journal article·2024-04-06Open access

Force in Cable of Pretensioner Tube—A Possibility of Car Accident Reconstruction

Adrian Soica

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 7

Abstract

The reconstruction of traffic accidents has grown as an interdisciplinary field, encompassing bodies of research from automotive engineering, traffic and transport engineering, biomechanics, and forensic sciences. In this work, a method is proposed by which the value of the force in the safety belt buckle can be determined provided the belt buckle is equipped with a pretensioning system with a pyrotechnic trigger in the pretensioner tube, PBP—Pyrotechnical Buckle Pretensioner, or PLP—Pyrotechnical Lap Pretensioner type. The anti-return system of the pretensioner mechanism, which prevents the passenger’s body from moving forward, contains a set of balls that block the movement of the piston in the pretensioner tube after its activation. When limiting the movement, the force the human body exerts on the safety belt webbing is transformed into the deformation of the pretensioner tube by the balls of the anti-return system. Depending on the magnitude of the force, the marks left by the balls differ. This is an alternative method for determining the force that occurs in a seatbelt and causes injury to the occupants of a vehicle. The advantage of this method is that the force in the seatbelt buckle cable can be determined relatively quickly and accurately by analyzing the deformations in the pretensioner tube, without a need for expensive laboratory equipment. The limitation of the model resides in the consideration of a static system with rigid bodies. The correlation between the normal force causing the deformation of the tube and the force in the belt buckle cable is obtained by means of a mechanical model that explains the operation of the anti-return system. By comparing the values of the normal force given by the proposed model and the elastoplastic model, a good correlation is found. Finally, a regression curve is determined to help the expert in approximating the force in the buckle cable depending on the deformation size in the pretensioner tube. The value of this force also enables biomechanical or medical specialists to correlate the degree of injury to occupants of a vehicle depending on the force in the seatbelt.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis · Mechanical Failure Analysis and Simulation · Transportation Safety and Impact Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Automotive and Transport Engineering, Transilvania University of Brasov, 500036 Brasov, Romania

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. Brooks, D. (1989). A Comprehensive Review of Pedestrian Impact Reconstruction, SAE International. SAE Paper, no.890859.
2. Lipert, R. (1999). Motor Vehicle Accident Reconstruction and Cause Analysis, Lexis Publishing. [5th ed.].
3. Brach, R., and Brach, M. (2011). Vehicle Accident Analysis and Reconstruction Methods, SAE.10.4271/R-397 ↗
4. Fricke, L.B. (1990). Traffic Accident Reconstruction, Northwestern University Traffic Institute.
5. Struble, D.E. (2013). Automotive Accident Reconstruction: Practices and Principles, CRC Press.10.1201/b15542 ↗
6. Zou, D., Fan, Y., Liu, N., Zhang, J., Liu, D., Liu, Q., Li, Z., Wang, J., and Huang, J. (2022). Multi objective optimization algorithm for accurate MADYMO reconstruction of vehicle-pedestrian accidents. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 10.10.3389/fbioe.2022.1032621 ↗
7. Datentechnik, S. (2021). PC-CRASH.A Simulation Program for Vehicle Accidents, Operating and Technical Manual, PC-CRASH. Version 13.1.
8. Adaptive vehicle dynamics state estimator for on board automotive applications and performance analysis10.1080/00423114.2022.2158567 ↗
9. Biomechanical Analysis of Indy Race Car Crashes
10. (2024, March 27). Regulation No 16 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE)—Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of: I. Safety-Belts Restraint Systems Child Restraint Systems Isofix Child Restraint Systems for Occupants of Power-Driven Vehicles, II. Vehicles Equipped with Safety-Belts, Restraint Systems, Child Restraint Systems and Isofix Child Restraint Systems (OJL31330.11.2 007, p.58, ELI). Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2007/16(2)/oj.
11. Assessment of a Three-Point Restraint System with a Pretensioned Lap Belt and an Inflatable, Force-Limited Shoulder Belt
12. Mertz, H.J., and Dalmotas, D.J. (2007). Effects of Shoulder Belt Limit Forces on Adult Thoracic Protection in Frontal Collisions. Stapp Car Crash J., 361–380.10.4271/2007-22-0015 ↗
13. Estimating seatbelt effectiveness using matched pair cohort methods10.1016/S0001-4575(01)00087-2 ↗
14. The effect of seatbelt pretensioners and load limiters in the reduction ofMAIS2+, MAIS3+, and fatal injuries inreal-world frontal crashes10.1016/j.aap.2023.107180 ↗
15. Assessment of an innovative seatbelt with independent control of the shoulder and lap portions using THORtests, the THUMS model, and PMHS tests10.1080/15389588.2016.1201204 ↗
16. The limitations of current seatbelts in Europe—Some population considerations10.1097/00005373-199504000-00012 ↗
17. Lu, H., Andreen, M., Fausst, D., Furton, L., Holcombe, S., Kohoyda-Inglis, C., Putala, B., Yee, J., and Wang, S. (2011). Safety Belt and Occupant Factors Influencing Thoracic & Upper Abdominal Injuries in Frontal Crashes, Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc.. 2011-01-1129.10.4271/2011-01-1129 ↗
18. Foret-Bruno, J.-Y., Trosseille, X., LeCoz, J.-Y., Bendjellal, F., Steyer, C., Phalempin, T., Villeforceix, D., Dandres, P., and Got, C. (1998). Thoracic Injury Risk in Frontal Car Crashes with Occupant Restrained with Belt Load Limiter, Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc.10.4271/983166 ↗
19. Comparison of Thoracic Injury Risk in Frontal Car Crashes for Occupant Restrained without Belt Load Limiters and Those Restrained with 6kN and 4kN Belt Load Limiters
20. Li, P., Li, Y., Hua, X., Guo, Y., and Curtis, J.S. (2023). 3D DEM Simulations and Experiments on Spherical Impactor Penetrating into the Elongated Particles. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16041664 ↗
21. Spherical Cavity Expansion Approach for the Study of Rigid-Penetrator’s Impact Problems10.3390/applmech1010003 ↗
22. Antona-Makoshi, J., Yamamoto, Y., Kato, R., Kunitomi, S., Konosu, A., Dokko, Y., Yasuki, T., and Takamiya, T. (2016, January 14–16). Effect of seatbelt and airbag loads on thoracic injury risk in frontal crashes considering average and small body size and age-dependent thoracicfragility. Proceedings of the IRCOBI Conference, Malaga, Spain.10.1080/15389588.2015.1014552 ↗
23. Eggers, A., Eickhoff, B., Dobberstein, J., Zellmer, H., and Adolph, T. (2014, January 10–12). Effects of Variations in Belt Geometry, Double Pretensioning and Adaptive Load Limiting on Advanced Chest Measurements of THOR and Hybrid III. Proceedings of the 2014 IRCOBI Conference, Berlin, Germany.
24. Experimental investigation of the effect of occupant characteristics on contemporary seatbelt payout behavior in frontal impacts10.1080/15389588.2015.1088944 ↗
25. Pipkorn, B., Lopez-Valdes, F.J., Lundgren, C., Bråse, D., and Sunnevång, C. (2015, January 8–11). Innovative SeatBelt System for Reduced Chest Deflection. Proceedings of the 24th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV), Gothenburg, Sweden.
26. Beillas, P., Soni, A., and Chevalier, M.-C. (2014, January 10–12). Q6 Dummy Thoracic Response and Diagonal Belt Interactions: Observations based on Dummy Testing and Human and Dummy Simulations. Proceedings of the 2014 IRCOBI Conference, Berlin, Germany.
27. A Review of Elastic-Plastic Contact Mechanics10.1115/1.4038187 ↗
28. Plastic Deformation of Rough Metallic Surfaces10.1007/s11249-020-01368-9 ↗
29. Johnson, K.L. (1987). Contact Mechanics, Cambridge University Press.
30. A Comprehensive Study of the Elasto-Plastic Contact of a Sphere and a Flat10.1016/j.triboint.2015.09.005 ↗
31. Reassessing Spherical Indentation: Contact Regimes and Mechanical Property Extractions10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.05.025 ↗
32. Elasto-Plastic Hemispherical Contact Models for Various Mechanical Properties10.1243/1350650041762604 ↗
33. Tabor, D. (2000). The Hardness of Metals, Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198507765.001.0001 ↗
34. Way of Determining the Hardness of Bodies and Some Applications of the Same
35. Investigations of Hardness Testing and Hardness
36. Development of Pile-Up During Spherical Indentation of Elastic–Plastic Solids10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.02.033 ↗
37. Plastic Compression of Spheres10.1080/01418618408236551 ↗
38. Indentation Analysis of Elastic-Plastic Homogeneous and Layered Media: Criteria for Determining the Real Material Hardness10.1115/1.1572515 ↗
39. Three-Dimensional Contact Analysis of Elastic-Plastic Layered Media with Fractal Surface Topographies10.1115/1.1327583 ↗
40. Beitz, W., and Kuttner, K.-H. (1994). Dubbel Hanbook of Mechanical Engineering, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4471-3566-1 ↗
41. Friction coefficients for steel to steel contact surfaces in air and sea water10.1088/1742-6596/1669/1/012002 ↗
42. Determination of the friction coefficient as a function of sliding speed and normal pressure for steel C45 and stee l40 HM10.1016/j.acme.2013.04.010 ↗
43. Evin, E., Daneshjo, N., Mareš, A., Tomáš, M., and Petrovčiková, K. (2021). Experimental Assessment of Friction Coefficient in Deep Drawing and Its Verification by Numerical Simulation. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11062756 ↗
44. Friction Experiments for Dynamical Coefficient Measurement10.1155/2011/613581 ↗
45. (1985). Plain End Seamless Precision Steel Tubes—Technical Conditions for Delivery (Standard No. ISO3304:1975). Available online: https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/sist/8f436f55-bb4c-4260-a618-4353211c1e0f/iso-3304-1975.
46. (2020). Rolling Bearings—Balls—Part1: Steel Balls (Standard No. ISO3290-1:2014). Available online: https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/sist/358646e0-deea-4e16-afa8-f496dc77fe1d/iso-3290-1-2014.
47. U.S. Department of Transportation (1979). NHTSA Evaluation Plan for Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 208 Occupant Crash Protection, U.S. Department of Transportation.
48. U.S. Department of Transportation (2007). FMVSS No.214 Amending Side Impact Dynamic Test Adding Oblique Pole Test, U.S. Department of Transportation.
49. (2024, March 27). Directive 96/27/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 1996 on the Protection of Occupants of Motor Vehicles in the Event of a Side Impact. Available online: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/0a5e2760-59c8-47f0-829c-4a0d16e05169.
50. Effects of Elastic Indenter Deformation on Spherical Instrumented Indentation Tests: The Reduced Elastic Modulus10.1080/14786435.2010.497473 ↗
51. Simple Theory of Static and Dynamic Hardness10.1098/rspa.1948.0008 ↗
52. (2020, November 05). Steel Tubes for Precision Applications—Seamless Cold Drawn Tubes E235, E355. Available online: https://www.peninsulardevastagos.es/.