Comparison between the Dynamic Responses of Steel Buildings with Medium and Deep Columns under Several Seismic Intensities
Source abstract
Abstract
Structural engineers often use deep columns in high seismic areas to reduce drifts, yet this somehow contradicts what is stated in some tests in the sense that even though deep columns may satisfy current seismic provisions, they can suffer premature twisting; this is an indication that a lot of research is needed in this area. Numerical and experimental studies have been conducted to estimate the response of steel buildings with medium and deep columns under the action of static and cyclic loading; however, studies accounting for the dynamic characteristics of buildings and strong motions are not common. In addition, responses in terms of local parameters have not been considered either. In this study, the nonlinear seismic responses of steel buildings with perimeter moment-resisting frames and medium (W14) columns are numerically calculated and compared to those of similar steel buildings with equivalent deep columns in terms of cost (W27 and larger). Low-, mid-, and high-rise steel building models with different dynamic characteristics, as well as several strong motions with different frequency contents, are considered. Results indicate that the drifts of the models with medium columns may be up to 140% greater than those of the models with deep columns. Significant reductions are also observed for top displacements, normalized interstory shears, and combined normalized axial loads and bending moments. Hence, the seismic demands of the buildings with deep columns may be much smaller than those of the buildings with medium columns and, therefore, the buildings with deep columns exhibit a superior behavior, which results in more economical designs. The reduction is greater for the case of low- and mid-rise buildings than for high-rise buildings. One of the reasons for this is that as medium columns are replaced by deep columns, the stiffness and the strength increase, which are lower in the tallest model.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Seismic Performance and Analysis · Seismic and Structural Analysis of Tall Buildings · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Engineering, Autonomous University of Sinaloa, Ciudad Universitaria, Culiacán 80000, Mexico
Funding
National Council of Science and Technology (CONACyT) · Autonomous University of Sinaloa
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Behavior of Ductile SMRFs at Various Seismic Hazard Levels10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:1(98) ↗
2. Performance Evaluation of New Steel Frame Buildings for Seismic Loads10.1002/eqe.147 ↗
3. Modeling of Steel Moment Frames for Seismic Loads10.1016/S0143-974X(01)00078-5 ↗
4. Seismic Behavior of Perimeter and Spatial Steel Frames10.1080/13632460409350497 ↗
5. A Method for Determining the Behaviour Factor of Moment-Resisting Steel Frames with Semi-Rigid Connections10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.09.006 ↗
6. Seismic Evaluation of Steel Moment Frames Buildings Designed Using Different R-Values10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:9(1461) ↗
7. Performance of Two 18-Storey Steel Moment-Frame Building in Southern California during Two Large Simulated San Andres Earthquakes10.1193/1.2360698 ↗
8. Use of Stability Coefficients for Evaluating the P–Δ Effect in Regular Steel Moment Resisting Frames10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.12.042 ↗
9. Comparison of Steel Moment Resisting Frame Designed by Elastic Design and Performance Based Plastic Design Method Based on the Inelastic Response Analysis
10. Displacement-Based Conception of Moment-Resisting Frames That House Essential Facilities10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.12.005 ↗
11. Seismic Yield Displacements of Plane Moment Resisting and X-Braced Steel Frames10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.05.002 ↗
12. Robustness Assessment Approaches for Steel Framed Structures under Catastrophic Events10.1016/j.compstruc.2014.09.010 ↗
13. Systems Reliability for 3D Steel Frames Subject to Gravity Loads10.1016/j.istruc.2016.06.002 ↗
14. Ground-Motion Scaling for Seismic Performance Assessment of High-Rise Moment-Resisting Frame Building10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.01.013 ↗
15. Modal Strength Reduction Factors for Seismic Design of Steel Moment Resisting Frames10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.10.071 ↗
16. Three-Dimensional Response of Steel Moment-Resisting Buildings under Seismic Sequences10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.08.050 ↗
17. Collapse Response and Design of Deep Steel Columns Subjected to Lateral Displacement10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001848 ↗
18. Full-Scale Testing of Deep Wide-Flange Steel Columns under Multiaxis Cyclic Loading: Loading Sequence, Boundary Effects, and Lateral Stability Bracing Force Demands10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001937 ↗
19. Prediction of Seismic Collapse Behavior of Deep Steel Columns Using Machine Learning10.1016/j.istruc.2022.04.021 ↗
20. Collapse Risk of Steel Framed Buildings with Deep Columns under Tri-Directional Excitation10.1016/j.jcsr.2023.108030 ↗
21. Sepulveda, C. (2024). Seismic Behavior of Deep and Slender Steel Columns through Full-Scale Cyclic and Hybrid Testing. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of California San Diego].
22. Gilton, C., Chi, B., and Uang, C. (2000). Cyclic Response of RBS Moment Connections: Weak-Axis Configuration and Deep Column Effects, University of California San Diego.
23. Cyclic Response and Design Recommendations of Reduced Beam Section Moment Connections with Deep Columns10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(464) ↗
24. Shen, J., Astaneh-Asl, A., and McCallen, D. (2002). Use of Deep Columns in Special Steel Moment Frames. Steel Tip Rep.
25. Zhang, X., Ricles, J., LuL, W., and Fisher, J. (2004, January 1–6). Analytical and Experimental Studies on Seismic Behavior of Deep Column-to-Beam Welded Reduced Beam Section Moment Connections. Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Paper No 1599.
26. Shao, D., and Hale, T. (2004, January 25–28). Full Scale Testing and Project Application of Sideplate Moment Connection for SMRF Using Deep Columns. Proceedings of the 2004 SEAOC Convention, Monterey, CA, USA.
27. Ricles, J., and Zhang, X. (2006, January 18–21). Seismic Performance of Reduced Beam Section Moment Connections to Deep Columns. Proceedings of the Structures Congress, St Louis, MI, USA.10.1061/40889(201)47 ↗
28. Experimental Evaluation of Reduced Beam Section Connections to Deep Columns10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:3(346) ↗
29. Seismic Behavior of Reduced Beam Section Moment Connections to Deep Columns10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:3(358) ↗
30. Elkady, A., and Lignos, D. (2013, January 28–30). Collapse Assessment of Steel Moment Resisting Frames Designed with Deep Members. Proceedings of the Vienna Congress on Recent Advances in Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vienna, Austria.
31. Stability of Wide-Flange Columns in Steel Moment-Resisting Frames: Evaluation of the Canadian Seismic Design Requirements10.1007/s10518-021-01313-8 ↗
32. Seismic Reliability of Steel SMFs with Deep Columns Based on PBSD Philosophy10.1016/j.istruc.2022.06.001 ↗
33. Seismic Behaviour of RWS Moment Connections to Deep Columns with European Sections10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.07.009 ↗
34. Carr, A. RUAUMOKO, Inelastic Dynamic Analysis Program 2016.
35. Interaction Equations for Biaxially Loaded Sections10.1061/JSDEAG.0003223 ↗
36. (2023, December 11). Federal Emergency Management Agency. State of the Art Report on Systems Performance of Steel Moment Frames Subjected to Earthquake Ground Shaking. Available online: https://www.atcouncil.org/pdfs/FEMA355Ctoc.pdf.
37. UBC (1997, January 16–19). Structural Engineering Design Provisions, Uniform Building Code. Proceedings of the International Conference of Building Officials, Whittier, CA, USA.
38. (2010). AISC Steel Construction Manual, American Institute of Steel Construction.
39. Seismic Behavior of Moment-Resisting Steel Frames: Analytical Study10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:6(1866) ↗
40. Leon, R.T., and Shin, K.J. (1995, January 2–5). Performance of Semi-Rigid Frames. Proceedings of the Structures XIII Congress, Boston, MA, USA.
41. Dynamic Behavior of Flexible, Semirigid and Rigid Steel Frames10.1016/0143-974X(91)90024-U ↗
42. Implications of Design Philosophies for Seismic Response of Steel Moment Frames10.1002/eqe.4290240110 ↗
43. Seismic Behavior of Moment-Resisting Steel Frames: Experimental Study10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:6(1885) ↗
44. (2010). AISC Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction.