journal article·2024-08-27Open access

Site-Specific Spectra for the City of Mexicali, Mexico, Obtained from April 2010 Earthquake Records

Héctor E. Rodríguez Lozoya, Tonatiuh Domínguez Reyes, Armando Aguilar-Meléndez, Manuel Edwiges Trejo Soto, Alejandro García-Elías, Jesús Huerta-Chua

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 17

Abstract

The April 2010 earthquake (Mw = 7.2), which occurred about 40 km to the southeast of the city of Mexicali, Mexico, caused significant damage to buildings. To improve knowledge of the seismic response of the soil due to the occurrence of earthquakes, a response spectrum at 5% damping was calculated. A comparison between the spectral ordinates obtained in this study and the spectra proposed by the regulations of the Federal Electricity Commission (CFE for its acronym in Spanish) in its seismic design for civil works manual, which is currently used as the design standard throughout the country, was made. We calculated response spectra using records from the April 2010 earthquake and a stratigraphic profile of the city to calculate a transfer function. We first corrected the records for site effect due to stations being over sedimentary soil, and then used them as Green functions to perform a numerical simulation of propagation through the stratigraphic profile to obtain a simulated surface record from which response spectra were calculated. Additionally, ambient seismic noise was measured at the same site to get the dominant period (To). We observed that the transfer function was similar to the spectral quotient up to 5 Hz and that To calculated in both ways gave similar values. The comparison suggests that the design spectrum of the CFE regulation can be considered as a representative spectrum for Mexicali for periods greater than 1.3 s, but not for the zone of short periods.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Seismic Waves and Analysis · Seismic Performance and Analysis · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Facultad de Ingeniería Civil, Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, Ciudad Universitaria, Culiacán 80000, Sinaloa, Mexico

Centro Universitario de Estudios Vulcanológicos, Universidad de Colima, Av. Universidad 333, Las Víboras, Colima 28040, Colima, Mexico

Facultad de Ingeniería Civil, Universidad Veracruzana, Prolongación Av. Venustiano Carranza S/N, Revolución, Poza Rica 93390, Veracruz, Mexico

Facultad de Ciencias de la Tierra, Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, Ciudad Universitaria, Culiacán 80000, Sinaloa, Mexico

Instituto Tecnológico Superior de Poza Rica, Tecnológico Nacional de México, Luis Donaldo Colosio Murrieta S/N, Arroyo del Maíz, Poza Rica 93230, Veracruz, Mexico

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. The 2024 Noto Peninsula Earthquake: Preliminary Observations and Lessons to be Learned10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104611 ↗
2. Building Damage Mapping of the 2024 Noto Peninsula Earthquake, Japan, Using Semi-Supervised Learning and VHR Optical Imagery10.1109/LGRS.2024.3407725 ↗
3. Mizuno, C., Wang, X., and Dang, J. (2024). A fast survey report about bridge damages by the 2024 Noto Peninsula Earthquake. Earthq. Res. Adv., 100312.10.1016/j.eqrea.2024.100312 ↗
4. Field reconnaissance and observations from the February 6, 2023, Turkey earthquake sequence10.1007/s11069-023-06143-2 ↗
5. Preliminary investigation of building damage in Hatay under February 6, 2023 Turkey earthquakes10.1007/s11803-023-2201-0 ↗
6. Effects of the February 6, 2023, Kahramanmaraş earthquake on structures in Kahramanmaraş city10.1007/s11069-023-06314-1 ↗
7. Geotechnical damage survey report on February 6, 2023 Turkey-Syria Earthquake, Turkey10.1016/j.sandf.2024.101463 ↗
8. Reconnaissance report on damage caused by the February 6, 2023, Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes in reinforced-concrete structures10.1016/j.jobe.2024.109200 ↗
9. Deadly intraslab Mexico earthquake of 19 September 2017 (Mw =7.1): Ground motion and damage pattern in Mexico City10.1785/0220180159 ↗
10. Reconnaissance of the 2017 Puebla, Mexico earthquake10.1016/j.sandf.2018.06.007 ↗
11. The September 7, 2017 Tehuantepec, Mexico, earthquake: Damage assessment in masonry structures for housing10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102123 ↗
12. Ground motions from the 7 and 19 September 2017 Tehuantepec and Puebla-Morelos, Mexico, earthquakes
13. Meneses, J., Stewart, J., Anderson, R., Angel, J., Callister, J., Creveling, M., Edwards, C., Everingham, L., Garcia-Delgado, V., and Gastelum, A. (2010). The Mw 7.2 El Mayor Cucapah (Baja California) Earthquake of April 4, 2010, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
14. Shing, B., Stavridis, A., Murcia-Delso, J., Mosele, F., Koutromanos, I., Okail, H., and Guerrini, G. (2010). Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Reconnaissance Report on Mexicali, EERI.
15. NTC-DS (2017). Norma Técnica Complementaria Para Diseño por Sismo, Gaceta Oficial del Distrito Federal.
16. NTC-DSC (2020). Norma Técnica Complementaria Para Diseño por Sismo con Comentarios, Gaceta Oficial de la Ciudad de México.
17. NTC-DS (2023). Norma Técnica Complementaria Para el Diseño por Sismo, Gaceta Oficial de la Ciudad México.
18. (2015). Manual de Diseño de Obras Civiles, Diseño Por Sismo, CFE. [2015th ed.].
19. Gonzalez, A., and Calderon, J. (2022). An overview of the seismic elastic response spectra and their application according to Mexican, USA, and international building codes. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12073472 ↗
20. (2018). Diseño Sismoresistente (Standard No. Norma de E-030).
21. Norma NEC-SE-DS de construcción (2015). Ministerio de Desarrollo Urbano y Vivienda, Dirección de Comunicación Social.
22. Alpyürür, M., and Ulutaş, H. (2024). Comparison of performance analysis results with developed site-specific response spectra and Turkish seismic design code: A case study from the SW türkiye region. Buildings, 14.10.3390/buildings14051233 ↗
23. The 2010 Mw 7.2 El Mayor-Cucapah Earthquake Sequence, Baja California, Mexico and Southernmost California, USA: Active Seismotectonics along the Mexican Pacific Margin10.1007/s00024-010-0209-7 ↗
24. Late quaternary activity of the Laguna Salada fault in northern Baja California, Mexico10.1130/0016-7606(1995)107<0008:LQAOTL>2.3.CO;2 ↗
25. Stratigraphy and structure of the Altar basin of NW Sonora: Implications for the history of the Colorado River delta and the Salton Trough
26. Shape and dimensions of the Cerro Prieto pull-apart basin, Mexicali, Baja California, Mexico, based on the regional seismic record and surface structures10.2747/0020-6814.50.7.636 ↗
27. Imai, T. (1977, January 10–15). P-and S-wave velocities of the ground in Japan. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Tokyo, Japan.
28. Estimation of S-wave velocity in terms of characteristic indices of soil
29. A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface
30. Geopsy: A user-friendly open-source tool set for ambient vibration processing10.1785/0220190360 ↗
31. Transmission of elastic waves through a stratified solid10.1063/1.1699629 ↗
32. The dispersion of surface waves in multilayered media10.1785/BSSA0430010017 ↗
33. Meehan, T. (2018). Evolution of the propagator matrix method and its implementation in seismology. arXiv.
34. Ordaz, M., and Montoya, C. (2000). DEGTRA 2000 (Software), Instituto de Ingeniería UNAM, CENAPRED.
35. (2015). PRODISIS v4.1 (Software), Programa de Diseño Sísmico.
36. Identification of near-fault multi-pulse ground motion10.1016/j.apm.2023.01.002 ↗
37. Seismic damage analysis due to near-fault multipulse ground motion10.1002/eqe.4003 ↗