journal article·2019-04

Normal Contact Model for Elastic and Plastic Mechanics of Rough Surfaces

Dong Wang, Zhousuo Zhang, Fan Jin, Xuanhua Fan

Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica· Volume 32· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

An elastic and plastic mechanical model is proposed to characterize the normal contact of rough surfaces. The contact process is considered as three separated contact regimes, i.e., the fully elastic, mixed elastic–plastic and fully plastic ones. The Hertzian elastic contact solutions and the classical fully plastic contact model of Abbott and Firestone are used to model the contact behaviors of fully elastically deformed asperities and fully plastically deformed ones, respectively. For the mixed elastic–plastic regime, an improved Hermit interpolation method is applied to enforce the continuity and smoothness at the critical contact interference, and to decrease the interpolation waving effect by transforming the physical quantities of contact load into logarithmic coordinates. The contact model of rough surfaces is formulated by using the Greenwood and Williamson’s statistics analysis. Comparisons with the CEB, ZMC and KE models are then performed to examine the effects of plasticity index and mean separation. Agreeing well with the ZMC model, our results show that the total contact load of rough surfaces decreases with the increase in mean separation, and the difference between the prediction results of elastic models and the plastic ones also decreases, indicating that the contact behaviors mainly dominated by plastically deformed asperities have been changed to be controlled by elastically deformed ones. Larger plasticity index represents more plastically deformed asperities, inducing normal contact behaviors mainly dominated by plastic solutions.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Tribology and Lubrication Engineering · Gear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Segalman DJ, Gregory DL, Starr MJ, et al. Handbook on dynamics of jointed structures(Tech.Rep. SAND2009-4164). Albuquerque: Sandia National Laboratories; 2009.
2. Ahmadian H, Mottershead JE, James S, Friswell MI, Reece CA. Modelling and updating of large surface-to-surface joints in the AWE-MACE structure. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2006;20:868–80.10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.05.005 ↗
3. Gaul L, Lenz J. Nonlinear dynamics of structures assembled by bolted joints. Acta Mech. 1997;125:169–81.10.1007/BF01177306 ↗
4. Ghaednia H, Wang X, Saha S, et al. A review of elastic–plastic contact mechanics. Appl Mech Rev. 2017;69:060804.10.1115/1.4038187 ↗
5. Hertz H. On the contact of elastic solids. J R Angew Math. 1881;92:156–71.
6. Greenwood J, Williamson J. Contact of nominally flat surfaces. Proc R Soc Lond Seri A Math Phys Sci. 1966;19:295–300.
7. Whitehouse DJ, Archard J. The properties of random surfaces of significance in their contact. Proc R Soc Lond Seri A Math Phys Sci. 1970;316:97–121.10.1098/rspa.1970.0068 ↗
8. Greenwood J, Tripp J. The contact of two nominally flat rough surfaces. Proc Inst Mech Eng. 1970;185:625–33.10.1243/PIME_PROC_1970_185_069_02 ↗
9. Ciavarella M, Delfine V, Demelio G. A “re-vitalized” Greenwood and Williamson model of elastic contact between fractal surfaces. J Mech Phys Solids. 2006;54:2569–91.10.1016/j.jmps.2006.05.006 ↗
10. Johnson K, Kendall K, Roberts A. Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci. 1971;324:301–13.10.1098/rspa.1971.0141 ↗
11. Pei L, Hyun S, Molinari JF, et al. Finite element modeling of elasto–plastic contact between rough surfaces. J Mech Phys Solids. 2005;53:2385–409.10.1016/j.jmps.2005.06.008 ↗
12. Wang D, Xu C, Wan Q. Modeling tangential contact of rough surfaces with elastic- and plastic-deformed asperities. J Tribol. 2017;139:051401.10.1115/1.4035776 ↗
13. Chang W, Etsion I, Bogy DB. An elastic–plastic model for the contact of rough surfaces. J Tribol. 1987;109:257–63.10.1115/1.3261348 ↗
14. Chang W. An elastic–plastic contact model for a rough surface with an ion-plated soft metallic coating. Wear. 1997;212:229–37.10.1016/S0043-1648(97)00148-8 ↗
15. Evseev DG, Medvedev BM, Grigoriyan GG. Modification of the elastic–plastic model for the contact of rough surfaces. Wear. 1991;150:79–88.10.1016/0043-1648(91)90307-G ↗
16. Buczkowski R, Kleiber M. A stochastic model of rough surfaces for finite element contact analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 1999;169:43–59.10.1016/S0045-7825(98)00175-3 ↗
17. Zhao Y, Maietta DM, Chang L. An asperity microcontact model incorporating the transition from elastic deformation to fully plastic flow. J Tribol. 2000;122:86–93.10.1115/1.555332 ↗
18. Zhao Y, Chang L. A model of asperity interactions in elastic–plastic contact of rough surfaces. J Tribol. 2001;123:857–64.10.1115/1.1338482 ↗
19. Abbott EJ, Firestone FA. Specifying surface quality: a method based on accurate measurement and comparison. Mech Eng. 1933;55:569–72.
20. Lin LP, Lin JF. An elastoplastic microasperity contact model for metallic materials. J Tribol. 2006;127:666–72.10.1115/1.1843830 ↗
21. Brake MR. An analytical elastic-perfectly plastic contact model. Int J Solids Struct. 2012;49:3129–41.10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.06.013 ↗
22. Banihashemi MR, Mirzagoltabar AR, Tavakoli HR. The effects of yield mechanism selection on the performance based plastic design of steel moment frame. Indian J Sci Technol. 2015;8:158.10.17485/ijst/2015/v8iS9/50974 ↗
23. Wu CY, Li LY, Thornton C. Energy dissipation during normal impact of elastic and elastic–plastic spheres. Int J Impact Eng. 2005;32:593–604.10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.08.007 ↗
24. Lin LP, Lin JF. A new method for elastic–plastic contact analysis of a deformable sphere and a rigid flat. J Tribol. 2006;128:221–9.10.1115/1.2164469 ↗
25. Shankar S, Mayuram MM. A finite element based study on the elastic–plastic transition behavior in a hemisphere in contact with a rigid flat. J Tribol. 2008;130:044502.10.1115/1.2958081 ↗
26. Wadwalkar S, Jackson R, Kogut L. A study of the elastic–plastic deformation of heavily deformed spherical contacts. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part J J Eng Tribol. 2010;224:1091–2.10.1243/13506501JET763 ↗
27. Wang Z, Jin X, Liu S, Keer LM, Cao J, Wang Q. A new fast method for solving contact plasticity and its application in analyzing elasto–plastic partial slip. Mech Mater. 2013;60:18–35.10.1016/j.mechmat.2013.01.001 ↗
28. Kogut L, Etsion I. Elastic–plastic contact analysis of a sphere and a rigid Flat. J Appl Mech. 2002;69:657–62.10.1115/1.1490373 ↗
29. Kogut L, Etsion I. A finite element based elastic–plastic model for the contact of rough surfaces. Tribol Trans. 2003;46:383–90.10.1080/10402000308982641 ↗
30. Jackson RL, Green I. A finite element study of elasto–plastic hemispherical contact against a rigid flat. J Tribol. 2005;127:343–54.10.1115/1.1866166 ↗
31. Wang ZQ. A compact and easily accepted continuous model for the elastic–plastic contact of a sphere and a flat. J Appl Mech. 2013;80:014506.10.1115/1.4007230 ↗
32. Zhang X, Vu-Quoc L. A method to extract the mechanical properties of particles in collision based on a new elasto–plastic normal force–displacement model. Mech Mater. 2002;34:779–94.10.1016/S0167-6636(02)00181-3 ↗
33. Beheshti A, Khonsari M. Asperity micro-contact models as applied to the deformation of rough line contact. Tribol Int. 2012;52:61–74.10.1016/j.triboint.2012.02.026 ↗
34. Eriten M, Polycarpou AA, Bergman LA. Physics-based modeling for fretting behavior of nominally flat rough surfaces. Int J Solids Struct. 2011;48:1436–50.10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.01.028 ↗
35. Johnson KL. Contact mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University; 1995.