Dual-Neighborhood Tabu Search for Computing Stable Extensions in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract argumentation has become one of the important fields of artificial intelligence. This paper proposes a dual-neighborhood tabu search (DNTS) method specifically designed to find a single stable extension in abstract argumentation frameworks. The proposed algorithm implements an improved dual-neighborhood strategy incorporating a fast neighborhood evaluation method. In addition, by introducing techniques such as tabu and perturbation, this algorithm is able to jump out of the local optimum, which significantly improves the performance of the algorithm. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of the method, the performance of the algorithm on more than 300 randomly generated benchmark datasets was studied and compared with the algorithm in the literature. In the experiment, DNTS outperforms the other method regarding time consumption in more than 50 instances and surpasses the other meta-heuristic method in the number of solved cases. Further analysis shows that the initialization method, the tabu strategy, and the perturbation technique help guarantee the efficiency of the proposed DNTS.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation · Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Computer Science, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Key R&D Program of Hubei Provincial Department of Science and Technology
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Besnard, P., and Doutre, S. (2024, March 01). Characterization of Semantics for Argument Systems. Available online: https://cdn.aaai.org/KR/2004/KR04-021.pdf.
2. Amgoud, L., Maudet, N., and Parsons, S. (2000, January 10–12). Modelling dialogues using argumentation. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems, Boston, MA, USA.
3. Laying the foundations for a world wide argument web10.1016/j.artint.2007.04.015 ↗
4. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-X ↗
5. Towards artificial argumentation
6. Foundations of implementations for formal argumentation
7. Methods for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation–a survey10.1016/j.artint.2014.11.008 ↗
8. Complexity-sensitive decision procedures for abstract argumentation10.1016/j.artint.2013.10.001 ↗
9. Niskanen, A., and Järvisalo, M. (2020). Algorithms for dynamic argumentation frameworks: An incremental SAT-based approach. ECAI 2020, IOS Press.
10. Argumentation reasoning via circumscription with Pyglaf10.3233/FI-2019-1808 ↗
11. A logical account of formal argumentation10.1007/s11225-009-9218-x ↗
12. Pollock, J.L. (1995). Cognitive Carpentry A Blueprint for How to Build a Person, MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/1887.001.0001 ↗
13. Vreeswijk, G. (2006, January 11–12). An algorithm to compute minimally grounded and admissible defence sets in argument systems. Proceedings of the COMMA, Liverpool, UK.
14. Verheij, B. (2007, January 6–12). A Labeling Approach to the Computation of Credulous Acceptance in Argumentation. Proceedings of the IJCAI, Citeseer, Hyderabad, India.
15. Doutre, S., and Mengin, J. (2001, January 18–22). Preferred extensions of argumentation frameworks: Query, answering, and computation. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Automated Reasoning, Siena, Italy.10.1007/3-540-45744-5_20 ↗
16. New stochastic local search approaches for computing preferred extensions of abstract argumentation10.3233/AIC-180769 ↗
17. Thimm, M. (2018, January 12–14). Stochastic Local Search Algorithms for Abstract Argumentation Under Stable Semantics. Proceedings of the COMMA, Warsaw, Poland.
18. Sparse weighted canonical correlation analysis10.1049/cje.2017.08.004 ↗
19. Generating hard satisfiability problems10.1016/0004-3702(95)00045-3 ↗
20. Local search strategies for satisfiability testing10.1090/dimacs/026/25 ↗
21. The reactive tabu search10.1287/ijoc.6.2.126 ↗
22. A study of diversification strategies for the quadratic assignment problem10.1016/0305-0548(94)90018-3 ↗
23. Glover, F., and Laguna, M. (1998). Tabu Search, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4615-6089-0 ↗
24. An introduction to argumentation semantics10.1017/S0269888911000166 ↗
25. Fichte, J.K., Hecher, M., Gorczyca, P., and Dewoprabowo, R. (2024, April 01). A-Folio DPDB—System Description for ICCMA 2021. Available online: https://argumentationcompetition.org/2021/downloads/a-folio-dpdb.pdf.