Measurement of the Impact Loads to Reduce Injuries in Acrobatic Gymnasts: Designing a Dedicated Platform
Source abstract
Abstract
Background: The main objective of this study was the development of a specific load platform that would meet the needs of gymnasts and acrobatic coaches. This new platform has larger dimensions and is an identical structure to the plywood floor surface normally used; it was designed to make competitions with gymnasts safer and more like a real training situation. During a landing, there is high body stiffness, especially in the knees and ankles, which can cause injuries due to the number of repetitions performed in this gymnastics specialty. Methods: A group of 10 volunteers, with a mean age of 14.7 ± 2.4 years, performed at least 10 valid vertical jumps on each platform. Results: Despite being a preliminary study, this specific platform was shown to be more suitable for gymnastic use, compared to the industrial one, which represents a significant advantage for the modality. In fact, this platform is similar to the surface used for training and competition, allowing athletes to perform the jump in a similar way, and for the results to be replicable during the practice of the sport. The standard deviation values were lower, which shows that the new platform was more suitable for acrobatic gymnastics. Conclusions: As the maximum vertical load induced during landing after a jump has a significant effect on the likelihood of gymnasts suffering injuries, the development of a new load platform specifically for acrobatic gymnastics is clearly an improvement in this discipline. Knowledge of the load transmitted to the body can help coaches and athletes in defining training, and avoiding the possible occurrence of injuries. Therefore, it is necessary to use a platform that can accurately evaluate the load transmitted to the acrobatic gymnasts during real training and competition conditions, which is achieved with this new platform.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies · Sports injuries and prevention · Sports Performance and Training
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of Coimbra, Centre for Mechanical Engineering, Materials and Processes (CEMMPRE, ARISE), Department of Mechanical Engineering, 3030-788 Coimbra, Portugal
University of Coimbra, Research Unit for Sport and Physical Activity (CIDAF), Faculty of Sport Sciences and Physical Education, 3040-248 Coimbra, Portugal
Funding
FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Redescobrindo a Ginástica Acrobática10.22456/1982-8918.5755 ↗
2. FIG (2023, July 10). Federation Internationale de Gymnastique. Available online: https://www.gymnastics.sport/site/pages/disciplines/hist-acro.php.
3. Sleep Duration, Body Composition, Dietary Profile and Eating Behaviours among Children and Adolescents: A Comparison between Portuguese Acrobatic Gymnasts10.1007/s00431-018-3124-z ↗
4. Influence of the Playing Surface on Changes of Direction and Plantar Pressures during an Agility Test in Youth Futsal Players10.1080/17461391.2019.1677780 ↗
5. Differences among Plantar Pressure of Acrobatic Gymnasts When They Jump over Two Competition Floors. Does the Presence of Mattresses Affect the Gymnasts’ Performance?10.1016/j.scispo.2020.05.006 ↗
6. Biomechanical Approaches to Understanding the Potentially Injurious Demands of Gymnastic-Style Impact Landings10.1186/1758-2555-4-4 ↗
7. Basic Landing Characteristics and Their Application in Artistic Gymnastics
8. Mechanical Demand and Multijoint Control during Landing Depend on Orientation of the Body Segments Relative to the Reaction Force10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00110-5 ↗
9. Greater Lower Limb Flexion in Gymnastic Landings Is Associated with Reduced Landing Force: A Repeated Measures Study10.1080/14763141.2015.1029514 ↗
10. Injury Profile in Elite Acrobatic Gymnasts Compared by Gender
11. Vertical Impact Force and Loading Rate on the Gymnastics Table Vault
12. Acute Effect of Acrobatic Jumps on Different Elastic Platforms in the Muscle Response Evaluated through Tensiomyography
13. Gymnastics Training Consequences: Possibility of Upper and Lower Body Pain
14. Jumping Performance Profile of Male and Female Gymnasts
15. Retrospective Study Regarding Artistic Gymnastics Injuries10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.176 ↗
16. Acute Effects of Muscular Fatigue on Vertical Jump Performance in Acrobatic Gymnasts, Evaluated by Instrumented Insoles: A Pilot Study10.1155/2021/8849100 ↗
17. Effects of Fatigue on Ankle Biomechanics during Jumps: A Systematic Review10.1016/j.jelekin.2018.06.012 ↗
18. Boys Gymnastics Injuries: A 9-Year Retrospective Review10.1080/00913847.2021.1929535 ↗
19. Acrobatic Gymnastics Injury: Occurrence, Site and Training Risk Factors10.1016/j.ptsp.2010.01.002 ↗
20. Survey of Injuries in Seattle Area Levels 4 to 10 Female Club Gymnasts10.1097/JSM.0b013e31822e89a8 ↗
21. A Systematic Review of Injuries in Gymnastics10.1080/00913847.2018.1527646 ↗
22. Ground Reaction Forces among Gymnasts and Recreational Athletes in Drop Landings
23. Gender Differences in Lower Extremity Kinematics, Kinetics and Energy Absorption during Landing10.1016/S0268-0033(03)00090-1 ↗
24. Landing from Different Heights: Biomechanical and Neuromuscular Strategies in Trained Gymnasts and Untrained Prepubescent Girls10.1016/j.jelekin.2016.11.003 ↗
25. Symmetry in Ground Reaction Forces During Landing in Gymnasts and Non-Gymnasts: 67610.1249/00005768-200605001-00988 ↗
26. Biomechanical and Neuromuscular Strategies on Backward Somersault Landing in Artistic Gymnastics: A Case Study10.3934/mbe.2019293 ↗
27. Biomechanical Responses to Landing Strategies of Female Artistic Gymnasts10.1080/17461391.2021.1976842 ↗
28. Biomechanical Research in Artistic Gymnastics: A Review10.1080/14763140608522878 ↗
29. Biomechanical Research Methods Used in Acrobatic Gymnastics: A Systematic Review10.3390/biomechanics3010005 ↗
30. A New Force Plate Design Incorporating Octagonal Strain Rings10.1123/jab.11.3.311 ↗
31. Validity of Vertical Jump Measurement Devices10.1080/02640414.2011.624539 ↗
32. Effect of Increased Load on Vertical Jump Mechanical Characteristics in Acrobats
33. Force Plate Use in Performance Monitoring and Sport Science Testing
34. Mourão, L., De Jesus, K., Viriato, N., Fernandes, R.J., and Vilas-boas, J.P. (2016). Design and Construction of a 3D Force Plate Prototype for Developing an Instrumented Swimming Start Block. J. Biomed. Eng. Inform., 2.10.5430/jbei.v2n2p99 ↗
35. Gait Posture Non-Linear Re-Calibration of Force Platforms10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.02.008 ↗
36. Specific Injuries Induced by the Practice of Trampoline, Tumbling and Acrobatic Gymnastics10.1007/s00167-012-1982-x ↗
37. Influence of Foot-Landing Positions at Initial Contact on Knee Flexion Angles for Single-Leg Drop Landings10.1080/02701367.2019.1669765 ↗
38. The Association between Lower Extremity Energy Absorption and Biomechanical Factors Related to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.07.013 ↗