journal article·2024-08-01Open access

A Model of Information Visualization Interpretation

Michael G. Hilgers

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 15

Abstract

Since the groundbreaking work by Cleveland and McGill in 1984, studies have revealed the difficulties humans have extracting quantitative data from visualizations as simple as bar graphs. As a first step toward understanding this situation, this paper proposes a mathematical model of the interpretation effort of a bar graph using concepts drawn from eye tracking. First, three key areas of interest (AOIs) are identified, and fixations are modeled as random point clouds within the AOIs. Stochastic geometry is introduced via random triangles connecting fixations within the adjacent key visual regions. The so-called landmark methodology provides the basis for the probabilistic analysis of the constructed system. It is found that the random length of interest in a stochastic triangle has a noncentral chi distribution with a known mean. Unique to this model, in terms of previous landmark applications, is the inclusion of a correlation between fixations, which is justified by physiological studies of the eyes. This approach introduces several model parameters, such as the noncentrality parameter, variance of the fixation cloud, correlation between fixations, and a visualization scale. A detailed parametric analysis examining the dependence of the mean on these parameters is conducted. The paper ties this work to the visualization via a definition of the expected visual measurement error. An asymptotic analysis of the visual error is performed, and a simple expression is found to relate the expected visual measurement error to the key model parameters. From this expression, the influence these parameters have on a visualization’s interpretation is considered.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Retinal Imaging and Analysis · Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology · Data Visualization and Analytics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Business and Information Technology Department, Kummer College of Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Economic Development, Missouri University of Science and Technology, 106D Fulton Hall, 301 W. 14th St., Rolla, MO 65409, USA

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. Tufte, E.R. (2001). The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, Graphics Press. [2nd ed.].
2. Visualization Techniques for Large Datasets10.25103/jestr.051.13 ↗
3. Graphical perception: Theory, experimentation, and application to the development of graphical methods10.1080/01621459.1984.10478080 ↗
4. Heer, J., and Bostock, M. (2010, January 10–15). Crowdsourcing graphical perception: Using mechanical turk to assess visualization design. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, GA, USA.10.1145/1753326.1753357 ↗
5. Review of graph comprehension research: Implications for instruction10.1023/A:1013180410169 ↗
6. Visual attention: Bottom-up versus top-down10.1016/j.cub.2004.09.041 ↗
7. Bottom-up and top-down attention are independent10.1167/13.3.16 ↗
8. Matzen, L.E. (2016). Using Eye Tracking Metrics and Visual Saliency Maps to Assess Data Visualizations, Sandia National Lab.(SNL-NM). Technical Report.10.2352/ISSN.2470-1173.2016.16.HVEI-127 ↗
9. Matzen, L.E., Haass, M.J., and McNamara, L.A. (2014). Using Eye Tracking to Assess Cognitive Biases, Sandia National Lab.(SNL-NM). Technical Report.
10. What makes a visualization memorable?10.1109/TVCG.2013.234 ↗
11. Jacob, R.J., and Karn, K.S. (2003). Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research: Ready to deliver the promises. The Mind’s Eye, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-044451020-4/50031-1 ↗
12. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372 ↗
13. Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search10.1080/17470210902816461 ↗
14. Higgins, E., Leinenger, M., and Rayner, K. (2014). Eye movements when viewing advertisements. Front. Psychol., 5.10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00210 ↗
15. Harel, J., Koch, C., and Perona, P. (2006, January 4–7). Graph-based visual saliency. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS’06), Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.7551/mitpress/7503.003.0073 ↗
16. Matzen, L.E., Haass, M.J., Tran, J., and McNamara, L.A. (2016). Using Eye Tracking Metrics and Visual Saliency Maps to Assess Image Utility, Sandia National Lab.(SNL-NM). Technical Report.10.2352/ISSN.2470-1173.2016.16.HVEI-127 ↗
17. Haass, M.J., Matzen, L.E., Butler, K.M., and Armenta, M. (2016, January 4–17). A new method for categorizing scanpaths from eye tracking data. Proceedings of the Ninth Biennial ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications, Charleston, SC, USA.10.1145/2857491.2857503 ↗
18. Binocular co-ordination of human horizontal saccadic eye movements10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017284 ↗
19. Binocular co-ordination of human vertical saccadic eye movements10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017285 ↗
20. Oblique saccadic eye movements: Independence of horizontal and vertical channels10.1001/archopht.1977.04450070156016 ↗
21. Size and shape spaces for landmark data in two dimensions
22. Eye tracking for visualization evaluation: Reading values on linear versus radial graphs10.1177/1473871611406623 ↗
23. Stoyan, D., and Stoyan, H. (1994). Fractals, Random Shapes and Point Fields: Methods of Geometrical Statistics, John Wiley & Sons Incorporated.
24. Distributions involving norms of correlated Gaussian vectors10.1090/qam/99953 ↗
25. Miller, K.S. (1964). Multidimensional Gaussian Distributions, Wiley.
26. Hilgers, M.G., and Burke, A. (2019). Exploring Errors in Reading a Visualization via Eye Tracking Models Using Stochastic Geometry. HCI in Business, Government and Organizations. Information Systems and Analytics, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference, HCIBGO 2019, Held as Part of the 21st HCI International Conference, HCII 2019, Orlando, FL, USA, 26–31 July 2019, Springer. Proceedings, Part II 21.10.1007/978-3-030-22338-0_5 ↗
27. A note on the bivariate chi distribution10.1137/1005034 ↗
28. Moments of the noncentral chi distribution10.1007/s13171-021-00262-3 ↗
29. Moments of the generalized Rayleigh distribution10.1090/qam/119222 ↗
30. Olver, F.W., Lozier, D.W., Boisvert, R.F., and Clark, C.W. (2010). NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions Hardback and CD-ROM, Cambridge University Press.
31. Maximum likelihood estimation in the non-central chi distribution with unknown scale parameter
32. The circular structural model10.1111/j.2517-6161.1981.tb01162.x ↗
33. The statistical analysis of shape data10.1093/biomet/76.2.271 ↗
34. Shape distributions for landmark data10.2307/1427764 ↗
35. Olver, F. (1997). Asymptotics and Special Functions, CRC Press.10.1201/9781439864548 ↗
36. Jahnke, E., and Emde, F. (1945). Tables of Functions with Formulae and Curves, Dover Publications.