journal article·2024-04-30Open access

Intermonitor Variability of Garmin Vivofit® Jr. Wristband

Gema Díaz-Quesada, José María Gimenez-Egido, Jonathan Connor, Enrique Ortega-Toro, Gema Torres-Luque

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 9

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to evaluate the reliability of Garmin Vivofit® Jr. physical activity (PA) wristbands during daily life physical activities. Six wristbands were randomly selected from a stock of twenty-four. The wristbands were worn by a single four-year-old participant, with three on the right wrist area and three on the left wrist area. To assess device reliability under laboratory conditions on a treadmill (Powerjog, model JM200, Sport Engineering Ltd., Birmingham, UK), the participant wore the six wristbands while performing five work conditions: sitting and standing (30 times per minute, controlled by a metronome), walking at 3 km/h, walking at 4 km/h, running at 5 km/h, and running at 6 km/h. Throughout the six minutes, variables related to physical activity provided by the device, step volume, and minutes of physical activity were recorded using the specific application of the wristband (Garmin International Inc., Olathe, KS, USA). The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were high for all six wristbands with each other, for both the number of steps taken (ICC = 0.991–0.998) and the number of minutes of PA (ICC = 0.892–0.977). The critical alpha value of the Cusum test was highest at.050 for all wristband associations. In conclusion, good reliability was found among the six wristbands, which could be adopted for field-based research to quantify physical activities.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders · Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics · Transport Systems and Technology

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Humanities and Education Science, University of Jaen, Campus de las lagunillas (Edificio D2), 23071 Jaén, Spain

Research Group “Science, Education, Sport and Physical Activity”, Campus de las lagunillas (Edificio D2), 23071 Jaén, Spain

Faculty of Sport Science, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain

Sport Performance Analysis Association, 30720 Murcia, Spain

Department of Sport and Exercise Science, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4810, Australia

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. The association of major patterns of physical activity, sedentary behavior and sleep with health-related quality of life: A cohort study10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.08.015 ↗
2. Chastin, S.F., Palarea-Albaladejo, J., Dontje, M.L., and Skelton, D.A. (2015). Combined Effects of Time Spent in Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviors and Sleep on Obesity and Cardio-Metabolic Health Markers: A Novel Compositional Data Analysis Approach. PLoS ONE, 10.10.1371/journal.pone.0139984 ↗
3. A checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of validation studies on self-report instruments for physical activity and sedentary behavior10.1123/jpah.9.s1.s29 ↗
4. Should we reframe how we think about physical activity and sedentary behaviour measurement? Validity and reliability reconsidered10.1186/s12966-016-0351-4 ↗
5. Evolution of accelerometer methods for physical activity research10.1136/bjsports-2014-093546 ↗
6. Utilization and Harmonization of Adult Accelerometry Data: Review and Expert Consensus10.1249/MSS.0000000000000661 ↗
7. Keadle, S.K., Shiroma, E.J., Freedson, P.S., and Lee, I.M. (2014). Impact of accelerometer data processing decisions on the sample size, wear time and physical activity level of a large cohort study. BMC Public Health, 14.10.1186/1471-2458-14-1210 ↗
8. Accelerometer Data Collection and Processing Criteria to Assess Physical Activity and Other Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Practical Considerations10.1007/s40279-017-0716-0 ↗
9. Activity wristband-based physical activity recommendations in young people10.1016/j.scispo.2021.05.007 ↗
10. Are Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers and Mobile Applications Valid for Assessing Physical Activity in High School Students? Wearfit Study10.52082/jssm.2022.356 ↗
11. Validation of the Fitbit One, Garmin Vivofit and Jawbone UP activity tracker in estimation of energy expenditure during treadmill walking and running10.1080/03091902.2016.1253795 ↗
12. Wearable, yes, but able…? It is time for evidence-based marketing claims!10.1136/bjsports-2016-097295 ↗
13. Validity of Garmin Vívofit and Polar Loop measuring daily step counts inf free-living conditions in adults10.5507/ag.2016.014 ↗
14. Godino, J.G., Wing, D., de Zambotti, M., Baker, F.C., Bagot, K., Inkelis, S., Pautz, C., Higgins, M., Nichols, J., and Brumback, T. (2020). Performance of a commercial multi-sensor wearable (Fitbit Charge HR) in measuring physical activity and sleep in healthy children. PLoS ONE, 15.10.1371/journal.pone.0237719 ↗
15. Validity of the Fitbit Ace and Moki devices for assessing steps during different walking conditions in young adolescents10.1123/pes.2021-0026 ↗
16. Validity of activity wristbands for estimating daily physical activity in primary schoolchildren under free-living conditions: School-Fit study10.3389/fpubh.2023.1211237 ↗
17. Feasibility of Physical Activity Assessment with Wearable Devices in Children Aged 4–10 Years—A Pilot Study10.3389/fped.2018.00005 ↗
18. Díaz-Quesada, G., Bahamonde-Pérez, C., Giménez-Egido, J.M., and Torres-Luque, G. (2021). Use of Wearable Devices to Study Physical Activity in Early Childhood Education. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su132413998 ↗
19. Physical activity in the recess of childhood education: A pilot study using Garmin Vivofit Jr wristbands
20. Schoeppe, S., Salmon, J., Williams, S.L., Power, D., Alley, S., Rebar, A.L., Hayman, M., Duncan, M.J., and Vandelanotte, C. (2020). Effects of an Activity Tracker and App Intervention to Increase Physical Activity in Whole Families-The Step It Up Family Feasibility Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17.10.3390/ijerph17207655 ↗
21. Criterion-Related Validity of Consumer-Wearable Activity Trackers for Estimating Steps in Primary Schoolchildren under Controlled Conditions: Fit-Person Study
22. Accuracy of the vivofit activity tracker10.1080/03091902.2016.1193238 ↗
23. Are Currently Available Wearable Devices for Activity Tracking and Heart Rate Monitoring Accurate, Precise, and Medically Beneficial?10.4258/hir.2015.21.4.315 ↗
24. Intermonitor variability of GT3X accelerometer10.1055/s-0032-1312580 ↗
25. Inter-trial variability of GT3X accelerometer10.1016/j.scispo.2014.03.002 ↗
26. Intermonitor variability of the RT3 accelerometer during typical physical activities10.1249/01.MSS.0000113743.68789.36 ↗
27. Jimenez-Olmedo, J.M., Pueo, B., Mossi, J.M., and Villalon-Gasch, L. (2023). Concurrent Validity of the Inertial Measurement Unit Vmaxpro in Vertical Jump Estimation. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13020959 ↗
28. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 ↗
29. Statistical Methods in Assessing Agreement: Models, Issues, and Tools10.1198/016214502753479392 ↗
30. A Proposal for Strength-of-Agreement Criteria for Lin’s Concordance Correlation Coefficient
31. Correlation Coefficients10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864 ↗
32. Lake, J., Augustus, S., Austin, K., Mundy, P., McMahon, J., Comfort, P., and Haff, G. (2018). The Validity of the Push Band 2.0 during Vertical Jump Performance. Sports, 6.10.3390/sports6040140 ↗
33. Rago, V., Brito, J., Figueiredo, P., Carvalho, T., Fernandes, T., Fonseca, P., and Rebelo, A. (2018). Countermovement Jump Analysis Using Different Portable Devices: Implications for Field Testing. Sports, 6.10.3390/sports6030091 ↗
34. Comparison of Several Regression Procedures for Method Comparison Studies and Determination of Sample Sizes Application of Linear Regression Procedures for Method Comparison Studies in Clinical Chemistry, Part II
35. Criterion-Validity of Commercially Available Physical Activity Tracker to Estimate Step Count, Covered Distance and Energy Expenditure during Sports Conditions10.3389/fphys.2017.00725 ↗
36. How Accurate Is Your Activity Tracker? A Comparative Study of Step Counts in Low-Intensity Physical Activities10.2196/mhealth.6321 ↗
37. How valid are wearable physical activity trackers for measuring steps?10.1080/17461391.2016.1255261 ↗
38. Physical Activity Assessment Between Consumer- and Research-Grade Accelerometers: A Comparative Study in Free-Living Conditions10.2196/mhealth.6281 ↗
39. The Accuracy of Smart Devices for Measuring Physical Activity in Daily Life: Validation Study10.2196/10972 ↗
40. Validity of Garmin Vívofit 1 and Garmin Vívofit 3 for School-Based Physical Activity Monitoring10.1123/pes.2018-0019 ↗
41. Revisiting “How Many Steps Are Enough?10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817c7133 ↗
42. Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer measures of physical activity in preschool children10.1123/pes.19.2.205 ↗
43. Daily physical activity in Japanese preschool children evaluated by triaxial accelerometry: The relationship between period of engagement in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and daily step counts10.2114/jpa2.28.283 ↗
44. National Association for Sport and Physical Education (NASPE) (2014). Active Start: A Statement of Physical Activity Guidelines for Children from Birth to Age 5, Shape America. [2nd ed.].
45. Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) (2020). WHO Guidelines on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour: At a Glance, Organización Mundial de la Salud.
46. Validity of FitBit, Jawbone UP, Nike+ and other wearable devices for level and stair walking10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.04.025 ↗
47. Validity of Wrist-Wearable Activity Devices for Estimating Physical Activity in Adolescents: Comparative Study10.2196/18320 ↗
48. FDA regulation of mobile health technologies10.1056/NEJMhle1403384 ↗
49. Piwek, L., Ellis, D.A., Andrews, S., and Joinson, A. (2016). The Rise of Consumer Health Wearables: Promises and Barriers. PLoS Med., 13.10.1371/journal.pmed.1001953 ↗
50. Accuracy and Acceptability of Wrist-Wearable Activity-Tracking Devices: Systematic Review of the Literature10.2196/30791 ↗
51. Concurrent Validity of the Garmin Vivofit®4 to Accurately Record Step Count in Older Adults in Challenging Environments10.1123/japa.2021-0231 ↗
52. How many steps/day are enough? For children and adolescents10.1186/1479-5868-8-78 ↗
53. Torres-Luque, G. (2023, March 10). Cómo Controlar su Actividad Física de Forma Inteligente. Sección Enfórmate. Available online: https://elpais.com/salud-y-bienestar/enformate/2023-05-25/como-controlar-su-actividad-fisica-de-forma-inteligente.html.