Prototype Network for Few-Shot Hazard Assessment of Vehicle Lane Changes in Risk Field
Source abstract
Abstract
It is well known that road traffic safety is one of the crucial topics in the field of automotive safety in assisted driving. In the face of complex traffic scenarios, there are still a large number of unsolved problems in the identification of vehicle risk levels. Given the difficulty of obtaining sufficient data for model training in many vehicle risk scenarios, it is important to correctly identify the vehicle risk posed through few-shot testing. The main idea of this method is to learn the class prototype of each risk state of a vehicle through encoding and mapping the vehicle’s characteristic parameters in the risk field and identifying the risk posed by few-shot vehicle lane changes through the application of the training of a prototype network. The latest results improve the efficiency of identifying risk in few-shot lane changes, which can provide practical guidance for risk identification and decision analysis in safe lane-change trigger scenarios based on the expected functional safety and provide theoretical support for the development of L3+ autonomous vehicles.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety · Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications · Software Reliability and Analysis Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin 300222, China
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Polychronopoulos, A., Amditis, A., Scheunert, U., Scheunert, U., and Tatschke, T. (2006, January 10–13). Revisiting JDL model for automotive safety applications: The PF2 functional model. Proceedings of the 2006 9th International Conference on Information Fusion, Florence, Italy.10.1109/ICIF.2006.301681 ↗
2. Rendon-Velez, E., Horváth, I., and Opiyo, E.Z. (2009, January 21–25). Progress with situation assessment and risk prediction in advanced driver assistance systems: A survey. Proceedings of the 16th ITS World Congress, Stockholm, Sweeden.
3. Error analysis and performance evaluation of a future-trajectory-based cooperative collision warning system10.1109/TITS.2008.2006782 ↗
4. Katrakazas, C., Quddus, M., and Chen, W.H. (2017). A New Methodology for Collision Risk Assessment of Autonomous Vehicles. [Ph.D. Thesis, Longhborough University].
5. Collision risk assessment algorithm via lane-based probabilistic motion prediction of surrounding vehicles10.1109/TITS.2017.2768318 ↗
6. Occlusion-aware risk assessment for autonomous driving in urban environments10.1109/LRA.2019.2900453 ↗
7. A new integrated collision risk assessment methodology for autonomous vehicles10.1016/j.aap.2019.01.029 ↗
8. Key feature selection and risk prediction for lane-changing behaviors based on vehicles’ trajectory data10.1016/j.aap.2019.05.017 ↗
9. A functional style learning approach based on XGBoost for driving assessment and risk prediction10.1016/j.aap.2019.05.005 ↗
10. Shi, X. (2019). Accident Risk Assessment and Prediction Using Surrogate Indicators and Machine Learning, Nanyang Technological University.
11. Gidaris, S., and Komodakis, N. (2018, January 18–22). Dynamic few-shot visual learning without forgetting. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00459 ↗
12. Incremental few-shot learning with attention attractor networks
13. Kang, B., Liu, Z., Wang, X., Yu, F., Feng, J., and Darrell, T. (November, January 27). Few-shot object detection via feature reweighting. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Visions, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
14. Perez-Rua, J.M., Zhu, X., Hospedales, T.M., and Xiang, T. (2020, January 14–19). Incremental few-shot object detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Virtual.10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.01386 ↗
15. Guo, J., Zhu, X., Zhao, C., Cao, D., Lei, Z., and Li, S.Z. (2020, January 14–19). Learning meta face recognition in unseen domains. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Virtual.10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00620 ↗
16. Nguyen, B.D., Do, T.T., Nguyen, B.X., Do, T., Tjiputra, E., and Tran, Q.D. (2019). Overcoming data limitation in medical visual question answering. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2019: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference, Shenzhen, China, 13–17 October 2019, Springer International Publishing. Proceedings, Part IV 22.
17. Wang, T.C., Liu, M.Y., Tao, A., Liu, G., Kautz, J., and Catanzaro, B. (2019, January 8–14). Few-shot video-to-video synthesis. Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
18. Multi-Function Radar Working Mode Recognition with Few Samples Based on Knowledge Embedded Prototype Network
19. Metric-based meta-learning model for few-shot fault diagnosis under multiple limited data conditions10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107510 ↗
20. Driver Intention Recognition Method Using Continuous Hidden Markov Model
21. Intention recognition and trajectory prediction for vehicles using LSTM network
22. Driver Lane Change Intention Recognition Based on Visual Characteristics
23. Global security using human face understanding under vision ubiquitous architecture system
24. Dense RGB-D map-based human tracking and activity recognition using skin joints features and self-organizing map
25. Modeling and analysis of lateral driver behavior in lane-changing execution10.3141/2490-14 ↗
26. Modeling acceleration decisions for freeway merges10.3141/2124-05 ↗
27. Han, Z. (2011). A Microscopic Lane-Changing Model for Driver-Vehicle Agent. [Master’s Thesis, University of Science and Technology of China].
28. A novel lane change decision-making model of autonomous vehicle based on support vector machine10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2900416 ↗
29. Microscopic Characteristics Analysis of Lane Changing Behavior Based on NGSIM Trajectory Data
30. Hayward, J.C. (1972). Near Miss Determination through Use of a Scale of Danger, The Pennsylvania State University.
31. Olsen, E.C.B. (2003). Modeling Slow Lead Vehicle Lane Changing. [Ph.D. Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University].
32. Extended time-to-collision measures for road traffic safety assessment10.1016/S0001-4575(00)00019-1 ↗
33. Ma, Y., Qi, S., Zhang, Y., Lian, G., Lu, W., and Chan, C.Y. (2020). Drivers’ Visual Attention Characteristics under Different Cognitive Workloads: An On-Road Driving Behavior Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17.10.3390/ijerph17155366 ↗
34. Test and evaluation of AEB system based on different overlap-rate collision and different light scenario
35. Optimization and Simulation of Portable Crane’s Arm System Based on MATLAB10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.479-481.1955 ↗
36. Speed and time headway distribution under mixed traffic condition
37. Neale, V., Klauer, S.G., Guo, F., and Ramsey, D.J. (2008). Naturalistic Driving Study: Phase 2, Virginia Tech Transportation Institute (VTTI). Final Report of ITS Center Project.
38. Khatib, O. (1985, January 25–28). Real-time obstacle avoidance system for manipulators and mobile robots. Proceedings of the 1985 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, St. Louis, MO, USA.
39. Mobile robot path planning using membrane evolutionary artificial potential field10.1016/j.asoc.2019.01.036 ↗
40. Path planning of humanoids based on artificial potential field method in unknown environments10.1111/exsy.12360 ↗
41. An advanced potential field method proposed for mobile robot path planning10.1177/0142331218824393 ↗
42. The driving safety field based on driver–vehicle–road interactions10.1109/TITS.2015.2401837 ↗
43. Driving safety field theory modeling and its application in pre-collision warning system10.1016/j.trc.2016.10.003 ↗
44. Prototypical networks for few-shot learning
45. Matching networks for one shot learning
46. Sung, F., Yang, Y., Zhang, L., Xiang, T., Torr, P.H.S., and Hospedales, T.M. (2018, January 18–22). Learning to comapare: Relation network for few-shot learning. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2018.00131 ↗