journal article·2024-05-11Open access

Effect of Jointed Rock Mass on Seismic Response of Metro Station Tunnel-Group Structures

Ruozhou Li, Yong Yuan

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 10

Abstract

A jointed rock mass (JRM) is the usual case in practical engineering, which has significant effects on its mechanical performance. To clarify the difference in the seismic responses of underground structures in JRM sites or homogeneous rock mass (HRM) sites, two models were prepared to take shaking table tests in a structural laboratory. The HRM site was prepared following the similitude relations of material; meanwhile, underground structures of a metro station were embedded during the casting of the models. The JRM site and structure were made with the same material but produced random joints after the natural drying process. Different frequencies of harmonics were used to excite along the two models in the transverse or the longitudinal direction, respectively. The dynamic effect was evaluated by time-frequency and frequency-domain analyses. The test results compared with the HRM model indicated that the JRM model had a 22% reduction in the transverse fundamental frequency, but the dynamic response of the ground surface was enhanced due to the effect of the joints. Under harmonic excitations of the same intensity, the JRM model produced a greater energy response to the station structure and reduced the acceleration response of the platform in the high-frequency region. Meanwhile, the JRM model produced a peak tensile strain at the connections of the main and subsidiary structures that was 31% larger than that of the HRM model, and the range of tensile strains observed at the platform connecting the horizontal passage was 1.5 times larger than that of the HRM model.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis · Rock Mechanics and Modeling

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

State Key Laboratory for Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Assessment of damage in mountain tunnels due to the Taiwan Chi-Chi Earthquake10.1016/S0886-7798(01)00047-5 ↗
2. Investigation and assessment on mountain tunnels and geotechnical damage after the Wenchuan earthquake10.1007/s11431-009-0054-z ↗
3. Seismic damage mechanism and dynamic deformation characteristic analysis of mountain tunnel after Wenchuan earthquake10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.07.017 ↗
4. Seismic damage of mountain tunnels during the 5.12 Wenchuan earthquake10.1007/s11629-016-3878-6 ↗
5. Damage observation and assessment of the Longxi tunnel during the Wenchuan earthquake10.1016/j.tust.2016.02.008 ↗
6. Seismic damage assessment and mechanism analysis of underground powerhouse of the Yingxiuwan Hydropower Station under the Wenchuan earthquake10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.05.027 ↗
7. Control of fault lay-out on seismic design of large underground caverns10.1016/j.tust.2015.07.002 ↗
8. Three-dimensional (3D) dynamic finite element modeling of the effects of a geological fault on the seismic response of underground caverns10.1016/j.tust.2019.103210 ↗
9. Shaking table test on flexible joints of mountain tunnels passing through normal fault10.1016/j.tust.2020.103299 ↗
10. The propagation paths of fluid-driven fractures in layered and faulted rocks10.1017/S0016756822000826 ↗
11. Price, N.J., and Cosgrove, J.W. (1990). Analysis of Geological Structures, Cambridge University Press.
12. Singhal, B.B.S., and Gupta, R.P. (2010). Applied Hydrogeology of Fractured Rocks, Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/978-90-481-8799-7 ↗
13. Prediction of crack density in porous-cracked rocks from elastic wave velocities10.1016/j.jappgeo.2015.02.020 ↗
14. Deere, D. (1988). Rock Classification Systems for Engineering Purposes, ASTM International.
15. Quantitative assessments of the correlations between rock mass rating (RMR) and geological strength index (GSI)10.1016/j.tust.2018.09.015 ↗
16. Use and misuse of rock mass classification systems with particular reference to the Q-system10.1016/j.tust.2005.10.005 ↗
17. Early history of soil–structure interaction10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.11.001 ↗
18. Seismic soil-structure interaction: A state-of-the-art review10.1016/j.istruc.2018.10.009 ↗
19. Dynamic response of segmental lining tunnel10.1520/GTJ20170419 ↗
20. Shaking table tests of transition tunnel connecting TBM and drill-and-blast tunnels10.1016/j.tust.2019.103197 ↗
21. Shaking table tests on fault-crossing tunnels and aseismic effect of grouting10.1016/j.tust.2022.104511 ↗
22. Li, R., Yuan, Y., Zhao, X., Bilotta, E., and Huang, J. (2024). Local Site Effect of Fault Site and Its Impact on Seismic Response of Fault-Crossing Tunnel. J. Earthq. Eng., 1–19.10.1080/13632469.2024.2325025 ↗
23. Ground motion amplification pattern with TBM tunnels crossing soil-rock interface: Shaking table test10.1016/j.undsp.2023.02.009 ↗
24. Local site effect of soil-rock ground: 1-g shaking table test10.1007/s10518-023-01679-x ↗
25. Seismic response of circular tunnels in jointed rock10.1007/s12205-017-1184-7 ↗
26. Numerical modeling of a tunnel in jointed rocks subjected to seismic loading10.1016/j.undsp.2018.11.001 ↗
27. Seismic stability of jointed rock slopes under obliquely incident earthquake waves10.1007/s11803-018-0460-y ↗
28. Ghosh, A., Hsiung, S.M., and Chowdhury, A.H. (1996). Seismic Response of Rock Joints and Jointed Rock Mass: Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analysis, Engineering, Environmental Science, Geology. NUREG/CR-6388 CNRWA 95-013.10.2172/270673 ↗
29. Li, R., and Yuan, Y. (2023). Civil-Comp Conferences, Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering Computing, Pécs, Hungary, 28–31 August 2023, Civil-Comp Press.
30. Multi-point shaking table test of the free field under non-uniform earthquake excitation10.1016/j.sandf.2015.09.031 ↗
31. Stress–strain relationship in elastic stage of fractured rock mass10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105498 ↗
32. A stress–strain relation for jointed rock masses10.1016/S1365-1609(01)00027-2 ↗
33. Evaluation of shear modulus and damping in dynamic centrifuge tests10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:12(1488) ↗
34. Shaking table tests on discrepant responses of shaft-tunnel junction in soft soil under transverse excitations10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.02.013 ↗
35. A benchmark 1 g shaking table test of shallow segmental mini-tunnel in sand10.1007/s10518-020-00909-w ↗
36. The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms10.1109/TAU.1967.1161901 ↗
37. Effect of excitation frequency on segmental tunnels in sand using 1 g shaking table tests10.1016/j.trgeo.2022.100750 ↗