Layer Contour Geometric Characterization in MEX/P through CIS-Based Adaptive Edge Detection
Source abstract
Abstract
The industrial adoption of material extrusion of polymers (MEX/P) is hindered by the geometric quality of manufactured parts. Contact image sensors (CISs), commonly used in flatbed scanners, have been proposed as a suitable technology for layer-wise characterization of contour deviations, paving the way for the application of corrective measures. Nevertheless, despite the high resolution of CIS digital images, the accurate characterization of layer contours in MEX/P is affected by contrast patterns between the layer and the background. Conventional edge-recognition algorithms struggle to comprehensively characterize layer contours, thereby diminishing the reliability of deviation measurements. In this work, we introduce a novel approach to precisely locate contour points in the context of MEX/P based on evaluating the similarity between the grayscale pattern near a particular tentative contour point and a previously defined gradient reference pattern. Initially, contrast patterns corresponding to various contour orientations and layer-to-background distances are captured. Subsequently, contour points are identified and located in the images, with coordinate measuring machine (CMM) verification serving as a ground truth. This information is then utilized by an adaptive edge-detection algorithm (AEDA) designed to identify boundaries in manufactured layers. The proposed method has been evaluated on test targets produced through MEX/P. The results indicate that the average deviation of point position compared to that achievable with a CMM in a metrology laboratory ranges from 8.02 µm to 13.11 µm within the experimental limits. This is a substantial improvement in the reliability of contour reconstruction when compared to previous research, and it could be crucial for implementing routines for the automated detection and correction of geometric deviations in AM parts.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection · Image and Object Detection Techniques · Optical measurement and interference techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Construction and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Oviedo, 33394 Asturias, Spain
Funding
Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities and by FEDER
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Kalpakjian, S., and Schmid, S. (2013). Manufacturing, Engineering and Technology, Pearson. [7th ed.].
2. Groover, M.P. (2019). Fundamentals of Modern Manufacturing: Materials, Processes, and Systems, Wiley. [7th ed.].
3. Black, J.T., and Kosher, R.A. (2012). DeGarmo’s Materials and Processes in Manufacturing, Wiley. [11th ed.].
4. (2021). Additive Manufacturing—General Principles—Fundamentals and Vocabulary (Standard No. ISO/ASTM 52900:2021).
5. Wohlers, T. (2021). Wholers Report 2021—Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing State of the Industry, Wholers Associates. Annual Worldwide Progress Report.
6. The Barriers to the Progression of Additive Manufacture: Perspectives from UK Industry10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.02.003 ↗
7. Adoption of additive manufacturing technology: Drivers, barriers and impacts on upstream supply chain design10.1108/IJPDLM-12-2021-0541 ↗
8. On the Application of Grey Taguchi Method for Benchmarking the Dimensional Accuracy of the PLA Fused Filament Fabrication Process
9. Park, K., Kim, G., No, H., Jeom, H.W., and Kremer, G.E.O. (2020). Identification of Optimal Process Parameter Settings Based on Manufacturing Performance for Fused Filament Fabrication of CFR-PEEK. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10134630 ↗
10. The Effect of Six Key Process Control Parameters on the Surface Roughness, Dimensional Accuracy, and Porosity in Material Extrusion 3D Printing of Polylactic Acid: Prediction Models and Optimization Supported by Robust Design Analysis
11. Distortion Prediction and NURBS Based Geometry Compensation for Reducing Part Errors in Additive Manufacturing10.1016/j.promfg.2020.05.103 ↗
12. In-Plane Shape-Deviation Modeling and Compensation for Fused Deposition Modeling Processes10.1109/TASE.2016.2544941 ↗
13. A Layerwise Geometric Error Compensation Procedure for Additive Manufacturing10.1108/RPJ-04-2023-0144 ↗
14. Comparing Geometric Tolerance Capabilities of Additive Manufacturing Systems for Polymers
15. Dimensional and Geometrical Deviations of an Assembly with a Lattice Structure Manufactured by a Material Extrusion Process: Numerical and Experimental Results10.1007/s00170-023-11579-8 ↗
16. Study of the Industrial Potential of Markforged X7 3D Printer10.1051/meca/2024003 ↗
17. Process monitoring for material extrusion additive manufacturing: A state-of-the-art review10.1007/s40964-021-00192-4 ↗
18. Armstrong, A.A., Norato, J., Alleyne, A.G., and Wagoner Johnson, A.J. (2019). Direct process feedback in extrusion-based 3D bioprinting. Biofabrication, 12.10.1088/1758-5090/ab4d97 ↗
19. Monitoring temperature in additive manufacturing with physics-based compressive sensing10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.05.010 ↗
20. Statistical process monitoring in a specified period for the image data of fused deposition modeling parts with consistent layers10.1007/s10845-020-01628-4 ↗
21. A Deep Learning Solution for Real-Time Quality Assessment and Control in Additive Manufacturing Using Point Cloud Data10.1007/s10845-023-02121-4 ↗
22. Determination of Quality Classes for Material Extrusion Additive Manufacturing Using Image Processing10.1007/s00170-024-13269-5 ↗
23. Making 3D Replicas Using a Flatbed Scanner and a 3D Printer10.1007/978-3-319-09153-2_6 ↗
24. Determination of the Size Distribution and Percentage of Broken Kernels of Rice Using Flatbed Scanning and Image Analysis10.1016/j.foodres.2003.09.001 ↗
25. A High-Resolution and Large Field-of-View Scanner for in-Line Characterization of Powder Bed Defects during Additive Manufacturing10.1016/j.matdes.2018.107562 ↗
26. A Model to Transform a Commercial Flatbed Scanner into a Two-Coordinates Measuring Machine10.1016/j.measurement.2015.05.029 ↗
27. Development of an Error Compensation Case Study for 3D Printers10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.145 ↗
28. Blanco, D., Fernandez, P., Noriega, A., Alvarez, B.J., and Valiño, G. (2019). Layer Contour Verification in Additive Manufacturing by Means of Commercial Flatbed Scanners. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20010001 ↗
29. Blanco, D., Fernández, P., Fernández, A., Alvarez, B.J., and Rico, J.C. (2020). The Influence of Image Processing and Layer-to-Background Contrast on the Reliability of Flatbed Scanner-Based Characterisation of Additively Manufactured Layer Contours. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11010178 ↗
30. Layer Contour Characterization in Additive Manufacturing through Image Binarization10.1088/1757-899X/1193/1/012067 ↗
31. A Procedure to Integrate a CIS Sensor in an Additive Manufacturing Machine for In-Situ Digitizing of Deposited Material Layers10.1109/TMECH.2021.3121077 ↗
32. On-Machine CIS SoC-Based Layerwise Inspection System for MEX Additive Manufacturing10.4028/p-P0iYcB ↗
33. Roberts, L.G. (1963). Machine Perception of Three-Dimensional Solids. [Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology].
34. Duda, R., and Hart, P. (1973). Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis, John Wiley & Sons Inc.
35. Lipkin, B.S., and Rosenfeld, A. (1970). Object enhancement and extraction. Picture Processing and Psychopictorics, Academic Press.
36. A Computational Approach to Edge Detection10.1109/TPAMI.1986.4767851 ↗
37. Edge and line oriented Contour detection: State of the art10.1016/j.imavis.2010.08.009 ↗
38. Malbog, M.A.F., Lacatan, L.L., Dellosa, R.M., Austria, Y.D., and Cunanan, C.F. (2020, January 8). Edge Detection Comparison of Hybrid Feature Extraction for Combustible Fire Segmentation: A Canny vs. Sobel Performance Analysis. Proceedings of the 2020 11th IEEE Control and System Graduate Research Colloquium (ICSGRC), Shah Alam, Malaysia.10.1109/ICSGRC49013.2020.9232632 ↗
39. Canny Edge Detection Model in MRI Image Segmentation Using Optimized Parameter Tuning Method10.32604/iasc.2020.012069 ↗
40. Zhou, Z., and Zhang, J. (2007, January 18–20). Object Detection and Tracking Based on Adaptive Canny Operator and GM(1,1) Model. Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Conference on Grey Systems and Intelligent Services, Nanjing, China.
41. Ali, M., and Clausi, D. (2001, January 9–13). Using the Canny Edge Detector for Feature Extraction and Enhancement of Remote Sensing Images. Proceedings of the IGARSS 2001: Scanning the Present and Resolving the Future, Proceedings, IEEE 2001 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Cat. No.01CH37217.
42. In-Situ Contour Detection for Additive Manufactured Workpieces10.1016/j.procir.2018.08.051 ↗
43. Investigation of the Dimensional Accuracy Using Image Processing Techniques in Powder Bed Fusion10.1177/09544089211011011 ↗
44. Aminzadeh, M., and Kurfess, T. (July, January 27). Vision-Based Inspection System for Dimensional Accuracy in Powder-Bed Additive Manufacturing. Proceedings of the ASME 2016 11th International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference, Blacksburg, VA, USA. Proceedings of the Volume 2: Materials; Biomanufacturing; Properties, Applications and Systems; Sustainable Manufacturing.10.1115/MSEC2016-8674 ↗
45. Methods and Procedure of Referenced in Situ Control of Lateral Contour Displacements in Additive Manufacturing10.5194/jsss-10-219-2021 ↗
46. Computer Vision Based Quality Control for Additive Manufacturing Parts10.1007/s00170-022-10683-5 ↗
47. (2009). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Acceptance and Reverification Tests for Coordinate Measuring Machines (CMM): Part 2: CMMs Used for Measuring Linear dimensions (Standard No. ISO 10360-2:2009).
48. Comparative Study of Hough Transform Methods for Circle Finding10.1016/0262-8856(90)90059-E ↗