Relationship between Preoperative Maxillomandibular Transverse Discrepancy and Post-Surgical Stability in Class II Malocclusion
Source abstract
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between the presurgical maxillomandibular transverse index and post-surgical stability one year after mandibular advancement. For the material and methods, twenty-two subjects who were treated with mandibular advancement were enrolled in this study. Postsurgical stability was defined as the horizontal mandibular position change of <2 mm in lateral cephalogram 1 year after surgery. Subjects were divided into two groups according to the maintenance of postsurgical stability: a stable group (group S) and a less stable group (group LS). Presurgical maxillomandibular transverse index was determined as Yonsei transverse index (YTI) one month before surgery. A logistic analysis was performed on the postsurgical stability according to the YTI value. The presurgical, post-expansion target YTI value was obtained using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. There were no notable differences in the baseline characteristics of the two groups except for vertical positions of point A, B, and gender distribution. Before surgery, however, there was a significant difference in YTI at both the fossa and CR level between the groups. The amount of mandibular advancement did not show a significant difference. The odds ratio for YTI was 0.35 (p = 0.024). The prediction of stability of presurgical YTI yielded an area under the ROC curve of 0.88. The cut-off value for YTI was 1.45 mm. It can thus be concluded that presurgical transverse index showed a correlation with postsurgical stability, and correcting it in the presurgical phase to a certain level appears to aid in securing postsurgical stability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Temporomandibular Joint Disorders · Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Orthodontics, Institute of Craniofacial Deformity, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
Department of Orthodontics, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Institute of Craniofacial Deformity, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul 06273, Republic of Korea
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
Funding
faculty research grant of Yonsei University College of Dentistry
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Proffit, W.R., Fields, H., and Sarver, D.M. (2013). Combined Surgical and Orthodontic Treatment, Elsevier-Mosby. [5th ed.].
2. The hierarchy of stability and predictability in orthognathic surgery with rigid fixation: An update and extension10.1186/1746-160X-3-21 ↗
3. Eckmüller, S., Paddenberg, E., Hiller, K.-A., Proff, P., Knüttel, H., and Kirschneck, C. (2022). Relapse in class II orthognathic surgery: A systematic review. BMC Oral Health, 22.10.1186/s12903-022-02636-x ↗
4. Correction of severe obstructive sleep apnea with bimaxillary transverse distraction osteogenesis and maxillomandibular advancement10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.11.029 ↗
5. Stability and predictability of orthognathic surgery10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.06.003 ↗
6. Stability of pre-orthodontic orthognathic surgery using intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy versus conventional treatment10.1016/j.joms.2015.07.012 ↗
7. Stability of mandibular setback surgery with and without presurgical orthodontics10.1016/j.joms.2013.09.033 ↗
8. Comparative study of postoperative stability between conventional orthognathic surgery and a surgery-first orthognathic approach after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for skeletal class III correction10.5125/jkaoms.2017.43.1.23 ↗
9. Dental arch dimensions in Class II division 1 malocclusions with mandibular deficiency10.2319/022307-89.1 ↗
10. Comparison of dental arch and alveolar widths of patients with class II, division 1 malocclusion and subjects with class I ideal occlusion
11. Dental and alveolar arch widths in normal occlusion, class ii division 1 and class ii division 2
12. Miniscrew-assisted nonsurgical palatal expansion before orthognathic surgery for a patient with severe mandibular prognathism10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.10.065 ↗
13. Effect of the transpalatal arch during extraction treatment10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.07.031 ↗
14. Maxillary transverse expansion in adults: Rationale, appliance design, and treatment outcomes10.1053/j.sodo.2018.01.006 ↗
15. Update on cone beam technology and orthodontic analysis10.1016/j.cden.2014.04.004 ↗
16. Maxillomandibular arch width differences at estimated centers of resistance: Comparison between normal occlusion and skeletal Class III malocclusion10.4041/kjod.2017.47.3.167 ↗
17. Finite-element analysis of the center of resistance of the mandibular dentition10.4041/kjod.2017.47.1.21 ↗
18. Baik, H.S., Hwang, C.J., Yu, H.S., Lee, K.J., Cha, J.Y., Choi, Y.J., Choi, S.H., Park, S.H., and Han, S.S. (2021). Cephalometric Radiography, Daehan Narae. [3rd ed.].
19. Combined surgical-orthodontic treatment: How did it evolve and what are the best practices now?10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.02.009 ↗
20. Orthodontic preparation for orthognathic surgery10.1016/j.coms.2014.08.002 ↗
21. Mandibular advancement surgery in high-angle and low-angle class II patients: Different long-term skeletal responses10.1067/mod.2001.110983 ↗
22. Stability after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy advancement surgery with rigid internal fixation: A systematic review10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.060 ↗
23. Evaluation of long-term hard tissue relapse following surgical–orthodontic treatment in skeletal class II patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1016/j.ijom.2020.09.001 ↗
24. Interaction analysis of risk factors for long-term skeletal relapse following mandibular advancement with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy10.1016/j.ijom.2019.07.002 ↗
25. Maxillary transverse deficiency diagnosed by 3 methods and its relationship with molar angulation in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion10.1016/j.ajodo.2022.09.015 ↗
26. Maxillary sagittal and vertical displacement induced by surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion10.1067/mod.2001.113791 ↗
27. Hosmer, D.W., Lemeshow, S., and Sturdivant, R.X. (2013). Applied Logistic Regression, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118548387 ↗
28. Stability of orthognathic surgery: A review of rigid fixation10.1016/S0266-4356(96)90002-9 ↗
29. Three-dimensional evaluation of distal and proximal segment skeletal relapse following isolated mandibular advancement surgery in 100 consecutive patients: A one-year follow-up study10.1016/j.ijom.2021.03.020 ↗
30. Long-term follow-up of class II adults treated with orthodontic camouflage: A comparison with orthognathic surgery outcomes10.1067/mod.2003.43 ↗
31. Failure load and stress analysis of orthodontic miniscrews with different transmucosal collar diameter10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.07.032 ↗
32. Cassoni, A., Manganiello, L., Barbera, G., Priore, P., Fadda, M.T., Pucci, R., and Valentini, V. (2022). Three-dimensional comparison of the maxillary surfaces through ICP-type algorithm: Accuracy evaluation of CAD/CAM technologies in orthognathic surgery. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19.10.3390/ijerph191811834 ↗