, J. (2011, January 19–22). Energy consumption analysis of underwater acoustic sensor networks. Proceedings of the OCEANS’11 MTS/IEEE KONA, Waikoloa, HI, USA.10.23919/OCEANS.2011.6107287 ↗
10. Ascon v1.2: Lightweight Authenticated Encryption and Hashing10.1007/s00145-021-09398-9 ↗
11. Securing Underwater Sensor Networks Against Routing Attacks10.1007/s11277-017-4313-1 ↗
12. Perrig, A., Canetti, R., Song, D.X., and Tygar, J.D. (2001, January 8–9). Efficient and Secure Source Authentication for Multicast. Proceedings of the Network and Distributed System Security Symposium, NDSS 2001, San Diego, CA, USA.
13. Combinatorische Aufgabe
15. The TESLA Broadcast Authentication Protocol
16. Baugher, M., and Carrara, E. (2006). The Use of Timed Efficient Stream Loss-Tolerant Authentication (TESLA) in the Secure Real-Time Transport Protocol (SRTP), RFC 4383; Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF).10.17487/rfc4383 ↗
17. Password Authentification with Insecure Communication10.1145/358790.358797 ↗
18. Cooperative Authentication in Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks10.1109/TWC.2018.2886896 ↗
19. NATO Standardization Office (NSO) (2024). NATO Standard, ANEP-87, NATO. Edition A, Version 2.
20. Authentication of underwater assets10.1016/j.comnet.2024.110191 ↗
21. Ateniese, G., Capossele, A., Gjanci, P., Petrioli, C., and Spaccini, D. (2015, January 18–21). SecFUN: Security framework for underwater acoustic sensor networks. Proceedings of the OCEANS 2015, Genova, Italy.10.1109/OCEANS-Genova.2015.7271735 ↗
22. Souza, E., Wong, H.C., Cunha, Í., Loureiro, A.A.F., Vieira, L.F.M., and Oliveira, L.B. (2013, January 7–10). End-to-end authentication in Under-Water Sensor Networks. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications, ISCC 2013, Split, Croatia.10.1109/ISCC.2013.6754963 ↗
23. Banerjee, U., and Chandrakasan, A.P. (2022). A Low-Power BLS12-381 Pairing Crypto-Processor for Internet-of-Things Security Applications. arXiv.10.1109/LSSC.2021.3124074 ↗
24. The Tower Number Field Sieve
25. Kumar, M., and Chand, S. (2022). Pairing-Friendly Elliptic Curves: Revisited Taxonomy, Attacks and Security Concern. arXiv.
26. Casari, P., Diamant, R., Tomasin, S., Neasham, J., and Lampe, L. (2024, September 01). Practical Security for Underwater Acoustic Networks: Published Results from the SAFE-UComm Project. Forum Acusticum, Available online: https://dael.euracoustics.org/confs/fa2023/data/articles/000615.pdf.10.61782/fa.2023.0615 ↗
27. Casari, P., Ardizzon, F., and Tomasin, S. (2022, January 14–16). Physical Layer Authentication in Underwater Acoustic Networks with Mobile Devices. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Underwater Networks & Systems, WUWNet ’22, Boston, MA, USA.10.1145/3567600.3567604 ↗
28. Canetti, R., Garay, J.A., Itkis, G., Micciancio, D., Naor, M., and Pinkas, B. (1999, January 21–25). Multicast Security: A Taxonomy and Some Efficient Constructions. Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM ’99, The Conference on Computer Communications, Eighteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, the Future Is Now, New York, NY, USA.10.1109/INFCOM.1999.751457 ↗
29. A taxonomy of multicast data origin authentication: Issues and solutions10.1109/COMST.2004.5342292 ↗
30. LoRaWAN Network: Radio Propagation Models and Performance Evaluation in Various Environments in Lebanon10.1109/JIOT.2019.2906838 ↗
31. Range and Capacity of LoRa 2.4 GHz