Lower Limb Muscle Co-Activation Maps in Single and Team Lifting at Different Risk Levels
Source abstract
Abstract
The central nervous system uses muscle co-activation for body coordination, effector movement control, and joint stabilization. However, co-activation increases compression and shear stresses on the joints. Lifting activity is one of the leading causes of work-related musculoskeletal problems worldwide, and it has been shown that when the risk level rises, lifting enhances trunk muscle co-activation at the L5/S1 level. This study aims to investigate the co-activation of lower limb muscles during liftings at various risk levels and lifting types (one-person and vs. two-person team lifting), to understand how the central nervous system governs lower limb rigidity during these tasks. The surface electromyographic signal of thirteen healthy volunteers (seven males and six females, age range: 29–48 years) was obtained over the trunk and right lower limb muscles while lifting in the sagittal plane. Then co-activation was computed according to different approaches: global, full leg, flexor, extensor, and rostro-caudal. The statistical analysis revealed a significant increase in the risk level and a decrease in the two-person on the mean and/or maximum of the co-activation in almost all the approaches. Overall, our findings imply that the central nervous system streamlines the motor regulation of lifting by increasing or reducing whole-limb rigidity within a distinct global, extensor, and rostro-caudal co-activation scheme, depending on the risk level/lifting type.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation · Motor Control and Adaptation · Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene, INAIL, Via Fontana Candida, 1, Monte Porzio Catone, 00078 Rome, Italy
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Polo Pontino, Via Franco Faggiana 1668, 04100 Latina, Italy
Funding
European Union’s Horizon 2020 · INAIL
References (62)
Show source-provided references
1. de Kok, J., Vroonhof, P., Snijders, J., Roullis, G., Clarke, M., Peereboom, K., Dorst, P., and van Isusi, I. (2019). Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders: Prevalence, Costs and Demographics in the EU, European Agency for Safety and Health at Work.
2. Govaerts, R., Tassignon, B., Ghillebert, J., Serrien, B., De Bock, S., Ampe, T., El Makrini, I., Vanderborght, B., Meeusen, R., and De Pauw, K. (2021). Prevalence and incidence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in secondary industries of 21st century Europe: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 22.10.1186/s12891-021-04615-9 ↗
3. Criteria for diagnosis and attribution of an occupational musculoskeletal disease
4. Are work-related musculoskeletal disorders claims related to risk factors in workplaces of the manufacturing industry?10.1093/annweh/wxz084 ↗
5. (2023). Guideline for Introducing and Implementing Real-Time Instrumental-Based Tools for Biomechanical Risk Assessment (Standard No. CWA 17938:2023). Available online: https://researchportal.vub.be/en/publications/cwa-17938-guideline-for-introducing-and-implementing-real-time-in.
6. Trunk muscle co-activation and activity in one-and two-person lifting10.1016/j.ergon.2022.103297 ↗
7. Waters, T.R., Putz-Anderson, V., and Garg, A. (1994). Applications Manual for the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation, Department of Health and Human Services.
8. (2014). Ergonomics—Application Document for ISO Standards on Manual Handling (ISO 11228-1, ISO 11228-2 and ISO 11228-3) and Static Working Postures (ISO 11226) (Standard No. ISO/TR 12295).
9. Evaluation of team lifting on work demands, workload and workers’ evaluation: An observational field study10.1016/j.apergo.2014.05.009 ↗
10. Smart collaborative systems for enabling flexible and ergonomic work practices [industry activities]10.1109/MRA.2020.2985344 ↗
11. Ranavolo, A., Ajoudani, A., Cherubini, A., Bianchi, M., Fritzsche, L., Iavicoli, S., Sartori, M., Silvetti, A., Vanderborght, B., and Varrecchia, T. (2020). The sensor-based biomechanical risk assessment at the base of the need for revising of standards for human ergonomics. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20205750 ↗
12. (2021). Ergonomics—Manual Handling—Part 1: Lifting and Carrying (Standard No. ISO 11228-1).
13. Impact of order and load knowledge on trunk kinematics during repeated lifting tasks10.1518/001872007X230181 ↗
14. Local dynamic stability of the lifting kinematic chain10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.06.022 ↗
15. Local dynamic stability of trunk movements during the repetitive lifting of loads10.1016/j.humov.2011.06.009 ↗
16. A Comprehensive Evaluation of Spine Kinematics, Kinetics, and Trunk Muscle Activities During Fatigue-Induced Repetitive Lifting10.1177/0018720820983621 ↗
17. Varrecchia, T., Conforto, S., De Nunzio, A.M., Draicchio, F., Falla, D., and Ranavolo, A. (2022). Trunk Muscle Coactivation in People with and without Low Back Pain during Fatiguing Frequency-Dependent Lifting Activities. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22041417 ↗
18. Ranavolo, A., Draicchio, F., Varrecchia, T., Silvetti, A., and Iavicoli, S. (2018). Wearable monitoring devices for biomechanical risk assessment at work: Current status and future challenges—A systematic review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 15, Erratum in Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 2569.10.3390/ijerph15112569 ↗
19. Spinal loading and lift style in confined vertical space10.1016/j.apergo.2019.103021 ↗
20. Electromyographic Studies of the Lumbar Trunk Musculature during the Generation of Low level Trunk Acceleration10.1002/jor.1100110606 ↗
21. The influence of trunk muscle coactivity on dynamic spinal loads10.1097/00007632-199504150-00006 ↗
22. Surface electromyography for risk assessment in work activities designed using the “revised NIOSH lifting equation”10.1016/j.ergon.2018.06.003 ↗
23. Hwang, S., Kim, Y., and Kim, Y. (2009). Lower extremity joint kinetics and lumbar curvature during squat and stoop lifting. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 10.10.1186/1471-2474-10-15 ↗
24. A passive exoskeleton reduces peak and mean EMG during symmetric and asymmetric lifting10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.05.003 ↗
25. The influence of age on spinal and lower limb muscle activity during repetitive lifting10.1016/j.jelekin.2020.102482 ↗
26. Physical Burden in Manual Patient Handling: Quantification of Lower Limb EMG Muscle Activation Patterns of Healthy Individuals Lifting Different Loads Ergonomically
27. A biomechanical comparison of lifting techniques between subjects with and without chronic low back pain during freestyle lifting and lowering tasks10.1016/S0268-0033(01)00106-1 ↗
28. Evaluation of the age-related changes in movement smoothness in the lower extremity joints during lifting10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.08.239 ↗
29. INAIL (2024, April 08). Italian Worker’s Compensation Authority Annual Report. Available online: https://bancadaticsa.inail.it.
30. Varrecchia, T., De Marchis, C., Draicchio, F., Schmid, M., Conforto, S., and Ranavolo, A. (2020). Lifting activity assessment using kinematic features and neural networks. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10061989 ↗
31. Lifting activity assessment using surface electromyographic features and neural networks10.1016/j.ergon.2018.02.003 ↗
32. Muscle coactivation: Definitions, mechanisms, and functions10.1152/jn.00084.2018 ↗
33. A review of methods to assess coactivation in the spine10.1016/j.jelekin.2016.12.004 ↗
34. Methodologies to assess muscle co-contraction during gait in people with neurological impairment–a systematic literature review10.1016/j.jelekin.2013.11.003 ↗
35. Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks10.1080/00140139308967940 ↗
36. Occupational low back disorder causation and control10.1080/001401300409080 ↗
37. Validation of two 3-D segment models to calculate the net reaction forces and moments at the L5/S1 joint in lifting10.1016/0268-0033(95)00043-7 ↗
38. Patterned control of human locomotion10.1113/jphysiol.2011.215137 ↗
39. Spatiotemporal activation of lumbosacral motoneurons in the locomotor step cycle10.1152/jn.00479.2001 ↗
40. Spinal cord maps of spatiotemporal alpha-motoneuron activation in humans walking at different speeds10.1152/jn.00767.2005 ↗
41. Age-related modifications of muscle synergies and spinal cord activity during locomotion10.1152/jn.00525.2009 ↗
42. Changes in the spinal segmental motor output for stepping during development from infant to adult10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2722-12.2013 ↗
43. Fiori, L., Castiglia, S.F., Chini, G., Draicchio, F., Sacco, F., Serrao, M., Tatarelli, A., Varrecchia, T., and Ranavolo, A. (2024). The Lower Limb Muscle Co-Activation Map during Human Locomotion: From Slow Walking to Running. Bioengineering, 11.10.20944/preprints202401.1593.v1 ↗
44. von Arx, M., Liechti, M., Connolly, L., Bangerter, C., Meier, M.L., and Schmid, S. (2021). From Stoop to Squat: A Comprehensive Analysis of Lumbar Loading among Different Lifting Styles. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 9.10.3389/fbioe.2021.769117 ↗
45. Analysis of squat and stoop dynamic liftings: Muscle forces and internal spinal loads10.1007/s00586-006-0240-7 ↗
46. A Review of Biomechanical Studies on Stoop and Squat Lifting10.1177/154193120004402864 ↗
47. Modular control of limb movements during human locomotion10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2644-07.2007 ↗
48. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion—Part II: Shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.042 ↗
49. Barbero, M., Merletti, R., and Rainoldi, A. (2012). Atlas of Muscle Innervation Zones: Understanding Surface Electromyography and Its Applications, Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/978-88-470-2463-2 ↗
50. Development of Recommendations for SEMG Sensors and Sensor Placement Procedures10.1016/S1050-6411(00)00027-4 ↗
51. Tutorial. Surface EMG Detection, Conditioning and Pre-Processing: Best Practices10.1016/j.jelekin.2020.102440 ↗
52. Tutorial. Surface EMG Detection in Space and Time: Best Practices10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102363 ↗
53. A non-MVC EMG normalization technique for the trunk musculature: Part 1. Method development10.1016/S1050-6411(00)00039-0 ↗
54. How should we normalize electromyograms obtained from healthy participants? What we have learned from over 25 years of research10.1016/j.jelekin.2010.07.004 ↗
55. Kendall, F.P., McCreary, E.K., Provance, P.G., Rodgers, M.M., and Romani, W.A. (2005). Muscles: Testing and Function with Posture and Pain, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
56. Neuromuscular age-related adjustment of gait when moving upwards and downwards10.3389/fnhum.2021.749366 ↗
57. Coordination of two-and one-joint muscles: Functional consequences and implications for motor control10.1123/mcj.4.1.1 ↗
58. The segmental innervation of the lower limb muscles in man: Arris and Gale lecture delivered at the Royal College of Surgeons of England on 2nd January 1964
59. Spine biomechanics10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.03.028 ↗
60. Response of trunk muscle coactivation to changes in spinal stability10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00081-1 ↗
61. Trunk posture and spinal stability10.1016/S0268-0033(01)00064-X ↗
62. Influence of fatigue in neuromuscular control of spinal stability10.1518/hfes.46.1.81.30391 ↗